Factors associated with healthcare costs in women with fibromyalgia

H. R. Walen, T. A. Cronan, Silvia Bigatti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine how women with high and low healthcare costs differ by using the Anderson Health Behavior Model of Utilization as a theoretical framework. Study design: One-year longitudinal design. Patients and methods: A total of 537 female health maintenance organization members with fibromyalgia participating in a study examining the effects of social support and education on health status and healthcare use were divided into 2 groups using a median split on health costs. Predisposing variables (demographic variables, self-efficacy, depression, and social support), enabling characteristics (income), and need variables (health status, perceived health status, disease severity, duration of symptoms, and comorbidity) were measured. Patients completed a battery of questionnaires at baseline assessment, and healthcare costs were assessed 1 year before and 1 year after baseline assessment. Healthcare data were collected from medical records. Healthcare costs were estimated by multiplying the number of each type of healthcare contact by the most recent national average cost figures. Results: Multivariate analysis of covariance controlling for costs during the year before baseline assessment was performed. Low-cost patients had fewer comorbid conditions, better health status, higher self-perceived health status, less disease severity, greater self-efficacy for functioning, lower depression scores, and higher social support scores. χ2 Analyses revealed no significant differences between groups on marital status but a significant difference in income low-cost patients were more likely to report higher incomes. Conclusions: There were several significant differences between people with higher and lower healthcare costs. Although effect sizes were small, many variables may be responsive to intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Managed Care
Volume7
Issue numberSPEC. ISS.
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fibromyalgia
Health Care Costs
Health Status
Social Support
Costs and Cost Analysis
costs
health status
Self Efficacy
Delivery of Health Care
social support
Depression
Health Maintenance Organizations
Health Behavior
Marital Status
self-efficacy
Medical Records
Comorbidity
Multivariate Analysis
Disease
Demography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Medicine(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Factors associated with healthcare costs in women with fibromyalgia. / Walen, H. R.; Cronan, T. A.; Bigatti, Silvia.

In: American Journal of Managed Care, Vol. 7, No. SPEC. ISS., 2001.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5a799d40a43d454ca3946e573fbfabb4,
title = "Factors associated with healthcare costs in women with fibromyalgia",
abstract = "Objective: To examine how women with high and low healthcare costs differ by using the Anderson Health Behavior Model of Utilization as a theoretical framework. Study design: One-year longitudinal design. Patients and methods: A total of 537 female health maintenance organization members with fibromyalgia participating in a study examining the effects of social support and education on health status and healthcare use were divided into 2 groups using a median split on health costs. Predisposing variables (demographic variables, self-efficacy, depression, and social support), enabling characteristics (income), and need variables (health status, perceived health status, disease severity, duration of symptoms, and comorbidity) were measured. Patients completed a battery of questionnaires at baseline assessment, and healthcare costs were assessed 1 year before and 1 year after baseline assessment. Healthcare data were collected from medical records. Healthcare costs were estimated by multiplying the number of each type of healthcare contact by the most recent national average cost figures. Results: Multivariate analysis of covariance controlling for costs during the year before baseline assessment was performed. Low-cost patients had fewer comorbid conditions, better health status, higher self-perceived health status, less disease severity, greater self-efficacy for functioning, lower depression scores, and higher social support scores. χ2 Analyses revealed no significant differences between groups on marital status but a significant difference in income low-cost patients were more likely to report higher incomes. Conclusions: There were several significant differences between people with higher and lower healthcare costs. Although effect sizes were small, many variables may be responsive to intervention.",
author = "Walen, {H. R.} and Cronan, {T. A.} and Silvia Bigatti",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "American Journal of Managed Care",
issn = "1088-0224",
publisher = "Ascend Media",
number = "SPEC. ISS.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors associated with healthcare costs in women with fibromyalgia

AU - Walen, H. R.

AU - Cronan, T. A.

AU - Bigatti, Silvia

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objective: To examine how women with high and low healthcare costs differ by using the Anderson Health Behavior Model of Utilization as a theoretical framework. Study design: One-year longitudinal design. Patients and methods: A total of 537 female health maintenance organization members with fibromyalgia participating in a study examining the effects of social support and education on health status and healthcare use were divided into 2 groups using a median split on health costs. Predisposing variables (demographic variables, self-efficacy, depression, and social support), enabling characteristics (income), and need variables (health status, perceived health status, disease severity, duration of symptoms, and comorbidity) were measured. Patients completed a battery of questionnaires at baseline assessment, and healthcare costs were assessed 1 year before and 1 year after baseline assessment. Healthcare data were collected from medical records. Healthcare costs were estimated by multiplying the number of each type of healthcare contact by the most recent national average cost figures. Results: Multivariate analysis of covariance controlling for costs during the year before baseline assessment was performed. Low-cost patients had fewer comorbid conditions, better health status, higher self-perceived health status, less disease severity, greater self-efficacy for functioning, lower depression scores, and higher social support scores. χ2 Analyses revealed no significant differences between groups on marital status but a significant difference in income low-cost patients were more likely to report higher incomes. Conclusions: There were several significant differences between people with higher and lower healthcare costs. Although effect sizes were small, many variables may be responsive to intervention.

AB - Objective: To examine how women with high and low healthcare costs differ by using the Anderson Health Behavior Model of Utilization as a theoretical framework. Study design: One-year longitudinal design. Patients and methods: A total of 537 female health maintenance organization members with fibromyalgia participating in a study examining the effects of social support and education on health status and healthcare use were divided into 2 groups using a median split on health costs. Predisposing variables (demographic variables, self-efficacy, depression, and social support), enabling characteristics (income), and need variables (health status, perceived health status, disease severity, duration of symptoms, and comorbidity) were measured. Patients completed a battery of questionnaires at baseline assessment, and healthcare costs were assessed 1 year before and 1 year after baseline assessment. Healthcare data were collected from medical records. Healthcare costs were estimated by multiplying the number of each type of healthcare contact by the most recent national average cost figures. Results: Multivariate analysis of covariance controlling for costs during the year before baseline assessment was performed. Low-cost patients had fewer comorbid conditions, better health status, higher self-perceived health status, less disease severity, greater self-efficacy for functioning, lower depression scores, and higher social support scores. χ2 Analyses revealed no significant differences between groups on marital status but a significant difference in income low-cost patients were more likely to report higher incomes. Conclusions: There were several significant differences between people with higher and lower healthcare costs. Although effect sizes were small, many variables may be responsive to intervention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4243450475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4243450475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - American Journal of Managed Care

JF - American Journal of Managed Care

SN - 1088-0224

IS - SPEC. ISS.

ER -