Evaluation of potential distractors in the urology operating room

Jason Y. Lee, Andrea G. Lantz, Elspeth M. Mcdougall, Jaime Landman, Matthew Gettman, Robert Sweet, Chandru P. Sundaram, Kevin C. Zorn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Surgical outcomes depend on patient and disease-related factors, as well as the technical skill of the surgeon. Various distractions in the operating room (OR) environment have been shown to negatively impact a surgeon's performance. A survey was conducted with the objective to evaluate and characterize distractions during urologic surgery. Methods: An Internet-based survey was distributed to 2057 international urologists via email between April and October 2011; questions focused on a variety of disruptive factors postulated to have a negative impact on surgical performance. Results: Of the 523 (25%) respondents, 58% practiced in North America, 42% were from an academic institution, and 68% had completed a clinical fellowship. In an average year, 83% reported having operated at least once while sleep deprived, 84% when significantly ill, 55% with a musculoskeletal injury, and 65% under significant social stress. Up to 38% reported that on at least one occasion, such "internal distractions" had significantly affected surgical performance and 14% perceived that at least one surgical complication was caused mainly by an internal distraction. Less than 50% had ever cancelled surgery because of an internal distraction. Music was routinely played in the OR by 57% of respondents, >67% reported answering pages and discussing consults while operating, and 25% reported "commonly" working with scrub nurses/techs that were unfamiliar with the procedure and/or instruments. Only 44% had consistent individual(s) assisting, and 27% reported that the scrub nurse/tech would "commonly" scrub out during a critical portion of the procedure. Overall, 14.5% reported that at least one complication had occurred mainly because of such "external" or "interactive" distractions. Conclusions: Urologists face various distractions in the OR that can negatively impact surgical performance, potentially compromising patient outcomes and safety. Further studies are needed to elucidate the true impact of such distractions and to develop strategies to mitigate their effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1161-1165
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume27
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of potential distractors in the urology operating room'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Lee, J. Y., Lantz, A. G., Mcdougall, E. M., Landman, J., Gettman, M., Sweet, R., Sundaram, C. P., & Zorn, K. C. (2013). Evaluation of potential distractors in the urology operating room. Journal of Endourology, 27(9), 1161-1165. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0704