Examination of assumptions for loval cerebral blood flow studies in PET

R. A. Koeppe, Gary Hutchins, J. M. Rothley, R. D. Hichwa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two common assumptions made in most positron emission tomography (PET) cerebral blood flow techniques have been examined in detail. These are (1) that the blood-borne radioactivity component in the measured PET data in negligible, and (2) that differences in arrival time of the arterial bolus across the brain cause insignificant biases in the estimated cerebral blood flow (CBF) values. Biases in CBF values due to partial failure of these assumptions have been predicted by computer simulation studies and also quantitated for both dynamic and single scan PET methods using H215O. Both computer simulations and measured PET data indicate that these assumptions can sometimes cause significant errors in the estimated flow values. The magnitude of these errors depends on the PET technique used (dynamic or static) and on the interval of data included in the flow calculations. The bias caused when these assumptions fail can be considerably reduced by omitting ~40 sec of data immediately following tracer administration from the CBF calculations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1695-1703
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Nuclear Medicine
Volume28
Issue number11
StatePublished - 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cerebrovascular Circulation
Positron-Emission Tomography
Computer Simulation
Radioactivity
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Koeppe, R. A., Hutchins, G., Rothley, J. M., & Hichwa, R. D. (1987). Examination of assumptions for loval cerebral blood flow studies in PET. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 28(11), 1695-1703.

Examination of assumptions for loval cerebral blood flow studies in PET. / Koeppe, R. A.; Hutchins, Gary; Rothley, J. M.; Hichwa, R. D.

In: Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 11, 1987, p. 1695-1703.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Koeppe, RA, Hutchins, G, Rothley, JM & Hichwa, RD 1987, 'Examination of assumptions for loval cerebral blood flow studies in PET', Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1695-1703.
Koeppe, R. A. ; Hutchins, Gary ; Rothley, J. M. ; Hichwa, R. D. / Examination of assumptions for loval cerebral blood flow studies in PET. In: Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 1987 ; Vol. 28, No. 11. pp. 1695-1703.
@article{e4087dceba014968bd1a9949aaf330cc,
title = "Examination of assumptions for loval cerebral blood flow studies in PET",
abstract = "Two common assumptions made in most positron emission tomography (PET) cerebral blood flow techniques have been examined in detail. These are (1) that the blood-borne radioactivity component in the measured PET data in negligible, and (2) that differences in arrival time of the arterial bolus across the brain cause insignificant biases in the estimated cerebral blood flow (CBF) values. Biases in CBF values due to partial failure of these assumptions have been predicted by computer simulation studies and also quantitated for both dynamic and single scan PET methods using H215O. Both computer simulations and measured PET data indicate that these assumptions can sometimes cause significant errors in the estimated flow values. The magnitude of these errors depends on the PET technique used (dynamic or static) and on the interval of data included in the flow calculations. The bias caused when these assumptions fail can be considerably reduced by omitting ~40 sec of data immediately following tracer administration from the CBF calculations.",
author = "Koeppe, {R. A.} and Gary Hutchins and Rothley, {J. M.} and Hichwa, {R. D.}",
year = "1987",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "1695--1703",
journal = "Journal of Nuclear Medicine",
issn = "0161-5505",
publisher = "Society of Nuclear Medicine Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examination of assumptions for loval cerebral blood flow studies in PET

AU - Koeppe, R. A.

AU - Hutchins, Gary

AU - Rothley, J. M.

AU - Hichwa, R. D.

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - Two common assumptions made in most positron emission tomography (PET) cerebral blood flow techniques have been examined in detail. These are (1) that the blood-borne radioactivity component in the measured PET data in negligible, and (2) that differences in arrival time of the arterial bolus across the brain cause insignificant biases in the estimated cerebral blood flow (CBF) values. Biases in CBF values due to partial failure of these assumptions have been predicted by computer simulation studies and also quantitated for both dynamic and single scan PET methods using H215O. Both computer simulations and measured PET data indicate that these assumptions can sometimes cause significant errors in the estimated flow values. The magnitude of these errors depends on the PET technique used (dynamic or static) and on the interval of data included in the flow calculations. The bias caused when these assumptions fail can be considerably reduced by omitting ~40 sec of data immediately following tracer administration from the CBF calculations.

AB - Two common assumptions made in most positron emission tomography (PET) cerebral blood flow techniques have been examined in detail. These are (1) that the blood-borne radioactivity component in the measured PET data in negligible, and (2) that differences in arrival time of the arterial bolus across the brain cause insignificant biases in the estimated cerebral blood flow (CBF) values. Biases in CBF values due to partial failure of these assumptions have been predicted by computer simulation studies and also quantitated for both dynamic and single scan PET methods using H215O. Both computer simulations and measured PET data indicate that these assumptions can sometimes cause significant errors in the estimated flow values. The magnitude of these errors depends on the PET technique used (dynamic or static) and on the interval of data included in the flow calculations. The bias caused when these assumptions fail can be considerably reduced by omitting ~40 sec of data immediately following tracer administration from the CBF calculations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023525931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023525931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3499491

AN - SCOPUS:0023525931

VL - 28

SP - 1695

EP - 1703

JO - Journal of Nuclear Medicine

JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine

SN - 0161-5505

IS - 11

ER -