Enhancement of expressive language in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants

Richard Miyamoto, Mario A. Svirsky, Amy M. Robbins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Expressive language skills were assessed in two groups of prelingually-deafened children using the Reynell Developmental Language Scales (RDLS). Results from a group of 89 unimplanted subjects provided cross-sectional data which suggested that profoundly deaf children without implants, on average, could only be expected to make 5 months of expressive language growth in one year. Twenty-three children who received cochlear implants made up the second group of subjects and were administered the RDLS at three intervals: preimplant, 6-, and 12-months postimplant. The scores obtained at the post-implant intervals were then compared to scores that would be predicted on the basis of maturation alone, without the implant (these predictions were formulated based on the data obtained from the unimplanted subjects). At the 12-month postimplant interval, the observed mean language score was significantly higher than the predicted score. Although the mean group data were extremely encouraging, wide inter-subject variability was observed. Although the implant subjects, as a group, were substantially delayed compared with their normal hearing peers, their rate of language growth was found to match that of hearing peers, following implantation. Thus, the gap between chronological age and language age, which normally widens over time in deaf children, remained constant. Preliminary analyses over the first 2.5 years post-implant are consistent with this trend. These results suggest that early implantation (before age 3) might be beneficial to profoundly deaf children because the language delays at the time of implantation would be much smaller.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)154-157
Number of pages4
JournalActa Oto-Laryngologica
Volume117
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implants
Language
Hearing
Language Development Disorders
Child Language
Growth

Keywords

  • cochlear implants
  • language development
  • pediatric
  • prelingual deafness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Enhancement of expressive language in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants. / Miyamoto, Richard; Svirsky, Mario A.; Robbins, Amy M.

In: Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Vol. 117, No. 2, 1997, p. 154-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miyamoto, Richard ; Svirsky, Mario A. ; Robbins, Amy M. / Enhancement of expressive language in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants. In: Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 1997 ; Vol. 117, No. 2. pp. 154-157.
@article{fb118c83f6a04755938b2fa612b25dc5,
title = "Enhancement of expressive language in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants",
abstract = "Expressive language skills were assessed in two groups of prelingually-deafened children using the Reynell Developmental Language Scales (RDLS). Results from a group of 89 unimplanted subjects provided cross-sectional data which suggested that profoundly deaf children without implants, on average, could only be expected to make 5 months of expressive language growth in one year. Twenty-three children who received cochlear implants made up the second group of subjects and were administered the RDLS at three intervals: preimplant, 6-, and 12-months postimplant. The scores obtained at the post-implant intervals were then compared to scores that would be predicted on the basis of maturation alone, without the implant (these predictions were formulated based on the data obtained from the unimplanted subjects). At the 12-month postimplant interval, the observed mean language score was significantly higher than the predicted score. Although the mean group data were extremely encouraging, wide inter-subject variability was observed. Although the implant subjects, as a group, were substantially delayed compared with their normal hearing peers, their rate of language growth was found to match that of hearing peers, following implantation. Thus, the gap between chronological age and language age, which normally widens over time in deaf children, remained constant. Preliminary analyses over the first 2.5 years post-implant are consistent with this trend. These results suggest that early implantation (before age 3) might be beneficial to profoundly deaf children because the language delays at the time of implantation would be much smaller.",
keywords = "cochlear implants, language development, pediatric, prelingual deafness",
author = "Richard Miyamoto and Svirsky, {Mario A.} and Robbins, {Amy M.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
pages = "154--157",
journal = "Acta Oto-Laryngologica",
issn = "0001-6489",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enhancement of expressive language in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants

AU - Miyamoto, Richard

AU - Svirsky, Mario A.

AU - Robbins, Amy M.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Expressive language skills were assessed in two groups of prelingually-deafened children using the Reynell Developmental Language Scales (RDLS). Results from a group of 89 unimplanted subjects provided cross-sectional data which suggested that profoundly deaf children without implants, on average, could only be expected to make 5 months of expressive language growth in one year. Twenty-three children who received cochlear implants made up the second group of subjects and were administered the RDLS at three intervals: preimplant, 6-, and 12-months postimplant. The scores obtained at the post-implant intervals were then compared to scores that would be predicted on the basis of maturation alone, without the implant (these predictions were formulated based on the data obtained from the unimplanted subjects). At the 12-month postimplant interval, the observed mean language score was significantly higher than the predicted score. Although the mean group data were extremely encouraging, wide inter-subject variability was observed. Although the implant subjects, as a group, were substantially delayed compared with their normal hearing peers, their rate of language growth was found to match that of hearing peers, following implantation. Thus, the gap between chronological age and language age, which normally widens over time in deaf children, remained constant. Preliminary analyses over the first 2.5 years post-implant are consistent with this trend. These results suggest that early implantation (before age 3) might be beneficial to profoundly deaf children because the language delays at the time of implantation would be much smaller.

AB - Expressive language skills were assessed in two groups of prelingually-deafened children using the Reynell Developmental Language Scales (RDLS). Results from a group of 89 unimplanted subjects provided cross-sectional data which suggested that profoundly deaf children without implants, on average, could only be expected to make 5 months of expressive language growth in one year. Twenty-three children who received cochlear implants made up the second group of subjects and were administered the RDLS at three intervals: preimplant, 6-, and 12-months postimplant. The scores obtained at the post-implant intervals were then compared to scores that would be predicted on the basis of maturation alone, without the implant (these predictions were formulated based on the data obtained from the unimplanted subjects). At the 12-month postimplant interval, the observed mean language score was significantly higher than the predicted score. Although the mean group data were extremely encouraging, wide inter-subject variability was observed. Although the implant subjects, as a group, were substantially delayed compared with their normal hearing peers, their rate of language growth was found to match that of hearing peers, following implantation. Thus, the gap between chronological age and language age, which normally widens over time in deaf children, remained constant. Preliminary analyses over the first 2.5 years post-implant are consistent with this trend. These results suggest that early implantation (before age 3) might be beneficial to profoundly deaf children because the language delays at the time of implantation would be much smaller.

KW - cochlear implants

KW - language development

KW - pediatric

KW - prelingual deafness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030899646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030899646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 117

SP - 154

EP - 157

JO - Acta Oto-Laryngologica

JF - Acta Oto-Laryngologica

SN - 0001-6489

IS - 2

ER -