Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002

Keith D. Cicerone, Cynthia Dahlberg, James F. Malec, Donna M. Langenbahn, Thomas Felicetti, Sally Kneipp, Wendy Ellmo, Kathleen Kalmar, Joseph T. Giacino, J. Preston Harley, Linda Laatsch, Philip A. Morse, Jeanne Catanese

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

786 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To update the previous evidence-based recommendations of the Brain Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine for cognitive rehabilitation of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke, based on a systematic review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Data Sources: PubMed and Infotrieve literature searches were conducted using the terms attention, awareness, cognition, communication, executive, language, memory, perception, problem solving, and reasoning combined with each of the terms rehabilitation, remediation, and training. Reference lists from identified articles were reviewed and a bibliography listing 312 articles was compiled. Study Selection: One hundred eighteen articles were initially selected for inclusion. Thirty-one studies were excluded after detailed review. Excluded articles included 14 studies without data, 6 duplicate publications or follow-up studies, 5 nontreatment studies, 4 reviews, and 2 case studies involving diagnoses other than TBI or stroke. Data Extraction: Articles were assigned to 1 of 7 categories reflecting the primary area of intervention: attention; visual perception; apraxia; language and communication; memory; executive functioning, problem solving and awareness; and comprehensive-holistic cognitive rehabilitation. Articles were abstracted and levels of evidence determined using specific criteria. Data Synthesis: Of the 87 studies evaluated, 17 were rated as class I, 8 as class II, and 62 as class III. Evidence within each area of intervention was synthesized and recommendations for practice standards, practice guidelines, and practice options were made. Conclusions: There is substantial evidence to support cognitive-linguistic therapies for people with language deficits after left hemisphere stroke. New evidence supports training for apraxia after left hemisphere stroke. The evidence supports visuospatial rehabilitation for deficits associated with visual neglect after right hemisphere stroke. There is substantial evidence to support cognitive rehabilitation for people with TBI, including strategy training for mild memory impairment, strategy training for postacute attention deficits, and interventions for functional communication deficits. The overall analysis of 47 treatment comparisons, based on class I studies included in the current and previous review, reveals a differential benefit in favor of cognitive rehabilitation in 37 of 47 (78.7%) comparisons, with no comparison demonstrating a benefit in favor of the alternative treatment condition. Future research should move beyond the simple question of whether cognitive rehabilitation is effective, and examine the therapy factors and patient characteristics that optimize the clinical outcomes of cognitive rehabilitation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1681-1692
Number of pages12
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume86
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rehabilitation
Stroke
Apraxias
Language
Communication
Duplicate Publication
Training Support
Public Opinion
Visual Perception
Information Storage and Retrieval
Bibliography
Cognitive Therapy
Linguistics
Practice Guidelines
PubMed
Brain Injuries
Cognition
Therapeutics
Medicine
Learning

Keywords

  • Brain injuries
  • Cognition disorders
  • Practice guidelines
  • Rehabilitation
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Malec, J. F., Langenbahn, D. M., Felicetti, T., Kneipp, S., ... Catanese, J. (2005). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(8), 1681-1692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.024

Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation : Updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. / Cicerone, Keith D.; Dahlberg, Cynthia; Malec, James F.; Langenbahn, Donna M.; Felicetti, Thomas; Kneipp, Sally; Ellmo, Wendy; Kalmar, Kathleen; Giacino, Joseph T.; Harley, J. Preston; Laatsch, Linda; Morse, Philip A.; Catanese, Jeanne.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 86, No. 8, 08.2005, p. 1681-1692.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cicerone, KD, Dahlberg, C, Malec, JF, Langenbahn, DM, Felicetti, T, Kneipp, S, Ellmo, W, Kalmar, K, Giacino, JT, Harley, JP, Laatsch, L, Morse, PA & Catanese, J 2005, 'Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002', Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 86, no. 8, pp. 1681-1692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.024
Cicerone, Keith D. ; Dahlberg, Cynthia ; Malec, James F. ; Langenbahn, Donna M. ; Felicetti, Thomas ; Kneipp, Sally ; Ellmo, Wendy ; Kalmar, Kathleen ; Giacino, Joseph T. ; Harley, J. Preston ; Laatsch, Linda ; Morse, Philip A. ; Catanese, Jeanne. / Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation : Updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2005 ; Vol. 86, No. 8. pp. 1681-1692.
@article{58763df2959447fba34a6b8c41dd8889,
title = "Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002",
abstract = "Objective: To update the previous evidence-based recommendations of the Brain Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine for cognitive rehabilitation of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke, based on a systematic review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Data Sources: PubMed and Infotrieve literature searches were conducted using the terms attention, awareness, cognition, communication, executive, language, memory, perception, problem solving, and reasoning combined with each of the terms rehabilitation, remediation, and training. Reference lists from identified articles were reviewed and a bibliography listing 312 articles was compiled. Study Selection: One hundred eighteen articles were initially selected for inclusion. Thirty-one studies were excluded after detailed review. Excluded articles included 14 studies without data, 6 duplicate publications or follow-up studies, 5 nontreatment studies, 4 reviews, and 2 case studies involving diagnoses other than TBI or stroke. Data Extraction: Articles were assigned to 1 of 7 categories reflecting the primary area of intervention: attention; visual perception; apraxia; language and communication; memory; executive functioning, problem solving and awareness; and comprehensive-holistic cognitive rehabilitation. Articles were abstracted and levels of evidence determined using specific criteria. Data Synthesis: Of the 87 studies evaluated, 17 were rated as class I, 8 as class II, and 62 as class III. Evidence within each area of intervention was synthesized and recommendations for practice standards, practice guidelines, and practice options were made. Conclusions: There is substantial evidence to support cognitive-linguistic therapies for people with language deficits after left hemisphere stroke. New evidence supports training for apraxia after left hemisphere stroke. The evidence supports visuospatial rehabilitation for deficits associated with visual neglect after right hemisphere stroke. There is substantial evidence to support cognitive rehabilitation for people with TBI, including strategy training for mild memory impairment, strategy training for postacute attention deficits, and interventions for functional communication deficits. The overall analysis of 47 treatment comparisons, based on class I studies included in the current and previous review, reveals a differential benefit in favor of cognitive rehabilitation in 37 of 47 (78.7{\%}) comparisons, with no comparison demonstrating a benefit in favor of the alternative treatment condition. Future research should move beyond the simple question of whether cognitive rehabilitation is effective, and examine the therapy factors and patient characteristics that optimize the clinical outcomes of cognitive rehabilitation.",
keywords = "Brain injuries, Cognition disorders, Practice guidelines, Rehabilitation, Stroke",
author = "Cicerone, {Keith D.} and Cynthia Dahlberg and Malec, {James F.} and Langenbahn, {Donna M.} and Thomas Felicetti and Sally Kneipp and Wendy Ellmo and Kathleen Kalmar and Giacino, {Joseph T.} and Harley, {J. Preston} and Linda Laatsch and Morse, {Philip A.} and Jeanne Catanese",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "1681--1692",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation

T2 - Updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002

AU - Cicerone, Keith D.

AU - Dahlberg, Cynthia

AU - Malec, James F.

AU - Langenbahn, Donna M.

AU - Felicetti, Thomas

AU - Kneipp, Sally

AU - Ellmo, Wendy

AU - Kalmar, Kathleen

AU - Giacino, Joseph T.

AU - Harley, J. Preston

AU - Laatsch, Linda

AU - Morse, Philip A.

AU - Catanese, Jeanne

PY - 2005/8

Y1 - 2005/8

N2 - Objective: To update the previous evidence-based recommendations of the Brain Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine for cognitive rehabilitation of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke, based on a systematic review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Data Sources: PubMed and Infotrieve literature searches were conducted using the terms attention, awareness, cognition, communication, executive, language, memory, perception, problem solving, and reasoning combined with each of the terms rehabilitation, remediation, and training. Reference lists from identified articles were reviewed and a bibliography listing 312 articles was compiled. Study Selection: One hundred eighteen articles were initially selected for inclusion. Thirty-one studies were excluded after detailed review. Excluded articles included 14 studies without data, 6 duplicate publications or follow-up studies, 5 nontreatment studies, 4 reviews, and 2 case studies involving diagnoses other than TBI or stroke. Data Extraction: Articles were assigned to 1 of 7 categories reflecting the primary area of intervention: attention; visual perception; apraxia; language and communication; memory; executive functioning, problem solving and awareness; and comprehensive-holistic cognitive rehabilitation. Articles were abstracted and levels of evidence determined using specific criteria. Data Synthesis: Of the 87 studies evaluated, 17 were rated as class I, 8 as class II, and 62 as class III. Evidence within each area of intervention was synthesized and recommendations for practice standards, practice guidelines, and practice options were made. Conclusions: There is substantial evidence to support cognitive-linguistic therapies for people with language deficits after left hemisphere stroke. New evidence supports training for apraxia after left hemisphere stroke. The evidence supports visuospatial rehabilitation for deficits associated with visual neglect after right hemisphere stroke. There is substantial evidence to support cognitive rehabilitation for people with TBI, including strategy training for mild memory impairment, strategy training for postacute attention deficits, and interventions for functional communication deficits. The overall analysis of 47 treatment comparisons, based on class I studies included in the current and previous review, reveals a differential benefit in favor of cognitive rehabilitation in 37 of 47 (78.7%) comparisons, with no comparison demonstrating a benefit in favor of the alternative treatment condition. Future research should move beyond the simple question of whether cognitive rehabilitation is effective, and examine the therapy factors and patient characteristics that optimize the clinical outcomes of cognitive rehabilitation.

AB - Objective: To update the previous evidence-based recommendations of the Brain Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine for cognitive rehabilitation of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke, based on a systematic review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Data Sources: PubMed and Infotrieve literature searches were conducted using the terms attention, awareness, cognition, communication, executive, language, memory, perception, problem solving, and reasoning combined with each of the terms rehabilitation, remediation, and training. Reference lists from identified articles were reviewed and a bibliography listing 312 articles was compiled. Study Selection: One hundred eighteen articles were initially selected for inclusion. Thirty-one studies were excluded after detailed review. Excluded articles included 14 studies without data, 6 duplicate publications or follow-up studies, 5 nontreatment studies, 4 reviews, and 2 case studies involving diagnoses other than TBI or stroke. Data Extraction: Articles were assigned to 1 of 7 categories reflecting the primary area of intervention: attention; visual perception; apraxia; language and communication; memory; executive functioning, problem solving and awareness; and comprehensive-holistic cognitive rehabilitation. Articles were abstracted and levels of evidence determined using specific criteria. Data Synthesis: Of the 87 studies evaluated, 17 were rated as class I, 8 as class II, and 62 as class III. Evidence within each area of intervention was synthesized and recommendations for practice standards, practice guidelines, and practice options were made. Conclusions: There is substantial evidence to support cognitive-linguistic therapies for people with language deficits after left hemisphere stroke. New evidence supports training for apraxia after left hemisphere stroke. The evidence supports visuospatial rehabilitation for deficits associated with visual neglect after right hemisphere stroke. There is substantial evidence to support cognitive rehabilitation for people with TBI, including strategy training for mild memory impairment, strategy training for postacute attention deficits, and interventions for functional communication deficits. The overall analysis of 47 treatment comparisons, based on class I studies included in the current and previous review, reveals a differential benefit in favor of cognitive rehabilitation in 37 of 47 (78.7%) comparisons, with no comparison demonstrating a benefit in favor of the alternative treatment condition. Future research should move beyond the simple question of whether cognitive rehabilitation is effective, and examine the therapy factors and patient characteristics that optimize the clinical outcomes of cognitive rehabilitation.

KW - Brain injuries

KW - Cognition disorders

KW - Practice guidelines

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23644439245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23644439245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.024

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.024

M3 - Article

C2 - 16084827

AN - SCOPUS:23644439245

VL - 86

SP - 1681

EP - 1692

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 8

ER -