Evaluation of two-dimensional lateral cephalogram and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography superimpositions: a comparative study

J. Heinz, Kelton Stewart, A. Ghoneima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Superimposition of radiographic imaging is used to evaluate patient growth and the effects of surgical and/or orthodontic treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of superimposition between two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) superimpositions. 2D lateral cephalograms were generated from the initial and final cone beam computed tomography scans (CBCT) of 18 patients and superimposed. Both 3D CBCT and 2D CBCT generated lateral cephalograms were oriented to the Frankfort horizontal plane and superimposed according to the American Board of Orthodontics recommendations. Changes in landmark position were quantified from the resulting superimposition outcomes via linear measurements made with Dolphin software. Differences between the two methods were analyzed using paired t-tests. Measurements were repeated twice for 10 randomly selected scans to assess reliability by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. Intra-examiner reliability was high for all measurements (ICC > 0.84). Agreement between 2D and 3D superimposition outcomes, as measured by P-values, was low for ANS (P = 0.026), B-point (P < 0.001), ST Upper lip (P = 0.019), U1 tip (P = 0.010), and U1 apex (P = 0.026). 2D measurements were significantly higher than 3D measurements for ANS, B-point, ST Upper lip, U1 tip, and U1 apex. Findings indicated that both methods of superimposition (2D and 3D) are highly reliable. Statistical differences between 2D and 3D superimposition outcomes were below the threshold of clinical significance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)519-525
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Lip
Orthodontics
Dolphins
Software
Growth
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • clinical significance
  • cone beam computed tomography
  • reliability
  • superimposition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oral Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

@article{8c297b0b2bf246cfbdba51dc8a2976c5,
title = "Evaluation of two-dimensional lateral cephalogram and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography superimpositions: a comparative study",
abstract = "Superimposition of radiographic imaging is used to evaluate patient growth and the effects of surgical and/or orthodontic treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of superimposition between two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) superimpositions. 2D lateral cephalograms were generated from the initial and final cone beam computed tomography scans (CBCT) of 18 patients and superimposed. Both 3D CBCT and 2D CBCT generated lateral cephalograms were oriented to the Frankfort horizontal plane and superimposed according to the American Board of Orthodontics recommendations. Changes in landmark position were quantified from the resulting superimposition outcomes via linear measurements made with Dolphin software. Differences between the two methods were analyzed using paired t-tests. Measurements were repeated twice for 10 randomly selected scans to assess reliability by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. Intra-examiner reliability was high for all measurements (ICC > 0.84). Agreement between 2D and 3D superimposition outcomes, as measured by P-values, was low for ANS (P = 0.026), B-point (P < 0.001), ST Upper lip (P = 0.019), U1 tip (P = 0.010), and U1 apex (P = 0.026). 2D measurements were significantly higher than 3D measurements for ANS, B-point, ST Upper lip, U1 tip, and U1 apex. Findings indicated that both methods of superimposition (2D and 3D) are highly reliable. Statistical differences between 2D and 3D superimposition outcomes were below the threshold of clinical significance.",
keywords = "clinical significance, cone beam computed tomography, reliability, superimposition",
author = "J. Heinz and Kelton Stewart and A. Ghoneima",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijom.2018.10.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "519--525",
journal = "International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery",
issn = "0901-5027",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of two-dimensional lateral cephalogram and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography superimpositions

T2 - a comparative study

AU - Heinz, J.

AU - Stewart, Kelton

AU - Ghoneima, A.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Superimposition of radiographic imaging is used to evaluate patient growth and the effects of surgical and/or orthodontic treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of superimposition between two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) superimpositions. 2D lateral cephalograms were generated from the initial and final cone beam computed tomography scans (CBCT) of 18 patients and superimposed. Both 3D CBCT and 2D CBCT generated lateral cephalograms were oriented to the Frankfort horizontal plane and superimposed according to the American Board of Orthodontics recommendations. Changes in landmark position were quantified from the resulting superimposition outcomes via linear measurements made with Dolphin software. Differences between the two methods were analyzed using paired t-tests. Measurements were repeated twice for 10 randomly selected scans to assess reliability by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. Intra-examiner reliability was high for all measurements (ICC > 0.84). Agreement between 2D and 3D superimposition outcomes, as measured by P-values, was low for ANS (P = 0.026), B-point (P < 0.001), ST Upper lip (P = 0.019), U1 tip (P = 0.010), and U1 apex (P = 0.026). 2D measurements were significantly higher than 3D measurements for ANS, B-point, ST Upper lip, U1 tip, and U1 apex. Findings indicated that both methods of superimposition (2D and 3D) are highly reliable. Statistical differences between 2D and 3D superimposition outcomes were below the threshold of clinical significance.

AB - Superimposition of radiographic imaging is used to evaluate patient growth and the effects of surgical and/or orthodontic treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of superimposition between two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) superimpositions. 2D lateral cephalograms were generated from the initial and final cone beam computed tomography scans (CBCT) of 18 patients and superimposed. Both 3D CBCT and 2D CBCT generated lateral cephalograms were oriented to the Frankfort horizontal plane and superimposed according to the American Board of Orthodontics recommendations. Changes in landmark position were quantified from the resulting superimposition outcomes via linear measurements made with Dolphin software. Differences between the two methods were analyzed using paired t-tests. Measurements were repeated twice for 10 randomly selected scans to assess reliability by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. Intra-examiner reliability was high for all measurements (ICC > 0.84). Agreement between 2D and 3D superimposition outcomes, as measured by P-values, was low for ANS (P = 0.026), B-point (P < 0.001), ST Upper lip (P = 0.019), U1 tip (P = 0.010), and U1 apex (P = 0.026). 2D measurements were significantly higher than 3D measurements for ANS, B-point, ST Upper lip, U1 tip, and U1 apex. Findings indicated that both methods of superimposition (2D and 3D) are highly reliable. Statistical differences between 2D and 3D superimposition outcomes were below the threshold of clinical significance.

KW - clinical significance

KW - cone beam computed tomography

KW - reliability

KW - superimposition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054841290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054841290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.10.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 30342757

AN - SCOPUS:85054841290

VL - 48

SP - 519

EP - 525

JO - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

JF - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

SN - 0901-5027

IS - 4

ER -