Ethical implications of modifying lethal injection protocols

Leonidas Koniaris, Kenneth W. Goodman, Jeremy Sugarman, Uzoezi Ozomaro, Jonathan Sheldon, Teresa Zimmers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lethal injection for execution has largely replaced other execution methods, in part due to the appearance of a peaceful death; however, available evidence indicates that some inmates actually suffer extreme pain. This has triggered legal challenges against lethal injection on the grounds that it violates the United States' constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Some jurisdictions collect comprehensive data on executions and outcomes, and some have modified their lethal injection protocols. Recently, jurists and lethal injection advisory panels have recommended specific changes to be instituted for future executions. Such use of biomedical inquiry to evaluate, modify, and "improve" protocols resembles human experimentation and should be scrutinized against accepted norms for ethical conduct of research, particularly given the vulnerable nature of the prisoner population. Although the regulations governing prisoner research vary byjurisdiction, the ethical framework for the modification of lethal injection protocols should be made clear prior to further investigation into how to "improve the process".

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)845-849
Number of pages5
JournalPLoS Medicine
Volume5
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Capital Punishment
Prisoners
Human Experimentation
Punishment
Research
Pain
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Ethical implications of modifying lethal injection protocols. / Koniaris, Leonidas; Goodman, Kenneth W.; Sugarman, Jeremy; Ozomaro, Uzoezi; Sheldon, Jonathan; Zimmers, Teresa.

In: PLoS Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 6, 06.2008, p. 845-849.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Koniaris, Leonidas ; Goodman, Kenneth W. ; Sugarman, Jeremy ; Ozomaro, Uzoezi ; Sheldon, Jonathan ; Zimmers, Teresa. / Ethical implications of modifying lethal injection protocols. In: PLoS Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 5, No. 6. pp. 845-849.
@article{eacc8ad146324b5aa9daf2feef2da87c,
title = "Ethical implications of modifying lethal injection protocols",
abstract = "Lethal injection for execution has largely replaced other execution methods, in part due to the appearance of a peaceful death; however, available evidence indicates that some inmates actually suffer extreme pain. This has triggered legal challenges against lethal injection on the grounds that it violates the United States' constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Some jurisdictions collect comprehensive data on executions and outcomes, and some have modified their lethal injection protocols. Recently, jurists and lethal injection advisory panels have recommended specific changes to be instituted for future executions. Such use of biomedical inquiry to evaluate, modify, and {"}improve{"} protocols resembles human experimentation and should be scrutinized against accepted norms for ethical conduct of research, particularly given the vulnerable nature of the prisoner population. Although the regulations governing prisoner research vary byjurisdiction, the ethical framework for the modification of lethal injection protocols should be made clear prior to further investigation into how to {"}improve the process{"}.",
author = "Leonidas Koniaris and Goodman, {Kenneth W.} and Jeremy Sugarman and Uzoezi Ozomaro and Jonathan Sheldon and Teresa Zimmers",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pmed.0050126",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "845--849",
journal = "PLoS Medicine",
issn = "1549-1277",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical implications of modifying lethal injection protocols

AU - Koniaris, Leonidas

AU - Goodman, Kenneth W.

AU - Sugarman, Jeremy

AU - Ozomaro, Uzoezi

AU - Sheldon, Jonathan

AU - Zimmers, Teresa

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Lethal injection for execution has largely replaced other execution methods, in part due to the appearance of a peaceful death; however, available evidence indicates that some inmates actually suffer extreme pain. This has triggered legal challenges against lethal injection on the grounds that it violates the United States' constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Some jurisdictions collect comprehensive data on executions and outcomes, and some have modified their lethal injection protocols. Recently, jurists and lethal injection advisory panels have recommended specific changes to be instituted for future executions. Such use of biomedical inquiry to evaluate, modify, and "improve" protocols resembles human experimentation and should be scrutinized against accepted norms for ethical conduct of research, particularly given the vulnerable nature of the prisoner population. Although the regulations governing prisoner research vary byjurisdiction, the ethical framework for the modification of lethal injection protocols should be made clear prior to further investigation into how to "improve the process".

AB - Lethal injection for execution has largely replaced other execution methods, in part due to the appearance of a peaceful death; however, available evidence indicates that some inmates actually suffer extreme pain. This has triggered legal challenges against lethal injection on the grounds that it violates the United States' constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Some jurisdictions collect comprehensive data on executions and outcomes, and some have modified their lethal injection protocols. Recently, jurists and lethal injection advisory panels have recommended specific changes to be instituted for future executions. Such use of biomedical inquiry to evaluate, modify, and "improve" protocols resembles human experimentation and should be scrutinized against accepted norms for ethical conduct of research, particularly given the vulnerable nature of the prisoner population. Although the regulations governing prisoner research vary byjurisdiction, the ethical framework for the modification of lethal injection protocols should be made clear prior to further investigation into how to "improve the process".

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46749102924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46749102924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050126

DO - 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050126

M3 - Article

C2 - 18547139

AN - SCOPUS:46749102924

VL - 5

SP - 845

EP - 849

JO - PLoS Medicine

JF - PLoS Medicine

SN - 1549-1277

IS - 6

ER -