Exploring provider-surrogate communication during POLST discussions for individuals with advanced dementia

Hyejin Kim, Christine Bradway, Susan Hickman, Mary Ersek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: This qualitative descriptive study explored provider-surrogate communication during Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) discussions for patients with advanced dementia. Methods: Data from participant observations and audio-recordings of ten POLST discussions were analyzed using directed content analysis within the context of an existing conceptual model of Communication and Surrogate Decision Making. Results: Surrogates primarily focused on making sense of the clinical information about life-sustaining treatments during POLST conversations. Providers delivered clinical information about the trajectory of dementia, life-sustaining treatments, and/or features of POLST. They also demonstrated emotional support, by valuing what the surrogate said, acknowledging the surrogate's emotions, listening carefully, understanding the patient as a person, and eliciting questions. However, providers rarely conveyed comprehensive information about the patient's current condition and end-of-life treatment options. Also, open communication of expectations and preferred decision-making roles was rarely observed during the discussions. Conclusion: Findings highlight areas that require providers’ attention to conduct effective communication, such as delivering comprehensive information about life-sustaining treatments including discussion of risks and benefits in the context of dementia. Findings also support the use of the conceptual model as a framework to examine provider-surrogate communication in the context of POLST discussions, advanced dementia, and non-hospital settings. Additional research is necessary to confirm these findings in larger, more diverse groups of patients, surrogates, and providers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalAging and Mental Health
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Dementia
Communication
Physicians
Therapeutics
Decision Making
Emotions
Research

Keywords

  • dementia
  • end-of-life care planning
  • palliative care
  • physician orders for life-sustaining treatment
  • Surrogate decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Phychiatric Mental Health
  • Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Exploring provider-surrogate communication during POLST discussions for individuals with advanced dementia. / Kim, Hyejin; Bradway, Christine; Hickman, Susan; Ersek, Mary.

In: Aging and Mental Health, 01.04.2018, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ce06a456f7e34a088cccf8be2685b3e8,
title = "Exploring provider-surrogate communication during POLST discussions for individuals with advanced dementia",
abstract = "Objectives: This qualitative descriptive study explored provider-surrogate communication during Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) discussions for patients with advanced dementia. Methods: Data from participant observations and audio-recordings of ten POLST discussions were analyzed using directed content analysis within the context of an existing conceptual model of Communication and Surrogate Decision Making. Results: Surrogates primarily focused on making sense of the clinical information about life-sustaining treatments during POLST conversations. Providers delivered clinical information about the trajectory of dementia, life-sustaining treatments, and/or features of POLST. They also demonstrated emotional support, by valuing what the surrogate said, acknowledging the surrogate's emotions, listening carefully, understanding the patient as a person, and eliciting questions. However, providers rarely conveyed comprehensive information about the patient's current condition and end-of-life treatment options. Also, open communication of expectations and preferred decision-making roles was rarely observed during the discussions. Conclusion: Findings highlight areas that require providers’ attention to conduct effective communication, such as delivering comprehensive information about life-sustaining treatments including discussion of risks and benefits in the context of dementia. Findings also support the use of the conceptual model as a framework to examine provider-surrogate communication in the context of POLST discussions, advanced dementia, and non-hospital settings. Additional research is necessary to confirm these findings in larger, more diverse groups of patients, surrogates, and providers.",
keywords = "dementia, end-of-life care planning, palliative care, physician orders for life-sustaining treatment, Surrogate decision making",
author = "Hyejin Kim and Christine Bradway and Susan Hickman and Mary Ersek",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13607863.2018.1452899",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Aging and Mental Health",
issn = "1360-7863",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring provider-surrogate communication during POLST discussions for individuals with advanced dementia

AU - Kim, Hyejin

AU - Bradway, Christine

AU - Hickman, Susan

AU - Ersek, Mary

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Objectives: This qualitative descriptive study explored provider-surrogate communication during Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) discussions for patients with advanced dementia. Methods: Data from participant observations and audio-recordings of ten POLST discussions were analyzed using directed content analysis within the context of an existing conceptual model of Communication and Surrogate Decision Making. Results: Surrogates primarily focused on making sense of the clinical information about life-sustaining treatments during POLST conversations. Providers delivered clinical information about the trajectory of dementia, life-sustaining treatments, and/or features of POLST. They also demonstrated emotional support, by valuing what the surrogate said, acknowledging the surrogate's emotions, listening carefully, understanding the patient as a person, and eliciting questions. However, providers rarely conveyed comprehensive information about the patient's current condition and end-of-life treatment options. Also, open communication of expectations and preferred decision-making roles was rarely observed during the discussions. Conclusion: Findings highlight areas that require providers’ attention to conduct effective communication, such as delivering comprehensive information about life-sustaining treatments including discussion of risks and benefits in the context of dementia. Findings also support the use of the conceptual model as a framework to examine provider-surrogate communication in the context of POLST discussions, advanced dementia, and non-hospital settings. Additional research is necessary to confirm these findings in larger, more diverse groups of patients, surrogates, and providers.

AB - Objectives: This qualitative descriptive study explored provider-surrogate communication during Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) discussions for patients with advanced dementia. Methods: Data from participant observations and audio-recordings of ten POLST discussions were analyzed using directed content analysis within the context of an existing conceptual model of Communication and Surrogate Decision Making. Results: Surrogates primarily focused on making sense of the clinical information about life-sustaining treatments during POLST conversations. Providers delivered clinical information about the trajectory of dementia, life-sustaining treatments, and/or features of POLST. They also demonstrated emotional support, by valuing what the surrogate said, acknowledging the surrogate's emotions, listening carefully, understanding the patient as a person, and eliciting questions. However, providers rarely conveyed comprehensive information about the patient's current condition and end-of-life treatment options. Also, open communication of expectations and preferred decision-making roles was rarely observed during the discussions. Conclusion: Findings highlight areas that require providers’ attention to conduct effective communication, such as delivering comprehensive information about life-sustaining treatments including discussion of risks and benefits in the context of dementia. Findings also support the use of the conceptual model as a framework to examine provider-surrogate communication in the context of POLST discussions, advanced dementia, and non-hospital settings. Additional research is necessary to confirm these findings in larger, more diverse groups of patients, surrogates, and providers.

KW - dementia

KW - end-of-life care planning

KW - palliative care

KW - physician orders for life-sustaining treatment

KW - Surrogate decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044760901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044760901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13607863.2018.1452899

DO - 10.1080/13607863.2018.1452899

M3 - Article

C2 - 29608338

AN - SCOPUS:85044760901

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Aging and Mental Health

JF - Aging and Mental Health

SN - 1360-7863

ER -