Exercise echocardiography: Detection of coronary artery disease in patients with normal left ventricular wall motion at rest

Thomas Ryan, Charles G. Vasey, Charles F. Presti, Jacqueline O'Donnell, Harvey Feigenbaum, William F. Armstrong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

171 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most studies investigating the ability of exercise two-dimensional echocardiography to identify patients with coronary artery disease have included patients with left ventricular wall motion abnormalities at rest. This has the effect of increasing sensitivity because patients with only abnormalities at rest are detected. To determine the diagnostic utility of exercise echocardiography in patients with normal wall motion at rest, 64 patients were studied with exercise echocardiography in conjunction with routine treadmill exercise testing before coronary cineangiography. All 24 patients who had no angiographie evidence of coronary artery disease had a negative exercise echocardiogram (100% specificity). Nine of 40 patients with coronary artery disease (defined a >- 50% narrowing of at least one major vessel) also had a negative exercise echocardiogram (78% sensitivity). Of the nine patients with a false negative exercise echocardiographic study, six had single vessel disease. Among 25 patients with single vessel disease, exercise echocardiography was significantly more sensitive (p = 0.01) than treadmill exercise testing alone (76 versus 36%, respectively). Among 15 patients with multivessel disease, the two tests demonstrated similar sensitivity (80%). In conclusion, exercise echocardiography is highly specific and moderately sensitive for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with normal wall motion at rest. Although exercise echocardiography is significantly more sensitive than treadmill exercise electrocardiographic testing alone in patients with single vessel disease, the two tests are similar in their ability to detect coronary artery discase in patients with multivessel disease and normal wall motion at rest.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)993-999
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1988

Fingerprint

Echocardiography
Coronary Artery Disease
Exercise
Chymopapain
Cineangiography
Coronary Vessels

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Exercise echocardiography : Detection of coronary artery disease in patients with normal left ventricular wall motion at rest. / Ryan, Thomas; Vasey, Charles G.; Presti, Charles F.; O'Donnell, Jacqueline; Feigenbaum, Harvey; Armstrong, William F.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 11, No. 5, 1988, p. 993-999.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{15c2b02342f142449056ca228ec4a74d,
title = "Exercise echocardiography: Detection of coronary artery disease in patients with normal left ventricular wall motion at rest",
abstract = "Most studies investigating the ability of exercise two-dimensional echocardiography to identify patients with coronary artery disease have included patients with left ventricular wall motion abnormalities at rest. This has the effect of increasing sensitivity because patients with only abnormalities at rest are detected. To determine the diagnostic utility of exercise echocardiography in patients with normal wall motion at rest, 64 patients were studied with exercise echocardiography in conjunction with routine treadmill exercise testing before coronary cineangiography. All 24 patients who had no angiographie evidence of coronary artery disease had a negative exercise echocardiogram (100{\%} specificity). Nine of 40 patients with coronary artery disease (defined a >- 50{\%} narrowing of at least one major vessel) also had a negative exercise echocardiogram (78{\%} sensitivity). Of the nine patients with a false negative exercise echocardiographic study, six had single vessel disease. Among 25 patients with single vessel disease, exercise echocardiography was significantly more sensitive (p = 0.01) than treadmill exercise testing alone (76 versus 36{\%}, respectively). Among 15 patients with multivessel disease, the two tests demonstrated similar sensitivity (80{\%}). In conclusion, exercise echocardiography is highly specific and moderately sensitive for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with normal wall motion at rest. Although exercise echocardiography is significantly more sensitive than treadmill exercise electrocardiographic testing alone in patients with single vessel disease, the two tests are similar in their ability to detect coronary artery discase in patients with multivessel disease and normal wall motion at rest.",
author = "Thomas Ryan and Vasey, {Charles G.} and Presti, {Charles F.} and Jacqueline O'Donnell and Harvey Feigenbaum and Armstrong, {William F.}",
year = "1988",
doi = "10.1016/S0735-1097(98)90056-0",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "993--999",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exercise echocardiography

T2 - Detection of coronary artery disease in patients with normal left ventricular wall motion at rest

AU - Ryan, Thomas

AU - Vasey, Charles G.

AU - Presti, Charles F.

AU - O'Donnell, Jacqueline

AU - Feigenbaum, Harvey

AU - Armstrong, William F.

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - Most studies investigating the ability of exercise two-dimensional echocardiography to identify patients with coronary artery disease have included patients with left ventricular wall motion abnormalities at rest. This has the effect of increasing sensitivity because patients with only abnormalities at rest are detected. To determine the diagnostic utility of exercise echocardiography in patients with normal wall motion at rest, 64 patients were studied with exercise echocardiography in conjunction with routine treadmill exercise testing before coronary cineangiography. All 24 patients who had no angiographie evidence of coronary artery disease had a negative exercise echocardiogram (100% specificity). Nine of 40 patients with coronary artery disease (defined a >- 50% narrowing of at least one major vessel) also had a negative exercise echocardiogram (78% sensitivity). Of the nine patients with a false negative exercise echocardiographic study, six had single vessel disease. Among 25 patients with single vessel disease, exercise echocardiography was significantly more sensitive (p = 0.01) than treadmill exercise testing alone (76 versus 36%, respectively). Among 15 patients with multivessel disease, the two tests demonstrated similar sensitivity (80%). In conclusion, exercise echocardiography is highly specific and moderately sensitive for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with normal wall motion at rest. Although exercise echocardiography is significantly more sensitive than treadmill exercise electrocardiographic testing alone in patients with single vessel disease, the two tests are similar in their ability to detect coronary artery discase in patients with multivessel disease and normal wall motion at rest.

AB - Most studies investigating the ability of exercise two-dimensional echocardiography to identify patients with coronary artery disease have included patients with left ventricular wall motion abnormalities at rest. This has the effect of increasing sensitivity because patients with only abnormalities at rest are detected. To determine the diagnostic utility of exercise echocardiography in patients with normal wall motion at rest, 64 patients were studied with exercise echocardiography in conjunction with routine treadmill exercise testing before coronary cineangiography. All 24 patients who had no angiographie evidence of coronary artery disease had a negative exercise echocardiogram (100% specificity). Nine of 40 patients with coronary artery disease (defined a >- 50% narrowing of at least one major vessel) also had a negative exercise echocardiogram (78% sensitivity). Of the nine patients with a false negative exercise echocardiographic study, six had single vessel disease. Among 25 patients with single vessel disease, exercise echocardiography was significantly more sensitive (p = 0.01) than treadmill exercise testing alone (76 versus 36%, respectively). Among 15 patients with multivessel disease, the two tests demonstrated similar sensitivity (80%). In conclusion, exercise echocardiography is highly specific and moderately sensitive for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with normal wall motion at rest. Although exercise echocardiography is significantly more sensitive than treadmill exercise electrocardiographic testing alone in patients with single vessel disease, the two tests are similar in their ability to detect coronary artery discase in patients with multivessel disease and normal wall motion at rest.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023912163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023912163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)90056-0

DO - 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)90056-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 3356843

AN - SCOPUS:0023912163

VL - 11

SP - 993

EP - 999

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 5

ER -