Examination of Accuracy in the Assessment of Gastric Residual Volume: A Simulated, Controlled Study

Rebecca Ellis, Joseph Fuehne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Increased gastric content from enteral nutrition intolerance is thought to place patients at risk for pulmonary aspiration. Although considered a questionable practice, blind gastric tube aspiration is the most common approach to measure gastric content. This simulated study evaluated the accuracy of residual volume (RV) assessment via tube aspirations made from known volumes by controlling the syringe pull technique, feeding tube properties, fluid viscosity, and placement of tubes in the fluid. Materials and Methods. This study was conducted in a metrology laboratory. Aspirates were obtained using a force measurement test system to control force of the syringe pull technique using 3 different procedures (slow 10 inches per minute [ipm], intermittent 10 ipm, and fast 40 ipm). Four different feeding tubes, 10 Fr and 18 Fr, each made of polyurethane and polyvinyl chloride, were placed in varying depths of 100 mL of either water or formula. The effect of fluid viscosity was also examined. Results. Overall, 108 RVs were analyzed using a force measurement test system. Actual content of RV was underestimated 19% on average and varied across tube size and viscosity. Intermittent and slow syringe pull techniques yielded greater aspirate quantities, although neither technique aspirated the full amount of volume available. The 10 Fr feeding tubes yielded larger RVs in more viscous fluid, yet the 18 Fr tubes performed better with fluids of lower viscosity. Conclusions. Based on this simulation, RV assessment does not accurately reflect the total volume of the contents available and, therefore, the clinical utility of this assessment should be further investigated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)434-440
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2015

Fingerprint

Residual Volume
Enteral Nutrition
Viscosity
Stomach
Syringes
Gastrointestinal Contents
Polyurethanes
Polyvinyl Chloride
Lung
Water

Keywords

  • dimensional measurement accuracy
  • enteral nutrition
  • gastric feeding tubes
  • nutrition support

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Examination of Accuracy in the Assessment of Gastric Residual Volume : A Simulated, Controlled Study. / Ellis, Rebecca; Fuehne, Joseph.

In: Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Vol. 39, No. 4, 04.05.2015, p. 434-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0d9b0dc7fb514765a3f7576e48e759aa,
title = "Examination of Accuracy in the Assessment of Gastric Residual Volume: A Simulated, Controlled Study",
abstract = "Background. Increased gastric content from enteral nutrition intolerance is thought to place patients at risk for pulmonary aspiration. Although considered a questionable practice, blind gastric tube aspiration is the most common approach to measure gastric content. This simulated study evaluated the accuracy of residual volume (RV) assessment via tube aspirations made from known volumes by controlling the syringe pull technique, feeding tube properties, fluid viscosity, and placement of tubes in the fluid. Materials and Methods. This study was conducted in a metrology laboratory. Aspirates were obtained using a force measurement test system to control force of the syringe pull technique using 3 different procedures (slow 10 inches per minute [ipm], intermittent 10 ipm, and fast 40 ipm). Four different feeding tubes, 10 Fr and 18 Fr, each made of polyurethane and polyvinyl chloride, were placed in varying depths of 100 mL of either water or formula. The effect of fluid viscosity was also examined. Results. Overall, 108 RVs were analyzed using a force measurement test system. Actual content of RV was underestimated 19{\%} on average and varied across tube size and viscosity. Intermittent and slow syringe pull techniques yielded greater aspirate quantities, although neither technique aspirated the full amount of volume available. The 10 Fr feeding tubes yielded larger RVs in more viscous fluid, yet the 18 Fr tubes performed better with fluids of lower viscosity. Conclusions. Based on this simulation, RV assessment does not accurately reflect the total volume of the contents available and, therefore, the clinical utility of this assessment should be further investigated.",
keywords = "dimensional measurement accuracy, enteral nutrition, gastric feeding tubes, nutrition support",
author = "Rebecca Ellis and Joseph Fuehne",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0148607114524230",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "434--440",
journal = "Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition",
issn = "0148-6071",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examination of Accuracy in the Assessment of Gastric Residual Volume

T2 - A Simulated, Controlled Study

AU - Ellis, Rebecca

AU - Fuehne, Joseph

PY - 2015/5/4

Y1 - 2015/5/4

N2 - Background. Increased gastric content from enteral nutrition intolerance is thought to place patients at risk for pulmonary aspiration. Although considered a questionable practice, blind gastric tube aspiration is the most common approach to measure gastric content. This simulated study evaluated the accuracy of residual volume (RV) assessment via tube aspirations made from known volumes by controlling the syringe pull technique, feeding tube properties, fluid viscosity, and placement of tubes in the fluid. Materials and Methods. This study was conducted in a metrology laboratory. Aspirates were obtained using a force measurement test system to control force of the syringe pull technique using 3 different procedures (slow 10 inches per minute [ipm], intermittent 10 ipm, and fast 40 ipm). Four different feeding tubes, 10 Fr and 18 Fr, each made of polyurethane and polyvinyl chloride, were placed in varying depths of 100 mL of either water or formula. The effect of fluid viscosity was also examined. Results. Overall, 108 RVs were analyzed using a force measurement test system. Actual content of RV was underestimated 19% on average and varied across tube size and viscosity. Intermittent and slow syringe pull techniques yielded greater aspirate quantities, although neither technique aspirated the full amount of volume available. The 10 Fr feeding tubes yielded larger RVs in more viscous fluid, yet the 18 Fr tubes performed better with fluids of lower viscosity. Conclusions. Based on this simulation, RV assessment does not accurately reflect the total volume of the contents available and, therefore, the clinical utility of this assessment should be further investigated.

AB - Background. Increased gastric content from enteral nutrition intolerance is thought to place patients at risk for pulmonary aspiration. Although considered a questionable practice, blind gastric tube aspiration is the most common approach to measure gastric content. This simulated study evaluated the accuracy of residual volume (RV) assessment via tube aspirations made from known volumes by controlling the syringe pull technique, feeding tube properties, fluid viscosity, and placement of tubes in the fluid. Materials and Methods. This study was conducted in a metrology laboratory. Aspirates were obtained using a force measurement test system to control force of the syringe pull technique using 3 different procedures (slow 10 inches per minute [ipm], intermittent 10 ipm, and fast 40 ipm). Four different feeding tubes, 10 Fr and 18 Fr, each made of polyurethane and polyvinyl chloride, were placed in varying depths of 100 mL of either water or formula. The effect of fluid viscosity was also examined. Results. Overall, 108 RVs were analyzed using a force measurement test system. Actual content of RV was underestimated 19% on average and varied across tube size and viscosity. Intermittent and slow syringe pull techniques yielded greater aspirate quantities, although neither technique aspirated the full amount of volume available. The 10 Fr feeding tubes yielded larger RVs in more viscous fluid, yet the 18 Fr tubes performed better with fluids of lower viscosity. Conclusions. Based on this simulation, RV assessment does not accurately reflect the total volume of the contents available and, therefore, the clinical utility of this assessment should be further investigated.

KW - dimensional measurement accuracy

KW - enteral nutrition

KW - gastric feeding tubes

KW - nutrition support

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930520122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930520122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0148607114524230

DO - 10.1177/0148607114524230

M3 - Article

C2 - 24562002

AN - SCOPUS:84930520122

VL - 39

SP - 434

EP - 440

JO - Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

JF - Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

SN - 0148-6071

IS - 4

ER -