Evaluating ethical sensitivity in medical students: using vignettes as an instrument

P. Hebert, E. M. Meslin, N. Byrne, S. Ross Reid, E. V. Dunn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As a preliminary step to beginning to assess the usefulness of clinical vignettes to measure ethical sensitivity in undergraduate medical students, five clinical vignettes with seven to nine ethical issues each were created. The ethical issues in the vignettes were discussed and outlined by an expert panel. One randomly selected vignette was presented to first, second and third year students at the University of Toronto as part of another examination. The students were asked to list the issues presented by the paint problem. Responses from 281 students were obtained. These students identified an average of 2.72 ethical issues per vignette. Each response was classified under the domains of autonomy, beneficence and justice. Comparisons were made between classes and between vignettes. There was considerable variation between classes and the responses to different vignettes seem to indicate that different vignettes measure the various domains in different ways. It does appear that the use of vignettes is one way to measure aspects of ethical sensitivity in medical students but more study is required to clarify exactly what is being measured.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141-145
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

Fingerprint

Medical Students
medical student
Ethics
Students
student
Beneficence
Paint
Social Justice
autonomy
justice
expert
examination
Vignettes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Evaluating ethical sensitivity in medical students : using vignettes as an instrument. / Hebert, P.; Meslin, E. M.; Byrne, N.; Ross Reid, S.; Dunn, E. V.

In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.01.1990, p. 141-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hebert, P, Meslin, EM, Byrne, N, Ross Reid, S & Dunn, EV 1990, 'Evaluating ethical sensitivity in medical students: using vignettes as an instrument', Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 141-145. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.16.3.141
Hebert, P. ; Meslin, E. M. ; Byrne, N. ; Ross Reid, S. ; Dunn, E. V. / Evaluating ethical sensitivity in medical students : using vignettes as an instrument. In: Journal of Medical Ethics. 1990 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 141-145.
@article{61bd94016c95400f97fa94e720623e83,
title = "Evaluating ethical sensitivity in medical students: using vignettes as an instrument",
abstract = "As a preliminary step to beginning to assess the usefulness of clinical vignettes to measure ethical sensitivity in undergraduate medical students, five clinical vignettes with seven to nine ethical issues each were created. The ethical issues in the vignettes were discussed and outlined by an expert panel. One randomly selected vignette was presented to first, second and third year students at the University of Toronto as part of another examination. The students were asked to list the issues presented by the paint problem. Responses from 281 students were obtained. These students identified an average of 2.72 ethical issues per vignette. Each response was classified under the domains of autonomy, beneficence and justice. Comparisons were made between classes and between vignettes. There was considerable variation between classes and the responses to different vignettes seem to indicate that different vignettes measure the various domains in different ways. It does appear that the use of vignettes is one way to measure aspects of ethical sensitivity in medical students but more study is required to clarify exactly what is being measured.",
author = "P. Hebert and Meslin, {E. M.} and N. Byrne and {Ross Reid}, S. and Dunn, {E. V.}",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/jme.16.3.141",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "141--145",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating ethical sensitivity in medical students

T2 - using vignettes as an instrument

AU - Hebert, P.

AU - Meslin, E. M.

AU - Byrne, N.

AU - Ross Reid, S.

AU - Dunn, E. V.

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - As a preliminary step to beginning to assess the usefulness of clinical vignettes to measure ethical sensitivity in undergraduate medical students, five clinical vignettes with seven to nine ethical issues each were created. The ethical issues in the vignettes were discussed and outlined by an expert panel. One randomly selected vignette was presented to first, second and third year students at the University of Toronto as part of another examination. The students were asked to list the issues presented by the paint problem. Responses from 281 students were obtained. These students identified an average of 2.72 ethical issues per vignette. Each response was classified under the domains of autonomy, beneficence and justice. Comparisons were made between classes and between vignettes. There was considerable variation between classes and the responses to different vignettes seem to indicate that different vignettes measure the various domains in different ways. It does appear that the use of vignettes is one way to measure aspects of ethical sensitivity in medical students but more study is required to clarify exactly what is being measured.

AB - As a preliminary step to beginning to assess the usefulness of clinical vignettes to measure ethical sensitivity in undergraduate medical students, five clinical vignettes with seven to nine ethical issues each were created. The ethical issues in the vignettes were discussed and outlined by an expert panel. One randomly selected vignette was presented to first, second and third year students at the University of Toronto as part of another examination. The students were asked to list the issues presented by the paint problem. Responses from 281 students were obtained. These students identified an average of 2.72 ethical issues per vignette. Each response was classified under the domains of autonomy, beneficence and justice. Comparisons were made between classes and between vignettes. There was considerable variation between classes and the responses to different vignettes seem to indicate that different vignettes measure the various domains in different ways. It does appear that the use of vignettes is one way to measure aspects of ethical sensitivity in medical students but more study is required to clarify exactly what is being measured.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025125127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025125127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/jme.16.3.141

DO - 10.1136/jme.16.3.141

M3 - Article

C2 - 2231639

AN - SCOPUS:0025125127

VL - 16

SP - 141

EP - 145

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 3

ER -