Experimental assessment of small intestinal submucosa as a bladder wall substitute

Bradley P. Kropp, Barry L. Eppley, C. D. Prevel, M. K. Rippy, R. C. Harruff, S. F. Badylak, M. C. Adams, R. C. Rink, M. A. Keating

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

270 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives. This study determined the feasibility of promoting urinary bladder regeneration with porcine-derived small intestinal submucosa (SIS). Methods. Twenty-two Sprague-Dawley rats underwent partial cystectomy with immediate bladder augmentation with SIS. Bladders were harvested for histologic evaluation at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Results. Histologically at 2 weeks, there was infiltration of the graft material with viable host cells consisting of fibroblasts, macrophages, and blood vessels covered by complete mucosal urothelium comprised of transitional cells. During the next 10 weeks, collagen formation and maturation were noted, and by the end of 12 weeks, the SIS graft was comprised of a mature collagen matrix admixed with thinly scattered disorganized smooth muscle bundles and covered by normal urothelium. At 48 weeks, all three layers of the normal bladder (urothelium, smooth muscle, and serosa) were present and were grossly and microscopically indistinguishable from the normal rat urinary bladder. Conclusions. This study further supports the concept of bladder regeneration and suggests that SIS may be a viable material for bladder augmentations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)396-400
Number of pages5
JournalUrology
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Experimental assessment of small intestinal submucosa as a bladder wall substitute'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Kropp, B. P., Eppley, B. L., Prevel, C. D., Rippy, M. K., Harruff, R. C., Badylak, S. F., Adams, M. C., Rink, R. C., & Keating, M. A. (1995). Experimental assessment of small intestinal submucosa as a bladder wall substitute. Urology, 46(3), 396-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80227-1