Emergency department transport rates of children from the scene of motor vehicle collisions

Do booster seats make a difference?

Darlene R. House, Gretchen Huffman, Jennifer D H Walthall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) are the leading cause of death and disability among children older than 1 year. Many states currently mandate all children between the ages of 4 and 8 years be restrained in booster seats. The implementation of a booster-seat law is generally thought to decrease the occurrence of injury to children. We hypothesized that appropriate restraint with booster seats would also cause a decrease in emergency department (ED) visits compared with children who were unrestrained. This is an important measure as ED visits are a surrogate marker for injury. OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this study was to look at the rate of ED visits between children in booster seats compared with those in other or no restraint systems involved in MVCs. Injury severity was compared across restraint types as a secondary outcome of booster-seat use after the implementation of a state law. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed including all children 4 to 8 years old involved in MVCs to which emergency medical services was dispatched. Ambulance services used a novel on-scene computer charting system for all MVC-related encounters to collect age, sex, child-restraint system, Glasgow Coma Scale score, injuries, and final disposition. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine children were studied with 58 children (35.6%) in booster seats, 73 children in seatbelts alone (45.2%), and 28 children (19.1%) in no restraint system. 76 children (47.7%), 74 by emergency medical services and 2 by private vehicle, were transported to the ED with no significant difference between restraint use (P = 0.534). Utilization of a restraint system did not significantly impact MVC injury severity. However, of those children who either died (n = 2) or had an on-scene decreased Glasgow Coma Scale score (n = 6), 75% (6/8) were not restrained in a booster seat. CONCLUSIONS: The use of booster-seat restraints does not appear to be associated with whether a child will be transported to the ED for trauma evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1211-1214
Number of pages4
JournalPediatric Emergency Care
Volume28
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Motor Vehicles
Hospital Emergency Service
Wounds and Injuries
Glasgow Coma Scale
Emergency Medical Services
Child Restraint Systems
Ambulances
Computer Systems
Observational Studies
Cause of Death
Biomarkers
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • booster seats
  • motor vehicle crash
  • pediatric injury prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Emergency department transport rates of children from the scene of motor vehicle collisions : Do booster seats make a difference? / House, Darlene R.; Huffman, Gretchen; Walthall, Jennifer D H.

In: Pediatric Emergency Care, Vol. 28, No. 11, 11.2012, p. 1211-1214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

House, Darlene R. ; Huffman, Gretchen ; Walthall, Jennifer D H. / Emergency department transport rates of children from the scene of motor vehicle collisions : Do booster seats make a difference?. In: Pediatric Emergency Care. 2012 ; Vol. 28, No. 11. pp. 1211-1214.
@article{13c4e993d94a4675bc581e26a9e8b40e,
title = "Emergency department transport rates of children from the scene of motor vehicle collisions: Do booster seats make a difference?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) are the leading cause of death and disability among children older than 1 year. Many states currently mandate all children between the ages of 4 and 8 years be restrained in booster seats. The implementation of a booster-seat law is generally thought to decrease the occurrence of injury to children. We hypothesized that appropriate restraint with booster seats would also cause a decrease in emergency department (ED) visits compared with children who were unrestrained. This is an important measure as ED visits are a surrogate marker for injury. OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this study was to look at the rate of ED visits between children in booster seats compared with those in other or no restraint systems involved in MVCs. Injury severity was compared across restraint types as a secondary outcome of booster-seat use after the implementation of a state law. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed including all children 4 to 8 years old involved in MVCs to which emergency medical services was dispatched. Ambulance services used a novel on-scene computer charting system for all MVC-related encounters to collect age, sex, child-restraint system, Glasgow Coma Scale score, injuries, and final disposition. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine children were studied with 58 children (35.6{\%}) in booster seats, 73 children in seatbelts alone (45.2{\%}), and 28 children (19.1{\%}) in no restraint system. 76 children (47.7{\%}), 74 by emergency medical services and 2 by private vehicle, were transported to the ED with no significant difference between restraint use (P = 0.534). Utilization of a restraint system did not significantly impact MVC injury severity. However, of those children who either died (n = 2) or had an on-scene decreased Glasgow Coma Scale score (n = 6), 75{\%} (6/8) were not restrained in a booster seat. CONCLUSIONS: The use of booster-seat restraints does not appear to be associated with whether a child will be transported to the ED for trauma evaluation.",
keywords = "booster seats, motor vehicle crash, pediatric injury prevention",
author = "House, {Darlene R.} and Gretchen Huffman and Walthall, {Jennifer D H}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/PEC.0b013e318271c0ef",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1211--1214",
journal = "Pediatric Emergency Care",
issn = "0749-5161",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency department transport rates of children from the scene of motor vehicle collisions

T2 - Do booster seats make a difference?

AU - House, Darlene R.

AU - Huffman, Gretchen

AU - Walthall, Jennifer D H

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) are the leading cause of death and disability among children older than 1 year. Many states currently mandate all children between the ages of 4 and 8 years be restrained in booster seats. The implementation of a booster-seat law is generally thought to decrease the occurrence of injury to children. We hypothesized that appropriate restraint with booster seats would also cause a decrease in emergency department (ED) visits compared with children who were unrestrained. This is an important measure as ED visits are a surrogate marker for injury. OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this study was to look at the rate of ED visits between children in booster seats compared with those in other or no restraint systems involved in MVCs. Injury severity was compared across restraint types as a secondary outcome of booster-seat use after the implementation of a state law. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed including all children 4 to 8 years old involved in MVCs to which emergency medical services was dispatched. Ambulance services used a novel on-scene computer charting system for all MVC-related encounters to collect age, sex, child-restraint system, Glasgow Coma Scale score, injuries, and final disposition. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine children were studied with 58 children (35.6%) in booster seats, 73 children in seatbelts alone (45.2%), and 28 children (19.1%) in no restraint system. 76 children (47.7%), 74 by emergency medical services and 2 by private vehicle, were transported to the ED with no significant difference between restraint use (P = 0.534). Utilization of a restraint system did not significantly impact MVC injury severity. However, of those children who either died (n = 2) or had an on-scene decreased Glasgow Coma Scale score (n = 6), 75% (6/8) were not restrained in a booster seat. CONCLUSIONS: The use of booster-seat restraints does not appear to be associated with whether a child will be transported to the ED for trauma evaluation.

AB - BACKGROUND: Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) are the leading cause of death and disability among children older than 1 year. Many states currently mandate all children between the ages of 4 and 8 years be restrained in booster seats. The implementation of a booster-seat law is generally thought to decrease the occurrence of injury to children. We hypothesized that appropriate restraint with booster seats would also cause a decrease in emergency department (ED) visits compared with children who were unrestrained. This is an important measure as ED visits are a surrogate marker for injury. OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this study was to look at the rate of ED visits between children in booster seats compared with those in other or no restraint systems involved in MVCs. Injury severity was compared across restraint types as a secondary outcome of booster-seat use after the implementation of a state law. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed including all children 4 to 8 years old involved in MVCs to which emergency medical services was dispatched. Ambulance services used a novel on-scene computer charting system for all MVC-related encounters to collect age, sex, child-restraint system, Glasgow Coma Scale score, injuries, and final disposition. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine children were studied with 58 children (35.6%) in booster seats, 73 children in seatbelts alone (45.2%), and 28 children (19.1%) in no restraint system. 76 children (47.7%), 74 by emergency medical services and 2 by private vehicle, were transported to the ED with no significant difference between restraint use (P = 0.534). Utilization of a restraint system did not significantly impact MVC injury severity. However, of those children who either died (n = 2) or had an on-scene decreased Glasgow Coma Scale score (n = 6), 75% (6/8) were not restrained in a booster seat. CONCLUSIONS: The use of booster-seat restraints does not appear to be associated with whether a child will be transported to the ED for trauma evaluation.

KW - booster seats

KW - motor vehicle crash

KW - pediatric injury prevention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869509574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869509574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318271c0ef

DO - 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318271c0ef

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1211

EP - 1214

JO - Pediatric Emergency Care

JF - Pediatric Emergency Care

SN - 0749-5161

IS - 11

ER -