Evaluation of web-based ostomy patient support resources

Joyce Pittman, Thom Nichols, Susan Rawl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate currently available, no-cost, Web-based patient support resources designed for those who have recently undergone ostomy surgery. DESIGN: Descriptive, correlational study using telephone survey. SAMPLE AND SETTING: The sample comprised 202 adults who had ostomy surgery within the previous 24 months in 1 of 5 hospitals within a large healthcare organization in the Midwestern United States. Two of the hospitals were academic teaching hospitals, and 3 were community hospitals. METHODS: The study was divided into 2 phases: (1) gap analysis of 4 Web sites (labeled A-D) based on specific criteria; and (2) telephone survey of individuals with an ostomy. In phase 1, a comprehensive checklist based on best practice standards was developed to conduct the gap analysis. In phase 2, data were collected from 202 participants by trained interviewers via 1-time structured telephone interviews that required approximately 30 minutes to complete. Descriptive analyses were performed, along with correlational analysis of relationships among Web site usage, acceptability and satisfaction, demographic characteristics, and medical history. RESULTS: Gap analysis revealed that Web site D, managed by a patient advocacy group, received the highest total content score of 155/176 (88%) and the highest usability score of 31.7/35 (91%). Two hundred two participants completed the telephone interview, with 96 (48%) reporting that they used the Internet as a source of information. Sixty participants (30%) reported that friends or family member had searched the Internet for ostomy information on their behalf, and 148 (75%) indicated they were confident they could get information about ostomies on the Internet. Of the 90 participants (45%) who reported using the Internet to locate ostomy information, 73 (82%) found the information on the Web easy to understand, 28 (31%) reported being frustrated during their search for information, 24 (27%) indicated it took a lot of effort to get the information they needed, and 39 (43%) were concerned about the quality of the information. CONCLUSION: Web-based patient support resources may be a cost-effective approach to providing essential ostomy information, self-management training, and support. Additional research is needed to examine the efficacy of Web-based patient support interventions to improve ostomy self-management knowledge, skills, and outcomes for patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)550-556
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing
Volume44
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Ostomy
Internet
Interviews
Self Care
Telephone
Midwestern United States
Patient Advocacy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Training Support
Information Management
Community Hospital
G1 Phase
Checklist
Practice Guidelines
Teaching Hospitals
Demography
Organizations
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Gap analysis
  • Internet
  • Ostomy
  • Ostomy best practice standards
  • Ostomy education
  • Patient resources
  • Patient support interventions
  • Stoma
  • Web site
  • Web-based

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medical–Surgical
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

Evaluation of web-based ostomy patient support resources. / Pittman, Joyce; Nichols, Thom; Rawl, Susan.

In: Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, Vol. 44, No. 6, 01.01.2017, p. 550-556.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{113babe6244e4b9d83b67d165aac023e,
title = "Evaluation of web-based ostomy patient support resources",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate currently available, no-cost, Web-based patient support resources designed for those who have recently undergone ostomy surgery. DESIGN: Descriptive, correlational study using telephone survey. SAMPLE AND SETTING: The sample comprised 202 adults who had ostomy surgery within the previous 24 months in 1 of 5 hospitals within a large healthcare organization in the Midwestern United States. Two of the hospitals were academic teaching hospitals, and 3 were community hospitals. METHODS: The study was divided into 2 phases: (1) gap analysis of 4 Web sites (labeled A-D) based on specific criteria; and (2) telephone survey of individuals with an ostomy. In phase 1, a comprehensive checklist based on best practice standards was developed to conduct the gap analysis. In phase 2, data were collected from 202 participants by trained interviewers via 1-time structured telephone interviews that required approximately 30 minutes to complete. Descriptive analyses were performed, along with correlational analysis of relationships among Web site usage, acceptability and satisfaction, demographic characteristics, and medical history. RESULTS: Gap analysis revealed that Web site D, managed by a patient advocacy group, received the highest total content score of 155/176 (88{\%}) and the highest usability score of 31.7/35 (91{\%}). Two hundred two participants completed the telephone interview, with 96 (48{\%}) reporting that they used the Internet as a source of information. Sixty participants (30{\%}) reported that friends or family member had searched the Internet for ostomy information on their behalf, and 148 (75{\%}) indicated they were confident they could get information about ostomies on the Internet. Of the 90 participants (45{\%}) who reported using the Internet to locate ostomy information, 73 (82{\%}) found the information on the Web easy to understand, 28 (31{\%}) reported being frustrated during their search for information, 24 (27{\%}) indicated it took a lot of effort to get the information they needed, and 39 (43{\%}) were concerned about the quality of the information. CONCLUSION: Web-based patient support resources may be a cost-effective approach to providing essential ostomy information, self-management training, and support. Additional research is needed to examine the efficacy of Web-based patient support interventions to improve ostomy self-management knowledge, skills, and outcomes for patients.",
keywords = "Gap analysis, Internet, Ostomy, Ostomy best practice standards, Ostomy education, Patient resources, Patient support interventions, Stoma, Web site, Web-based",
author = "Joyce Pittman and Thom Nichols and Susan Rawl",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/WON.0000000000000371",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "550--556",
journal = "Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing",
issn = "1071-5754",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of web-based ostomy patient support resources

AU - Pittman, Joyce

AU - Nichols, Thom

AU - Rawl, Susan

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate currently available, no-cost, Web-based patient support resources designed for those who have recently undergone ostomy surgery. DESIGN: Descriptive, correlational study using telephone survey. SAMPLE AND SETTING: The sample comprised 202 adults who had ostomy surgery within the previous 24 months in 1 of 5 hospitals within a large healthcare organization in the Midwestern United States. Two of the hospitals were academic teaching hospitals, and 3 were community hospitals. METHODS: The study was divided into 2 phases: (1) gap analysis of 4 Web sites (labeled A-D) based on specific criteria; and (2) telephone survey of individuals with an ostomy. In phase 1, a comprehensive checklist based on best practice standards was developed to conduct the gap analysis. In phase 2, data were collected from 202 participants by trained interviewers via 1-time structured telephone interviews that required approximately 30 minutes to complete. Descriptive analyses were performed, along with correlational analysis of relationships among Web site usage, acceptability and satisfaction, demographic characteristics, and medical history. RESULTS: Gap analysis revealed that Web site D, managed by a patient advocacy group, received the highest total content score of 155/176 (88%) and the highest usability score of 31.7/35 (91%). Two hundred two participants completed the telephone interview, with 96 (48%) reporting that they used the Internet as a source of information. Sixty participants (30%) reported that friends or family member had searched the Internet for ostomy information on their behalf, and 148 (75%) indicated they were confident they could get information about ostomies on the Internet. Of the 90 participants (45%) who reported using the Internet to locate ostomy information, 73 (82%) found the information on the Web easy to understand, 28 (31%) reported being frustrated during their search for information, 24 (27%) indicated it took a lot of effort to get the information they needed, and 39 (43%) were concerned about the quality of the information. CONCLUSION: Web-based patient support resources may be a cost-effective approach to providing essential ostomy information, self-management training, and support. Additional research is needed to examine the efficacy of Web-based patient support interventions to improve ostomy self-management knowledge, skills, and outcomes for patients.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate currently available, no-cost, Web-based patient support resources designed for those who have recently undergone ostomy surgery. DESIGN: Descriptive, correlational study using telephone survey. SAMPLE AND SETTING: The sample comprised 202 adults who had ostomy surgery within the previous 24 months in 1 of 5 hospitals within a large healthcare organization in the Midwestern United States. Two of the hospitals were academic teaching hospitals, and 3 were community hospitals. METHODS: The study was divided into 2 phases: (1) gap analysis of 4 Web sites (labeled A-D) based on specific criteria; and (2) telephone survey of individuals with an ostomy. In phase 1, a comprehensive checklist based on best practice standards was developed to conduct the gap analysis. In phase 2, data were collected from 202 participants by trained interviewers via 1-time structured telephone interviews that required approximately 30 minutes to complete. Descriptive analyses were performed, along with correlational analysis of relationships among Web site usage, acceptability and satisfaction, demographic characteristics, and medical history. RESULTS: Gap analysis revealed that Web site D, managed by a patient advocacy group, received the highest total content score of 155/176 (88%) and the highest usability score of 31.7/35 (91%). Two hundred two participants completed the telephone interview, with 96 (48%) reporting that they used the Internet as a source of information. Sixty participants (30%) reported that friends or family member had searched the Internet for ostomy information on their behalf, and 148 (75%) indicated they were confident they could get information about ostomies on the Internet. Of the 90 participants (45%) who reported using the Internet to locate ostomy information, 73 (82%) found the information on the Web easy to understand, 28 (31%) reported being frustrated during their search for information, 24 (27%) indicated it took a lot of effort to get the information they needed, and 39 (43%) were concerned about the quality of the information. CONCLUSION: Web-based patient support resources may be a cost-effective approach to providing essential ostomy information, self-management training, and support. Additional research is needed to examine the efficacy of Web-based patient support interventions to improve ostomy self-management knowledge, skills, and outcomes for patients.

KW - Gap analysis

KW - Internet

KW - Ostomy

KW - Ostomy best practice standards

KW - Ostomy education

KW - Patient resources

KW - Patient support interventions

KW - Stoma

KW - Web site

KW - Web-based

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033801137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033801137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/WON.0000000000000371

DO - 10.1097/WON.0000000000000371

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 550

EP - 556

JO - Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

JF - Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

SN - 1071-5754

IS - 6

ER -