Endobronchial ultrasound

Francis Sheski, Praveen N. Mathur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FB), a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is sampled by means of transbronehial needle aspiration (TBNA), brush, or transbronehial lung biopsy under fluoroscopy; and mediastinal lymph nodes are sampled using "blind" TBNA. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) was developed to help visualize the lesion at the time of biopsy in order to improve the diagnostic yield. Methods: There are two types of EBUS techniques: using a radial probe (RP) with a rotating transducer at the distal tip, which produces a 360° image to the long axis of the bronchoscope; and using an EBUS bronchoscope with a linear transducer at its distal tip, producing a 50° image parallel to its long axis. Results: In biopsies of SPNs < 2 cm using an RP, EBUS demonstrates a higher diagnostic yield than conventional FB techniques. With mediastinal and hilar nodal stations, except for the subcarina, EBUS shows a higher yield over blind TBNA. The current procedural terminology code for EBUS is 31620, a "ZZZ" code submitted in addition to other performed procedures (31622-31638). In 2007, an estimate of physician Medicare reimbursement for EBUS is $70.49. Reimbursement is locality dependent and based on economic-exchange conversion factors. Incorporating an ultrasound image into the report substantiates the use of this technique. Limitations: The physician must learn ultrasound image interpretation and the EBUS technique, and be skilled in TBNA. Maintaining competency requires frequent performance of EBUS. Conclusion: EBUS-directed biopsy improves the yield over conventional FB for SPNs < 2 cm and for most mediastinal or hilar nodal stations. This reduces the need to conduct additional diagnostic procedures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)264-270
Number of pages7
JournalChest
Volume133
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008

Fingerprint

Needles
Bronchoscopy
Biopsy
Bronchoscopes
Transducers
Current Procedural Terminology
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule
Physicians
Fluoroscopy
Medicare
Lymph Nodes
Economics
Lung

Keywords

  • Bronchoscopy
  • Endobronchial ultrasound
  • Interventional pulmonology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Endobronchial ultrasound. / Sheski, Francis; Mathur, Praveen N.

In: Chest, Vol. 133, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 264-270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sheski, F & Mathur, PN 2008, 'Endobronchial ultrasound', Chest, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 264-270. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.06-1735
Sheski, Francis ; Mathur, Praveen N. / Endobronchial ultrasound. In: Chest. 2008 ; Vol. 133, No. 1. pp. 264-270.
@article{a68efaf7c6e5496eaee8daf3e033800e,
title = "Endobronchial ultrasound",
abstract = "During flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FB), a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is sampled by means of transbronehial needle aspiration (TBNA), brush, or transbronehial lung biopsy under fluoroscopy; and mediastinal lymph nodes are sampled using {"}blind{"} TBNA. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) was developed to help visualize the lesion at the time of biopsy in order to improve the diagnostic yield. Methods: There are two types of EBUS techniques: using a radial probe (RP) with a rotating transducer at the distal tip, which produces a 360° image to the long axis of the bronchoscope; and using an EBUS bronchoscope with a linear transducer at its distal tip, producing a 50° image parallel to its long axis. Results: In biopsies of SPNs < 2 cm using an RP, EBUS demonstrates a higher diagnostic yield than conventional FB techniques. With mediastinal and hilar nodal stations, except for the subcarina, EBUS shows a higher yield over blind TBNA. The current procedural terminology code for EBUS is 31620, a {"}ZZZ{"} code submitted in addition to other performed procedures (31622-31638). In 2007, an estimate of physician Medicare reimbursement for EBUS is $70.49. Reimbursement is locality dependent and based on economic-exchange conversion factors. Incorporating an ultrasound image into the report substantiates the use of this technique. Limitations: The physician must learn ultrasound image interpretation and the EBUS technique, and be skilled in TBNA. Maintaining competency requires frequent performance of EBUS. Conclusion: EBUS-directed biopsy improves the yield over conventional FB for SPNs < 2 cm and for most mediastinal or hilar nodal stations. This reduces the need to conduct additional diagnostic procedures.",
keywords = "Bronchoscopy, Endobronchial ultrasound, Interventional pulmonology",
author = "Francis Sheski and Mathur, {Praveen N.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1378/chest.06-1735",
language = "English",
volume = "133",
pages = "264--270",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endobronchial ultrasound

AU - Sheski, Francis

AU - Mathur, Praveen N.

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - During flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FB), a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is sampled by means of transbronehial needle aspiration (TBNA), brush, or transbronehial lung biopsy under fluoroscopy; and mediastinal lymph nodes are sampled using "blind" TBNA. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) was developed to help visualize the lesion at the time of biopsy in order to improve the diagnostic yield. Methods: There are two types of EBUS techniques: using a radial probe (RP) with a rotating transducer at the distal tip, which produces a 360° image to the long axis of the bronchoscope; and using an EBUS bronchoscope with a linear transducer at its distal tip, producing a 50° image parallel to its long axis. Results: In biopsies of SPNs < 2 cm using an RP, EBUS demonstrates a higher diagnostic yield than conventional FB techniques. With mediastinal and hilar nodal stations, except for the subcarina, EBUS shows a higher yield over blind TBNA. The current procedural terminology code for EBUS is 31620, a "ZZZ" code submitted in addition to other performed procedures (31622-31638). In 2007, an estimate of physician Medicare reimbursement for EBUS is $70.49. Reimbursement is locality dependent and based on economic-exchange conversion factors. Incorporating an ultrasound image into the report substantiates the use of this technique. Limitations: The physician must learn ultrasound image interpretation and the EBUS technique, and be skilled in TBNA. Maintaining competency requires frequent performance of EBUS. Conclusion: EBUS-directed biopsy improves the yield over conventional FB for SPNs < 2 cm and for most mediastinal or hilar nodal stations. This reduces the need to conduct additional diagnostic procedures.

AB - During flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FB), a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is sampled by means of transbronehial needle aspiration (TBNA), brush, or transbronehial lung biopsy under fluoroscopy; and mediastinal lymph nodes are sampled using "blind" TBNA. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) was developed to help visualize the lesion at the time of biopsy in order to improve the diagnostic yield. Methods: There are two types of EBUS techniques: using a radial probe (RP) with a rotating transducer at the distal tip, which produces a 360° image to the long axis of the bronchoscope; and using an EBUS bronchoscope with a linear transducer at its distal tip, producing a 50° image parallel to its long axis. Results: In biopsies of SPNs < 2 cm using an RP, EBUS demonstrates a higher diagnostic yield than conventional FB techniques. With mediastinal and hilar nodal stations, except for the subcarina, EBUS shows a higher yield over blind TBNA. The current procedural terminology code for EBUS is 31620, a "ZZZ" code submitted in addition to other performed procedures (31622-31638). In 2007, an estimate of physician Medicare reimbursement for EBUS is $70.49. Reimbursement is locality dependent and based on economic-exchange conversion factors. Incorporating an ultrasound image into the report substantiates the use of this technique. Limitations: The physician must learn ultrasound image interpretation and the EBUS technique, and be skilled in TBNA. Maintaining competency requires frequent performance of EBUS. Conclusion: EBUS-directed biopsy improves the yield over conventional FB for SPNs < 2 cm and for most mediastinal or hilar nodal stations. This reduces the need to conduct additional diagnostic procedures.

KW - Bronchoscopy

KW - Endobronchial ultrasound

KW - Interventional pulmonology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38349022397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38349022397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1378/chest.06-1735

DO - 10.1378/chest.06-1735

M3 - Article

VL - 133

SP - 264

EP - 270

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 1

ER -