Examining the boundaries of tailoring

The utility of tailoring versus targeting mammography interventions for two distinct populations

G. L. Ryan, C. S. Skinner, D. Farrell, Victoria Champion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Health messages can be generic, targeted to population subsets or tailored for individual recipients. There has been little examination of which populations need tailored interventions or whether tailored and targeted interventions differ in important ways. We used data from a mammography intervention study in two distinct populations to simulate a comparison of individually tailored versus targeted interventions. Tailored intervention content was based on individual recipients' interview responses. Targeted intervention content was based on composite group responses. For more than 60% in each population group, about two-thirds of tailored message content was a good match with content of the targeted intervention generated by composite group responses; roughly one-third of the content was 'not a good' fit for their intervention needs. Tailored interventions for more than 80% of subjects in each population differed in at least some way from those generated for all other population group members. This simulation is a first step in quantifying the contribution of individual tailoring over group targeting. Future research should examine whether a targeted intervention that is mostly a 'good' match results in behavioral outcomes similar to those of individually tailored interventions and whether particular differences in tailored versus targeted interventions yield significantly more favorable intervention outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)555-566
Number of pages12
JournalHealth Education Research
Volume16
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Mammography
Population Groups
Population
Interviews
population group
Health
recipient
match
Group
group membership

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Education

Cite this

Examining the boundaries of tailoring : The utility of tailoring versus targeting mammography interventions for two distinct populations. / Ryan, G. L.; Skinner, C. S.; Farrell, D.; Champion, Victoria.

In: Health Education Research, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2001, p. 555-566.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{acefb60cd404456dbb8552a96fb1031e,
title = "Examining the boundaries of tailoring: The utility of tailoring versus targeting mammography interventions for two distinct populations",
abstract = "Health messages can be generic, targeted to population subsets or tailored for individual recipients. There has been little examination of which populations need tailored interventions or whether tailored and targeted interventions differ in important ways. We used data from a mammography intervention study in two distinct populations to simulate a comparison of individually tailored versus targeted interventions. Tailored intervention content was based on individual recipients' interview responses. Targeted intervention content was based on composite group responses. For more than 60{\%} in each population group, about two-thirds of tailored message content was a good match with content of the targeted intervention generated by composite group responses; roughly one-third of the content was 'not a good' fit for their intervention needs. Tailored interventions for more than 80{\%} of subjects in each population differed in at least some way from those generated for all other population group members. This simulation is a first step in quantifying the contribution of individual tailoring over group targeting. Future research should examine whether a targeted intervention that is mostly a 'good' match results in behavioral outcomes similar to those of individually tailored interventions and whether particular differences in tailored versus targeted interventions yield significantly more favorable intervention outcomes.",
author = "Ryan, {G. L.} and Skinner, {C. S.} and D. Farrell and Victoria Champion",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "555--566",
journal = "Health Education Research",
issn = "0268-1153",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the boundaries of tailoring

T2 - The utility of tailoring versus targeting mammography interventions for two distinct populations

AU - Ryan, G. L.

AU - Skinner, C. S.

AU - Farrell, D.

AU - Champion, Victoria

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Health messages can be generic, targeted to population subsets or tailored for individual recipients. There has been little examination of which populations need tailored interventions or whether tailored and targeted interventions differ in important ways. We used data from a mammography intervention study in two distinct populations to simulate a comparison of individually tailored versus targeted interventions. Tailored intervention content was based on individual recipients' interview responses. Targeted intervention content was based on composite group responses. For more than 60% in each population group, about two-thirds of tailored message content was a good match with content of the targeted intervention generated by composite group responses; roughly one-third of the content was 'not a good' fit for their intervention needs. Tailored interventions for more than 80% of subjects in each population differed in at least some way from those generated for all other population group members. This simulation is a first step in quantifying the contribution of individual tailoring over group targeting. Future research should examine whether a targeted intervention that is mostly a 'good' match results in behavioral outcomes similar to those of individually tailored interventions and whether particular differences in tailored versus targeted interventions yield significantly more favorable intervention outcomes.

AB - Health messages can be generic, targeted to population subsets or tailored for individual recipients. There has been little examination of which populations need tailored interventions or whether tailored and targeted interventions differ in important ways. We used data from a mammography intervention study in two distinct populations to simulate a comparison of individually tailored versus targeted interventions. Tailored intervention content was based on individual recipients' interview responses. Targeted intervention content was based on composite group responses. For more than 60% in each population group, about two-thirds of tailored message content was a good match with content of the targeted intervention generated by composite group responses; roughly one-third of the content was 'not a good' fit for their intervention needs. Tailored interventions for more than 80% of subjects in each population differed in at least some way from those generated for all other population group members. This simulation is a first step in quantifying the contribution of individual tailoring over group targeting. Future research should examine whether a targeted intervention that is mostly a 'good' match results in behavioral outcomes similar to those of individually tailored interventions and whether particular differences in tailored versus targeted interventions yield significantly more favorable intervention outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034798652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034798652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 555

EP - 566

JO - Health Education Research

JF - Health Education Research

SN - 0268-1153

IS - 5

ER -