Evaluation of the learning curve for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: Bilateral ovariectomy in dogs

Lynetta J. Freeman, Emad Y. Rahmani, Richard C.F. Burgess, Mohammad Al-Haddad, Don J. Selzer, Stuart Sherman, Peter Constable

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Study the learning curve for canine Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) ovariectomy by evaluating operative times and complications. Study Design: Preclinical research study. Animals: Adult female dogs (n=20). Methods: NOTES ovariectomy procedures were performed as follows: Feasibility Group 1 (n=5), Feasibility Group 2 (n=5), and Early Clinical Group 3 (n=10). Six steps of the procedure were identified, timed separately, and the overall time was recorded from introduction to removal of the endoscope. Complications were recorded. Repeated measures analysis of variance using ranked data compared the effect of group (3 levels) on the time for each step. Nonlinear regression using an exponential model with nonzero asymptote was used to model the operative time-procedure number relationship. Results: Overall median operative time was significantly longer for Group 1 (195 minutes; range, 160-265 minutes) than Group 2 (108 minutes; range, 81-148 minutes; P=.048) and Group 3 (77 minutes; range, 41-136 minutes; P=.0008). The estimated asymptotic operative time was 71 minutes (95% confidence interval, 41-100 minutes); this time was reached after 10 procedures. Gastric cleansing and removing the left ovary took significantly longer in Group 1 than in Group 2 or 3. Operative complications included incomplete ovarian excision, dropping an ovary during retrieval, and conversion to an open procedure. No intraoperative complications occurred in Group 3. Conclusion: NOTES procedures result in longer operative times in the early part of the learning curve and require considerable experience before reaching proficiency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)140-150
Number of pages11
JournalVeterinary Surgery
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2011

Fingerprint

Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery
Learning Curve
ovariectomy
Ovariectomy
Operative Time
learning
surgery
Dogs
dogs
endoscopes
group effect
Ovary
confidence interval
stomach
Conversion to Open Surgery
analysis of variance
experimental design
Endoscopes
Intraoperative Complications
Operative Surgical Procedures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Evaluation of the learning curve for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery : Bilateral ovariectomy in dogs. / Freeman, Lynetta J.; Rahmani, Emad Y.; Burgess, Richard C.F.; Al-Haddad, Mohammad; Selzer, Don J.; Sherman, Stuart; Constable, Peter.

In: Veterinary Surgery, Vol. 40, No. 2, 01.02.2011, p. 140-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Freeman, Lynetta J. ; Rahmani, Emad Y. ; Burgess, Richard C.F. ; Al-Haddad, Mohammad ; Selzer, Don J. ; Sherman, Stuart ; Constable, Peter. / Evaluation of the learning curve for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery : Bilateral ovariectomy in dogs. In: Veterinary Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 40, No. 2. pp. 140-150.
@article{51aa4cd7fbb349719d98291614e5d5f9,
title = "Evaluation of the learning curve for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: Bilateral ovariectomy in dogs",
abstract = "Objective: Study the learning curve for canine Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) ovariectomy by evaluating operative times and complications. Study Design: Preclinical research study. Animals: Adult female dogs (n=20). Methods: NOTES ovariectomy procedures were performed as follows: Feasibility Group 1 (n=5), Feasibility Group 2 (n=5), and Early Clinical Group 3 (n=10). Six steps of the procedure were identified, timed separately, and the overall time was recorded from introduction to removal of the endoscope. Complications were recorded. Repeated measures analysis of variance using ranked data compared the effect of group (3 levels) on the time for each step. Nonlinear regression using an exponential model with nonzero asymptote was used to model the operative time-procedure number relationship. Results: Overall median operative time was significantly longer for Group 1 (195 minutes; range, 160-265 minutes) than Group 2 (108 minutes; range, 81-148 minutes; P=.048) and Group 3 (77 minutes; range, 41-136 minutes; P=.0008). The estimated asymptotic operative time was 71 minutes (95{\%} confidence interval, 41-100 minutes); this time was reached after 10 procedures. Gastric cleansing and removing the left ovary took significantly longer in Group 1 than in Group 2 or 3. Operative complications included incomplete ovarian excision, dropping an ovary during retrieval, and conversion to an open procedure. No intraoperative complications occurred in Group 3. Conclusion: NOTES procedures result in longer operative times in the early part of the learning curve and require considerable experience before reaching proficiency.",
author = "Freeman, {Lynetta J.} and Rahmani, {Emad Y.} and Burgess, {Richard C.F.} and Mohammad Al-Haddad and Selzer, {Don J.} and Stuart Sherman and Peter Constable",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00779.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "140--150",
journal = "Veterinary Surgery",
issn = "0161-3499",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the learning curve for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery

T2 - Bilateral ovariectomy in dogs

AU - Freeman, Lynetta J.

AU - Rahmani, Emad Y.

AU - Burgess, Richard C.F.

AU - Al-Haddad, Mohammad

AU - Selzer, Don J.

AU - Sherman, Stuart

AU - Constable, Peter

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - Objective: Study the learning curve for canine Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) ovariectomy by evaluating operative times and complications. Study Design: Preclinical research study. Animals: Adult female dogs (n=20). Methods: NOTES ovariectomy procedures were performed as follows: Feasibility Group 1 (n=5), Feasibility Group 2 (n=5), and Early Clinical Group 3 (n=10). Six steps of the procedure were identified, timed separately, and the overall time was recorded from introduction to removal of the endoscope. Complications were recorded. Repeated measures analysis of variance using ranked data compared the effect of group (3 levels) on the time for each step. Nonlinear regression using an exponential model with nonzero asymptote was used to model the operative time-procedure number relationship. Results: Overall median operative time was significantly longer for Group 1 (195 minutes; range, 160-265 minutes) than Group 2 (108 minutes; range, 81-148 minutes; P=.048) and Group 3 (77 minutes; range, 41-136 minutes; P=.0008). The estimated asymptotic operative time was 71 minutes (95% confidence interval, 41-100 minutes); this time was reached after 10 procedures. Gastric cleansing and removing the left ovary took significantly longer in Group 1 than in Group 2 or 3. Operative complications included incomplete ovarian excision, dropping an ovary during retrieval, and conversion to an open procedure. No intraoperative complications occurred in Group 3. Conclusion: NOTES procedures result in longer operative times in the early part of the learning curve and require considerable experience before reaching proficiency.

AB - Objective: Study the learning curve for canine Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) ovariectomy by evaluating operative times and complications. Study Design: Preclinical research study. Animals: Adult female dogs (n=20). Methods: NOTES ovariectomy procedures were performed as follows: Feasibility Group 1 (n=5), Feasibility Group 2 (n=5), and Early Clinical Group 3 (n=10). Six steps of the procedure were identified, timed separately, and the overall time was recorded from introduction to removal of the endoscope. Complications were recorded. Repeated measures analysis of variance using ranked data compared the effect of group (3 levels) on the time for each step. Nonlinear regression using an exponential model with nonzero asymptote was used to model the operative time-procedure number relationship. Results: Overall median operative time was significantly longer for Group 1 (195 minutes; range, 160-265 minutes) than Group 2 (108 minutes; range, 81-148 minutes; P=.048) and Group 3 (77 minutes; range, 41-136 minutes; P=.0008). The estimated asymptotic operative time was 71 minutes (95% confidence interval, 41-100 minutes); this time was reached after 10 procedures. Gastric cleansing and removing the left ovary took significantly longer in Group 1 than in Group 2 or 3. Operative complications included incomplete ovarian excision, dropping an ovary during retrieval, and conversion to an open procedure. No intraoperative complications occurred in Group 3. Conclusion: NOTES procedures result in longer operative times in the early part of the learning curve and require considerable experience before reaching proficiency.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951799768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951799768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00779.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00779.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21223315

AN - SCOPUS:79951799768

VL - 40

SP - 140

EP - 150

JO - Veterinary Surgery

JF - Veterinary Surgery

SN - 0161-3499

IS - 2

ER -