Evaluation of post-ERCP pancreatitis

Potential causes noted during controlled study of differing contrast media

G. K. Johnson, J. E. Geenen, J. F. Johanson, Stuart Sherman, W. J. Hogan, O. Cass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Possible sources of post-ERCP pancreatitis were evaluated during a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing different contrast media. Methods: A total of 1979 patients were randomized and subdivided into groups during the study. Patients were grouped for comparison depending on the type of procedure performed during ERCP. Diagnostic patients studied with pancreatograms (Group I) were compared with other groups, specifically, those not studied with pancreatograms (Group IV). All patients had subjective and objective estimates of the difficulty in cannulation of both ducts. The incidence of postprocedural pancreatitis was compared between and within each group. Results: In Group I there was a progressively higher incidence of pancreatitis with increased numbers of pancreatic duct injections. Patients with the highest (19.5%) frequency of pancreatitis received 10 or more injections into the pancreatic duct. Group I cases with difficult common bile duct cannulations had a higher frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis (9.5%), as compared with the entire group (5.6%). Conclusions: There was a higher incidence of pancreatitis associated with increased manipulation around the papillary orifice, especially with multiple pancreatic duct injections. There was also a slightly higher incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis in cases with difficult common bile duct cannulation. Endoscopists are encouraged to evaluate and develop safer cannulation techniques that minimize the number of injections into the pancreatic duct and enhance selective cannulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-222
Number of pages6
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Pancreatitis
Contrast Media
Catheterization
Pancreatic Ducts
Injections
Incidence
Common Bile Duct

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Evaluation of post-ERCP pancreatitis : Potential causes noted during controlled study of differing contrast media. / Johnson, G. K.; Geenen, J. E.; Johanson, J. F.; Sherman, Stuart; Hogan, W. J.; Cass, O.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 46, No. 3, 1997, p. 217-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnson, G. K. ; Geenen, J. E. ; Johanson, J. F. ; Sherman, Stuart ; Hogan, W. J. ; Cass, O. / Evaluation of post-ERCP pancreatitis : Potential causes noted during controlled study of differing contrast media. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1997 ; Vol. 46, No. 3. pp. 217-222.
@article{97bd964586dc4af1aabf6c0992c8c846,
title = "Evaluation of post-ERCP pancreatitis: Potential causes noted during controlled study of differing contrast media",
abstract = "Background: Possible sources of post-ERCP pancreatitis were evaluated during a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing different contrast media. Methods: A total of 1979 patients were randomized and subdivided into groups during the study. Patients were grouped for comparison depending on the type of procedure performed during ERCP. Diagnostic patients studied with pancreatograms (Group I) were compared with other groups, specifically, those not studied with pancreatograms (Group IV). All patients had subjective and objective estimates of the difficulty in cannulation of both ducts. The incidence of postprocedural pancreatitis was compared between and within each group. Results: In Group I there was a progressively higher incidence of pancreatitis with increased numbers of pancreatic duct injections. Patients with the highest (19.5{\%}) frequency of pancreatitis received 10 or more injections into the pancreatic duct. Group I cases with difficult common bile duct cannulations had a higher frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis (9.5{\%}), as compared with the entire group (5.6{\%}). Conclusions: There was a higher incidence of pancreatitis associated with increased manipulation around the papillary orifice, especially with multiple pancreatic duct injections. There was also a slightly higher incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis in cases with difficult common bile duct cannulation. Endoscopists are encouraged to evaluate and develop safer cannulation techniques that minimize the number of injections into the pancreatic duct and enhance selective cannulation.",
author = "Johnson, {G. K.} and Geenen, {J. E.} and Johanson, {J. F.} and Stuart Sherman and Hogan, {W. J.} and O. Cass",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1016/S0016-5107(97)70089-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "217--222",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of post-ERCP pancreatitis

T2 - Potential causes noted during controlled study of differing contrast media

AU - Johnson, G. K.

AU - Geenen, J. E.

AU - Johanson, J. F.

AU - Sherman, Stuart

AU - Hogan, W. J.

AU - Cass, O.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Background: Possible sources of post-ERCP pancreatitis were evaluated during a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing different contrast media. Methods: A total of 1979 patients were randomized and subdivided into groups during the study. Patients were grouped for comparison depending on the type of procedure performed during ERCP. Diagnostic patients studied with pancreatograms (Group I) were compared with other groups, specifically, those not studied with pancreatograms (Group IV). All patients had subjective and objective estimates of the difficulty in cannulation of both ducts. The incidence of postprocedural pancreatitis was compared between and within each group. Results: In Group I there was a progressively higher incidence of pancreatitis with increased numbers of pancreatic duct injections. Patients with the highest (19.5%) frequency of pancreatitis received 10 or more injections into the pancreatic duct. Group I cases with difficult common bile duct cannulations had a higher frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis (9.5%), as compared with the entire group (5.6%). Conclusions: There was a higher incidence of pancreatitis associated with increased manipulation around the papillary orifice, especially with multiple pancreatic duct injections. There was also a slightly higher incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis in cases with difficult common bile duct cannulation. Endoscopists are encouraged to evaluate and develop safer cannulation techniques that minimize the number of injections into the pancreatic duct and enhance selective cannulation.

AB - Background: Possible sources of post-ERCP pancreatitis were evaluated during a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing different contrast media. Methods: A total of 1979 patients were randomized and subdivided into groups during the study. Patients were grouped for comparison depending on the type of procedure performed during ERCP. Diagnostic patients studied with pancreatograms (Group I) were compared with other groups, specifically, those not studied with pancreatograms (Group IV). All patients had subjective and objective estimates of the difficulty in cannulation of both ducts. The incidence of postprocedural pancreatitis was compared between and within each group. Results: In Group I there was a progressively higher incidence of pancreatitis with increased numbers of pancreatic duct injections. Patients with the highest (19.5%) frequency of pancreatitis received 10 or more injections into the pancreatic duct. Group I cases with difficult common bile duct cannulations had a higher frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis (9.5%), as compared with the entire group (5.6%). Conclusions: There was a higher incidence of pancreatitis associated with increased manipulation around the papillary orifice, especially with multiple pancreatic duct injections. There was also a slightly higher incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis in cases with difficult common bile duct cannulation. Endoscopists are encouraged to evaluate and develop safer cannulation techniques that minimize the number of injections into the pancreatic duct and enhance selective cannulation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030865256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030865256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0016-5107(97)70089-0

DO - 10.1016/S0016-5107(97)70089-0

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 217

EP - 222

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 3

ER -