Emergency department workplace interruptions

Are emergency physicians 'interrupt-driven' and 'multitasking'?

C. D. Chisholm, E. K. Collison, D. R. Nelson, W. H. Cordell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

365 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Although interruptions have been shown in aviation and other work settings to result in error with serious and sometimes fatal consequences, little is known about interruptions in the emergency department (ED). The authors conducted an observational, time - motion task-analysis study to determine the number and types of interruptions in the ED. Methods: Emergency physicians were observed in three EDs located in an urban teaching hospital, a suburban private teaching hospital, and a rural community hospital. A single investigator followed emergency staff physicians for 180-minute periods and recorded tasks, interruptions, and breaks-in-task. An 'interruption' was defined as any event that briefly required the attention of the subject but did not result in switching to a new task. A 'break-in-task' was defined as an event that required the attention of the physician for more than 10 seconds and subsequently resulted in changing tasks. Results: The mean (±SD) total number of patients seen at all three sites during the 180-minute study period was 12.1 ± 3.7 patients (range 5-20). Physicians performed a mean of 67.6 ± 15.7 tasks per study period. The mean number of interruptions per 180-minute study period was 30.9 ± 9.7 and the mean number of breaks-in-task was 20.7 ± 6.3. Both the number of interruptions (r = 0.63; p < 0.001) and the number of breaks-in-task (r = 0.56; p < 0.001) per observation period were positively correlated with the average number of patients simultaneously managed. Conclusions: Emergency physicians are 'interrupt-driven.' Emergency physicians are frequently interrupted and many interruptions result in breaks-in-task.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1239-1243
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume7
Issue number11
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Workplace
Hospital Emergency Service
Emergencies
Physicians
Teaching Hospitals
Rural Hospitals
Aviation
Private Hospitals
Urban Hospitals
Community Hospital
Rural Population
Research Personnel
Observation

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Emergency medicine
  • Human engineering
  • Medical errors
  • Task performance and analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Chisholm, C. D., Collison, E. K., Nelson, D. R., & Cordell, W. H. (2000). Emergency department workplace interruptions: Are emergency physicians 'interrupt-driven' and 'multitasking'? Academic Emergency Medicine, 7(11), 1239-1243.

Emergency department workplace interruptions : Are emergency physicians 'interrupt-driven' and 'multitasking'? / Chisholm, C. D.; Collison, E. K.; Nelson, D. R.; Cordell, W. H.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 11, 2000, p. 1239-1243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chisholm, CD, Collison, EK, Nelson, DR & Cordell, WH 2000, 'Emergency department workplace interruptions: Are emergency physicians 'interrupt-driven' and 'multitasking'?', Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1239-1243.
Chisholm, C. D. ; Collison, E. K. ; Nelson, D. R. ; Cordell, W. H. / Emergency department workplace interruptions : Are emergency physicians 'interrupt-driven' and 'multitasking'?. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2000 ; Vol. 7, No. 11. pp. 1239-1243.
@article{0a03f52510654f048dd48c7853e53895,
title = "Emergency department workplace interruptions: Are emergency physicians 'interrupt-driven' and 'multitasking'?",
abstract = "Objective: Although interruptions have been shown in aviation and other work settings to result in error with serious and sometimes fatal consequences, little is known about interruptions in the emergency department (ED). The authors conducted an observational, time - motion task-analysis study to determine the number and types of interruptions in the ED. Methods: Emergency physicians were observed in three EDs located in an urban teaching hospital, a suburban private teaching hospital, and a rural community hospital. A single investigator followed emergency staff physicians for 180-minute periods and recorded tasks, interruptions, and breaks-in-task. An 'interruption' was defined as any event that briefly required the attention of the subject but did not result in switching to a new task. A 'break-in-task' was defined as an event that required the attention of the physician for more than 10 seconds and subsequently resulted in changing tasks. Results: The mean (±SD) total number of patients seen at all three sites during the 180-minute study period was 12.1 ± 3.7 patients (range 5-20). Physicians performed a mean of 67.6 ± 15.7 tasks per study period. The mean number of interruptions per 180-minute study period was 30.9 ± 9.7 and the mean number of breaks-in-task was 20.7 ± 6.3. Both the number of interruptions (r = 0.63; p < 0.001) and the number of breaks-in-task (r = 0.56; p < 0.001) per observation period were positively correlated with the average number of patients simultaneously managed. Conclusions: Emergency physicians are 'interrupt-driven.' Emergency physicians are frequently interrupted and many interruptions result in breaks-in-task.",
keywords = "Attention, Emergency medicine, Human engineering, Medical errors, Task performance and analysis",
author = "Chisholm, {C. D.} and Collison, {E. K.} and Nelson, {D. R.} and Cordell, {W. H.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "1239--1243",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency department workplace interruptions

T2 - Are emergency physicians 'interrupt-driven' and 'multitasking'?

AU - Chisholm, C. D.

AU - Collison, E. K.

AU - Nelson, D. R.

AU - Cordell, W. H.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Objective: Although interruptions have been shown in aviation and other work settings to result in error with serious and sometimes fatal consequences, little is known about interruptions in the emergency department (ED). The authors conducted an observational, time - motion task-analysis study to determine the number and types of interruptions in the ED. Methods: Emergency physicians were observed in three EDs located in an urban teaching hospital, a suburban private teaching hospital, and a rural community hospital. A single investigator followed emergency staff physicians for 180-minute periods and recorded tasks, interruptions, and breaks-in-task. An 'interruption' was defined as any event that briefly required the attention of the subject but did not result in switching to a new task. A 'break-in-task' was defined as an event that required the attention of the physician for more than 10 seconds and subsequently resulted in changing tasks. Results: The mean (±SD) total number of patients seen at all three sites during the 180-minute study period was 12.1 ± 3.7 patients (range 5-20). Physicians performed a mean of 67.6 ± 15.7 tasks per study period. The mean number of interruptions per 180-minute study period was 30.9 ± 9.7 and the mean number of breaks-in-task was 20.7 ± 6.3. Both the number of interruptions (r = 0.63; p < 0.001) and the number of breaks-in-task (r = 0.56; p < 0.001) per observation period were positively correlated with the average number of patients simultaneously managed. Conclusions: Emergency physicians are 'interrupt-driven.' Emergency physicians are frequently interrupted and many interruptions result in breaks-in-task.

AB - Objective: Although interruptions have been shown in aviation and other work settings to result in error with serious and sometimes fatal consequences, little is known about interruptions in the emergency department (ED). The authors conducted an observational, time - motion task-analysis study to determine the number and types of interruptions in the ED. Methods: Emergency physicians were observed in three EDs located in an urban teaching hospital, a suburban private teaching hospital, and a rural community hospital. A single investigator followed emergency staff physicians for 180-minute periods and recorded tasks, interruptions, and breaks-in-task. An 'interruption' was defined as any event that briefly required the attention of the subject but did not result in switching to a new task. A 'break-in-task' was defined as an event that required the attention of the physician for more than 10 seconds and subsequently resulted in changing tasks. Results: The mean (±SD) total number of patients seen at all three sites during the 180-minute study period was 12.1 ± 3.7 patients (range 5-20). Physicians performed a mean of 67.6 ± 15.7 tasks per study period. The mean number of interruptions per 180-minute study period was 30.9 ± 9.7 and the mean number of breaks-in-task was 20.7 ± 6.3. Both the number of interruptions (r = 0.63; p < 0.001) and the number of breaks-in-task (r = 0.56; p < 0.001) per observation period were positively correlated with the average number of patients simultaneously managed. Conclusions: Emergency physicians are 'interrupt-driven.' Emergency physicians are frequently interrupted and many interruptions result in breaks-in-task.

KW - Attention

KW - Emergency medicine

KW - Human engineering

KW - Medical errors

KW - Task performance and analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033757786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033757786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 1239

EP - 1243

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 11

ER -