Evaluation of a reliable and cost-effective method of DNA isolation for mouse genotyping

Justin R. Sysol, Carrie Kempf, Michelle N. Helton, Yangbasai Dong, Daocheng Zhu, Haiying Sun, Joe G.N. Garcia, Roberto Machado, Jiwang Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Genotyping is commonly used to define specific gene alterations or the presence of transgenes in mice. This procedure is typically done using DNA isolated from mouse tail tissue. Although there are commercially available kits for tail DNA isolation, they can be time consuming and costly for routine genotyping. In this study, we describe a rapid, "crude" DNA isolation method using mouse tail tissue and compare it to a frequently used, commercially available kit in the genotyping of over 1,000 total mice from 8 genetic lines. Our genotyping results were obtained faster and less expensively but with the same success rate (Crude method: 97. 7 %, Kit method: 98. 4 %). To our knowledge, this is the first systematic study to compare the reliability of this crude DNA isolation method for mouse genotyping compared to a commercially available kit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)509-514
Number of pages6
JournalBiotechnology Letters
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

DNA
Costs and Cost Analysis
Tail
Costs
Tissue
Transgenes
Genes

Keywords

  • Genomic DNA isolation
  • Knockout mice
  • Mouse genotyping
  • PCR
  • Tail biopsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology

Cite this

Sysol, J. R., Kempf, C., Helton, M. N., Dong, Y., Zhu, D., Sun, H., ... Chen, J. (2013). Evaluation of a reliable and cost-effective method of DNA isolation for mouse genotyping. Biotechnology Letters, 35(4), 509-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-012-1113-2

Evaluation of a reliable and cost-effective method of DNA isolation for mouse genotyping. / Sysol, Justin R.; Kempf, Carrie; Helton, Michelle N.; Dong, Yangbasai; Zhu, Daocheng; Sun, Haiying; Garcia, Joe G.N.; Machado, Roberto; Chen, Jiwang.

In: Biotechnology Letters, Vol. 35, No. 4, 01.01.2013, p. 509-514.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sysol, JR, Kempf, C, Helton, MN, Dong, Y, Zhu, D, Sun, H, Garcia, JGN, Machado, R & Chen, J 2013, 'Evaluation of a reliable and cost-effective method of DNA isolation for mouse genotyping', Biotechnology Letters, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 509-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-012-1113-2
Sysol, Justin R. ; Kempf, Carrie ; Helton, Michelle N. ; Dong, Yangbasai ; Zhu, Daocheng ; Sun, Haiying ; Garcia, Joe G.N. ; Machado, Roberto ; Chen, Jiwang. / Evaluation of a reliable and cost-effective method of DNA isolation for mouse genotyping. In: Biotechnology Letters. 2013 ; Vol. 35, No. 4. pp. 509-514.
@article{ce1230f9cc984239b9cf459b44dfcefa,
title = "Evaluation of a reliable and cost-effective method of DNA isolation for mouse genotyping",
abstract = "Genotyping is commonly used to define specific gene alterations or the presence of transgenes in mice. This procedure is typically done using DNA isolated from mouse tail tissue. Although there are commercially available kits for tail DNA isolation, they can be time consuming and costly for routine genotyping. In this study, we describe a rapid, {"}crude{"} DNA isolation method using mouse tail tissue and compare it to a frequently used, commercially available kit in the genotyping of over 1,000 total mice from 8 genetic lines. Our genotyping results were obtained faster and less expensively but with the same success rate (Crude method: 97. 7 {\%}, Kit method: 98. 4 {\%}). To our knowledge, this is the first systematic study to compare the reliability of this crude DNA isolation method for mouse genotyping compared to a commercially available kit.",
keywords = "Genomic DNA isolation, Knockout mice, Mouse genotyping, PCR, Tail biopsy",
author = "Sysol, {Justin R.} and Carrie Kempf and Helton, {Michelle N.} and Yangbasai Dong and Daocheng Zhu and Haiying Sun and Garcia, {Joe G.N.} and Roberto Machado and Jiwang Chen",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10529-012-1113-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "509--514",
journal = "Biotechnology Letters",
issn = "0141-5492",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a reliable and cost-effective method of DNA isolation for mouse genotyping

AU - Sysol, Justin R.

AU - Kempf, Carrie

AU - Helton, Michelle N.

AU - Dong, Yangbasai

AU - Zhu, Daocheng

AU - Sun, Haiying

AU - Garcia, Joe G.N.

AU - Machado, Roberto

AU - Chen, Jiwang

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Genotyping is commonly used to define specific gene alterations or the presence of transgenes in mice. This procedure is typically done using DNA isolated from mouse tail tissue. Although there are commercially available kits for tail DNA isolation, they can be time consuming and costly for routine genotyping. In this study, we describe a rapid, "crude" DNA isolation method using mouse tail tissue and compare it to a frequently used, commercially available kit in the genotyping of over 1,000 total mice from 8 genetic lines. Our genotyping results were obtained faster and less expensively but with the same success rate (Crude method: 97. 7 %, Kit method: 98. 4 %). To our knowledge, this is the first systematic study to compare the reliability of this crude DNA isolation method for mouse genotyping compared to a commercially available kit.

AB - Genotyping is commonly used to define specific gene alterations or the presence of transgenes in mice. This procedure is typically done using DNA isolated from mouse tail tissue. Although there are commercially available kits for tail DNA isolation, they can be time consuming and costly for routine genotyping. In this study, we describe a rapid, "crude" DNA isolation method using mouse tail tissue and compare it to a frequently used, commercially available kit in the genotyping of over 1,000 total mice from 8 genetic lines. Our genotyping results were obtained faster and less expensively but with the same success rate (Crude method: 97. 7 %, Kit method: 98. 4 %). To our knowledge, this is the first systematic study to compare the reliability of this crude DNA isolation method for mouse genotyping compared to a commercially available kit.

KW - Genomic DNA isolation

KW - Knockout mice

KW - Mouse genotyping

KW - PCR

KW - Tail biopsy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874813000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874813000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10529-012-1113-2

DO - 10.1007/s10529-012-1113-2

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 509

EP - 514

JO - Biotechnology Letters

JF - Biotechnology Letters

SN - 0141-5492

IS - 4

ER -