Evaluation of a dual-screen, dual-emulsion mammography system

Valerie Jackson, C. D. Harrill, S. J. White, K. R. Gillespie, J. T. Mail, Barry Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared a new dual-screen, dual-emulsion film system for X-ray mammography with a widely used single-screen, single-emulsion combination for routine contact mammography in 100 patients with a variety of mammographic findings. By using a 5-point rating scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent), 4 blinded readers found the conventional combination superior in density (by 0.46 points on the rating scale), resolution (by 0.64 points), contrast (by 0.46 points), visibility of calcification (by 0.50 points), visibility of soft-tissue masses (by 0.37 points), and overall quality (by 0.47 points). No difference was seen in the graininess of the films. In our study, the conventional system was consistently found to be slightly better than the dual-screen, dual-emulsion combination. The dual-emulsion mammograms required more careful scrutiny, particularly for detection of faint microcalcifications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)483-486
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume152
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Mammography
Emulsions
Calcinosis
X-Ray Film

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Jackson, V., Harrill, C. D., White, S. J., Gillespie, K. R., Mail, J. T., & Katz, B. (1989). Evaluation of a dual-screen, dual-emulsion mammography system. American Journal of Roentgenology, 152(3), 483-486.

Evaluation of a dual-screen, dual-emulsion mammography system. / Jackson, Valerie; Harrill, C. D.; White, S. J.; Gillespie, K. R.; Mail, J. T.; Katz, Barry.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 152, No. 3, 1989, p. 483-486.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jackson, V, Harrill, CD, White, SJ, Gillespie, KR, Mail, JT & Katz, B 1989, 'Evaluation of a dual-screen, dual-emulsion mammography system', American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 483-486.
Jackson, Valerie ; Harrill, C. D. ; White, S. J. ; Gillespie, K. R. ; Mail, J. T. ; Katz, Barry. / Evaluation of a dual-screen, dual-emulsion mammography system. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1989 ; Vol. 152, No. 3. pp. 483-486.
@article{0aa84b2075cd4ffba25e0ab9ec5f6a31,
title = "Evaluation of a dual-screen, dual-emulsion mammography system",
abstract = "We compared a new dual-screen, dual-emulsion film system for X-ray mammography with a widely used single-screen, single-emulsion combination for routine contact mammography in 100 patients with a variety of mammographic findings. By using a 5-point rating scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent), 4 blinded readers found the conventional combination superior in density (by 0.46 points on the rating scale), resolution (by 0.64 points), contrast (by 0.46 points), visibility of calcification (by 0.50 points), visibility of soft-tissue masses (by 0.37 points), and overall quality (by 0.47 points). No difference was seen in the graininess of the films. In our study, the conventional system was consistently found to be slightly better than the dual-screen, dual-emulsion combination. The dual-emulsion mammograms required more careful scrutiny, particularly for detection of faint microcalcifications.",
author = "Valerie Jackson and Harrill, {C. D.} and White, {S. J.} and Gillespie, {K. R.} and Mail, {J. T.} and Barry Katz",
year = "1989",
language = "English",
volume = "152",
pages = "483--486",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a dual-screen, dual-emulsion mammography system

AU - Jackson, Valerie

AU - Harrill, C. D.

AU - White, S. J.

AU - Gillespie, K. R.

AU - Mail, J. T.

AU - Katz, Barry

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - We compared a new dual-screen, dual-emulsion film system for X-ray mammography with a widely used single-screen, single-emulsion combination for routine contact mammography in 100 patients with a variety of mammographic findings. By using a 5-point rating scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent), 4 blinded readers found the conventional combination superior in density (by 0.46 points on the rating scale), resolution (by 0.64 points), contrast (by 0.46 points), visibility of calcification (by 0.50 points), visibility of soft-tissue masses (by 0.37 points), and overall quality (by 0.47 points). No difference was seen in the graininess of the films. In our study, the conventional system was consistently found to be slightly better than the dual-screen, dual-emulsion combination. The dual-emulsion mammograms required more careful scrutiny, particularly for detection of faint microcalcifications.

AB - We compared a new dual-screen, dual-emulsion film system for X-ray mammography with a widely used single-screen, single-emulsion combination for routine contact mammography in 100 patients with a variety of mammographic findings. By using a 5-point rating scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent), 4 blinded readers found the conventional combination superior in density (by 0.46 points on the rating scale), resolution (by 0.64 points), contrast (by 0.46 points), visibility of calcification (by 0.50 points), visibility of soft-tissue masses (by 0.37 points), and overall quality (by 0.47 points). No difference was seen in the graininess of the films. In our study, the conventional system was consistently found to be slightly better than the dual-screen, dual-emulsion combination. The dual-emulsion mammograms required more careful scrutiny, particularly for detection of faint microcalcifications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024562592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024562592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 152

SP - 483

EP - 486

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 3

ER -