Emerging trends in robotic pyeloplasty for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults

M. Francesca Monn, Clinton Bahler, Eric B. Schneider, Chandru Sundaram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated trends and associated characteristics in the use of robotics for pyeloplasty as treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Materials and Methods: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were used to evaluate pyeloplasty trends from 2005 to 2010. Patients treated with pyeloplasty and procedure method (robotic, laparoscopic or open) were identified by ICD-9-CM codes. Coding for robotics was initiated in the fourth quarter of 2008. Multivariable analysis was performed to examine characteristics affecting the odds of undergoing robotic pyeloplasty vs other approaches to pyeloplasty. Results: We identified 3,947 pyeloplasties performed between 2005 and 2010, including 1,642 since the fourth quarter of 2008. There was a statistically significant increase in the number of robotic pyeloplasties (p <0.001). Mean total charges for robotic vs nonrobotic procedures were $40,200 vs $37,817 (p = 0.106). Characteristics related to undergoing a robotic procedure included surgery at a teaching hospital (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.59, p = 0.021) and in the Northeast (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.17-2.04, p = 0.002) or Midwest (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.23-2.12, p <0.001) compared with the South. When the primary payer was Medicaid vs private insurance, patients were 46% less likely to undergo the procedure robotically (p <0.001). There was no significant difference in charges between robotic and open pyeloplasty. Conclusions: The number of robotic pyeloplasties performed quarterly in the United States is increasing, although there are disparities in the adoption of the robotic approach among geographic regions and hospital types.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1352-1357
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume189
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Robotics
Medicaid
International Classification of Diseases
Insurance
Teaching Hospitals
Inpatients

Keywords

  • kidney
  • laparoscopy
  • robotics
  • trends
  • ureteral obstruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Emerging trends in robotic pyeloplasty for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. / Monn, M. Francesca; Bahler, Clinton; Schneider, Eric B.; Sundaram, Chandru.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 189, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 1352-1357.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f1573eee8d5d4cca88b1e48c48594304,
title = "Emerging trends in robotic pyeloplasty for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults",
abstract = "Purpose: We evaluated trends and associated characteristics in the use of robotics for pyeloplasty as treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Materials and Methods: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were used to evaluate pyeloplasty trends from 2005 to 2010. Patients treated with pyeloplasty and procedure method (robotic, laparoscopic or open) were identified by ICD-9-CM codes. Coding for robotics was initiated in the fourth quarter of 2008. Multivariable analysis was performed to examine characteristics affecting the odds of undergoing robotic pyeloplasty vs other approaches to pyeloplasty. Results: We identified 3,947 pyeloplasties performed between 2005 and 2010, including 1,642 since the fourth quarter of 2008. There was a statistically significant increase in the number of robotic pyeloplasties (p <0.001). Mean total charges for robotic vs nonrobotic procedures were $40,200 vs $37,817 (p = 0.106). Characteristics related to undergoing a robotic procedure included surgery at a teaching hospital (OR 1.29, 95{\%} CI 1.04-1.59, p = 0.021) and in the Northeast (OR 1.54, 95{\%} CI 1.17-2.04, p = 0.002) or Midwest (OR 1.62, 95{\%} CI 1.23-2.12, p <0.001) compared with the South. When the primary payer was Medicaid vs private insurance, patients were 46{\%} less likely to undergo the procedure robotically (p <0.001). There was no significant difference in charges between robotic and open pyeloplasty. Conclusions: The number of robotic pyeloplasties performed quarterly in the United States is increasing, although there are disparities in the adoption of the robotic approach among geographic regions and hospital types.",
keywords = "kidney, laparoscopy, robotics, trends, ureteral obstruction",
author = "Monn, {M. Francesca} and Clinton Bahler and Schneider, {Eric B.} and Chandru Sundaram",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.001",
language = "English",
volume = "189",
pages = "1352--1357",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emerging trends in robotic pyeloplasty for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults

AU - Monn, M. Francesca

AU - Bahler, Clinton

AU - Schneider, Eric B.

AU - Sundaram, Chandru

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Purpose: We evaluated trends and associated characteristics in the use of robotics for pyeloplasty as treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Materials and Methods: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were used to evaluate pyeloplasty trends from 2005 to 2010. Patients treated with pyeloplasty and procedure method (robotic, laparoscopic or open) were identified by ICD-9-CM codes. Coding for robotics was initiated in the fourth quarter of 2008. Multivariable analysis was performed to examine characteristics affecting the odds of undergoing robotic pyeloplasty vs other approaches to pyeloplasty. Results: We identified 3,947 pyeloplasties performed between 2005 and 2010, including 1,642 since the fourth quarter of 2008. There was a statistically significant increase in the number of robotic pyeloplasties (p <0.001). Mean total charges for robotic vs nonrobotic procedures were $40,200 vs $37,817 (p = 0.106). Characteristics related to undergoing a robotic procedure included surgery at a teaching hospital (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.59, p = 0.021) and in the Northeast (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.17-2.04, p = 0.002) or Midwest (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.23-2.12, p <0.001) compared with the South. When the primary payer was Medicaid vs private insurance, patients were 46% less likely to undergo the procedure robotically (p <0.001). There was no significant difference in charges between robotic and open pyeloplasty. Conclusions: The number of robotic pyeloplasties performed quarterly in the United States is increasing, although there are disparities in the adoption of the robotic approach among geographic regions and hospital types.

AB - Purpose: We evaluated trends and associated characteristics in the use of robotics for pyeloplasty as treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Materials and Methods: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were used to evaluate pyeloplasty trends from 2005 to 2010. Patients treated with pyeloplasty and procedure method (robotic, laparoscopic or open) were identified by ICD-9-CM codes. Coding for robotics was initiated in the fourth quarter of 2008. Multivariable analysis was performed to examine characteristics affecting the odds of undergoing robotic pyeloplasty vs other approaches to pyeloplasty. Results: We identified 3,947 pyeloplasties performed between 2005 and 2010, including 1,642 since the fourth quarter of 2008. There was a statistically significant increase in the number of robotic pyeloplasties (p <0.001). Mean total charges for robotic vs nonrobotic procedures were $40,200 vs $37,817 (p = 0.106). Characteristics related to undergoing a robotic procedure included surgery at a teaching hospital (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.59, p = 0.021) and in the Northeast (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.17-2.04, p = 0.002) or Midwest (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.23-2.12, p <0.001) compared with the South. When the primary payer was Medicaid vs private insurance, patients were 46% less likely to undergo the procedure robotically (p <0.001). There was no significant difference in charges between robotic and open pyeloplasty. Conclusions: The number of robotic pyeloplasties performed quarterly in the United States is increasing, although there are disparities in the adoption of the robotic approach among geographic regions and hospital types.

KW - kidney

KW - laparoscopy

KW - robotics

KW - trends

KW - ureteral obstruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875916745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875916745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 23063631

AN - SCOPUS:84875916745

VL - 189

SP - 1352

EP - 1357

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4

ER -