Evaluating generalist education programs - A conceptual framework

Lisa V. Rubenstein, Arlene Fink, Lillian Gelberg, Carol Berkowitz, Alan Robbins, Thomas Inui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper provides and applies a conceptual framework and a list of guiding principles for evaluation of generalist education programs. Programs are systematic efforts to achieve specified objectives. Evaluations gather data in order to improve or appraise programs and have a continuum of purposes and methods. Descriptive evaluations characterize the structures, processes, and outcomes of programs; research evaluations definitively assess the effectiveness of a program in terms of outcomes. Intermediate outcomes are changes in knowledge, attitudes, and skills of program participants; conclusive outcomes reflect the quality of performance of graduates in actual clinical situations. Outcomes are affected by inputs-the qualities of students entering the program. Guiding principles of program evaluation ensure that data gathered are useful. The authors illustrate the guiding principles with an actual pilot study that determined that expert pediatricians, general internists, and family practitioners could agree on key generalist competencies and that explores evaluation design based on these competencies. Finally, they consider the implications of undertaking generalist education evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume9
Issue number1 Supplement
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Education
Program Evaluation
Students

Keywords

  • generalist
  • generalist competencies
  • program evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Rubenstein, L. V., Fink, A., Gelberg, L., Berkowitz, C., Robbins, A., & Inui, T. (1994). Evaluating generalist education programs - A conceptual framework. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 9(1 Supplement). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598120

Evaluating generalist education programs - A conceptual framework. / Rubenstein, Lisa V.; Fink, Arlene; Gelberg, Lillian; Berkowitz, Carol; Robbins, Alan; Inui, Thomas.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 1 Supplement, 04.1994.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rubenstein, LV, Fink, A, Gelberg, L, Berkowitz, C, Robbins, A & Inui, T 1994, 'Evaluating generalist education programs - A conceptual framework', Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 9, no. 1 Supplement. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598120
Rubenstein, Lisa V. ; Fink, Arlene ; Gelberg, Lillian ; Berkowitz, Carol ; Robbins, Alan ; Inui, Thomas. / Evaluating generalist education programs - A conceptual framework. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1994 ; Vol. 9, No. 1 Supplement.
@article{e256c747e68f4fe0876c0ba589823ff8,
title = "Evaluating generalist education programs - A conceptual framework",
abstract = "This paper provides and applies a conceptual framework and a list of guiding principles for evaluation of generalist education programs. Programs are systematic efforts to achieve specified objectives. Evaluations gather data in order to improve or appraise programs and have a continuum of purposes and methods. Descriptive evaluations characterize the structures, processes, and outcomes of programs; research evaluations definitively assess the effectiveness of a program in terms of outcomes. Intermediate outcomes are changes in knowledge, attitudes, and skills of program participants; conclusive outcomes reflect the quality of performance of graduates in actual clinical situations. Outcomes are affected by inputs-the qualities of students entering the program. Guiding principles of program evaluation ensure that data gathered are useful. The authors illustrate the guiding principles with an actual pilot study that determined that expert pediatricians, general internists, and family practitioners could agree on key generalist competencies and that explores evaluation design based on these competencies. Finally, they consider the implications of undertaking generalist education evaluation.",
keywords = "generalist, generalist competencies, program evaluation",
author = "Rubenstein, {Lisa V.} and Arlene Fink and Lillian Gelberg and Carol Berkowitz and Alan Robbins and Thomas Inui",
year = "1994",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/BF02598120",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1 Supplement",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating generalist education programs - A conceptual framework

AU - Rubenstein, Lisa V.

AU - Fink, Arlene

AU - Gelberg, Lillian

AU - Berkowitz, Carol

AU - Robbins, Alan

AU - Inui, Thomas

PY - 1994/4

Y1 - 1994/4

N2 - This paper provides and applies a conceptual framework and a list of guiding principles for evaluation of generalist education programs. Programs are systematic efforts to achieve specified objectives. Evaluations gather data in order to improve or appraise programs and have a continuum of purposes and methods. Descriptive evaluations characterize the structures, processes, and outcomes of programs; research evaluations definitively assess the effectiveness of a program in terms of outcomes. Intermediate outcomes are changes in knowledge, attitudes, and skills of program participants; conclusive outcomes reflect the quality of performance of graduates in actual clinical situations. Outcomes are affected by inputs-the qualities of students entering the program. Guiding principles of program evaluation ensure that data gathered are useful. The authors illustrate the guiding principles with an actual pilot study that determined that expert pediatricians, general internists, and family practitioners could agree on key generalist competencies and that explores evaluation design based on these competencies. Finally, they consider the implications of undertaking generalist education evaluation.

AB - This paper provides and applies a conceptual framework and a list of guiding principles for evaluation of generalist education programs. Programs are systematic efforts to achieve specified objectives. Evaluations gather data in order to improve or appraise programs and have a continuum of purposes and methods. Descriptive evaluations characterize the structures, processes, and outcomes of programs; research evaluations definitively assess the effectiveness of a program in terms of outcomes. Intermediate outcomes are changes in knowledge, attitudes, and skills of program participants; conclusive outcomes reflect the quality of performance of graduates in actual clinical situations. Outcomes are affected by inputs-the qualities of students entering the program. Guiding principles of program evaluation ensure that data gathered are useful. The authors illustrate the guiding principles with an actual pilot study that determined that expert pediatricians, general internists, and family practitioners could agree on key generalist competencies and that explores evaluation design based on these competencies. Finally, they consider the implications of undertaking generalist education evaluation.

KW - generalist

KW - generalist competencies

KW - program evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028202125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028202125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02598120

DO - 10.1007/BF02598120

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 1 Supplement

ER -