Evaluating congruence between laboratory LOINC value sets for quality measures, public health reporting, and mapping common tests.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Laboratory test results are important for secondary data uses like quality measures and public health reporting, but mapping local laboratory codes to LOINC is a challenge. We evaluated the congruence between laboratory LOINC value sets for quality measures, public health reporting, and mapping common tests. We found a modest proportion of the LOINC codes from the Value Set Authority Center (VSAC) were present in the LOINC Top 2000 Results (16%) and the Reportable Condition Mapping Table (52%), and only 25 terms (3%) were shared with the Notifiable Condition Detector Top 129. More than a third of the VSAC Quality LOINCs were unique to that value set. A relatively small proportion of the VSAC Quality LOINCs were used by our hospital laboratories. Our results illustrate how mapping based only on test frequency might hinder these secondary uses of laboratory test results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1525-1532
Number of pages8
JournalAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium
Volume2013
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes
Public Health
Hospital Laboratories

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{ed0d64f71cec42b2bf34d30e92c251ad,
title = "Evaluating congruence between laboratory LOINC value sets for quality measures, public health reporting, and mapping common tests.",
abstract = "Laboratory test results are important for secondary data uses like quality measures and public health reporting, but mapping local laboratory codes to LOINC is a challenge. We evaluated the congruence between laboratory LOINC value sets for quality measures, public health reporting, and mapping common tests. We found a modest proportion of the LOINC codes from the Value Set Authority Center (VSAC) were present in the LOINC Top 2000 Results (16{\%}) and the Reportable Condition Mapping Table (52{\%}), and only 25 terms (3{\%}) were shared with the Notifiable Condition Detector Top 129. More than a third of the VSAC Quality LOINCs were unique to that value set. A relatively small proportion of the VSAC Quality LOINCs were used by our hospital laboratories. Our results illustrate how mapping based only on test frequency might hinder these secondary uses of laboratory test results.",
author = "Jianmin Wu and John Finnell and Daniel Vreeman",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "2013",
pages = "1525--1532",
journal = "AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium",
issn = "1559-4076",
publisher = "American Medical Informatics Association",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating congruence between laboratory LOINC value sets for quality measures, public health reporting, and mapping common tests.

AU - Wu, Jianmin

AU - Finnell, John

AU - Vreeman, Daniel

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Laboratory test results are important for secondary data uses like quality measures and public health reporting, but mapping local laboratory codes to LOINC is a challenge. We evaluated the congruence between laboratory LOINC value sets for quality measures, public health reporting, and mapping common tests. We found a modest proportion of the LOINC codes from the Value Set Authority Center (VSAC) were present in the LOINC Top 2000 Results (16%) and the Reportable Condition Mapping Table (52%), and only 25 terms (3%) were shared with the Notifiable Condition Detector Top 129. More than a third of the VSAC Quality LOINCs were unique to that value set. A relatively small proportion of the VSAC Quality LOINCs were used by our hospital laboratories. Our results illustrate how mapping based only on test frequency might hinder these secondary uses of laboratory test results.

AB - Laboratory test results are important for secondary data uses like quality measures and public health reporting, but mapping local laboratory codes to LOINC is a challenge. We evaluated the congruence between laboratory LOINC value sets for quality measures, public health reporting, and mapping common tests. We found a modest proportion of the LOINC codes from the Value Set Authority Center (VSAC) were present in the LOINC Top 2000 Results (16%) and the Reportable Condition Mapping Table (52%), and only 25 terms (3%) were shared with the Notifiable Condition Detector Top 129. More than a third of the VSAC Quality LOINCs were unique to that value set. A relatively small proportion of the VSAC Quality LOINCs were used by our hospital laboratories. Our results illustrate how mapping based only on test frequency might hinder these secondary uses of laboratory test results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901255144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901255144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 24551424

AN - SCOPUS:84901255144

VL - 2013

SP - 1525

EP - 1532

JO - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium

JF - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium

SN - 1559-4076

ER -