Feud and fable: the Sherrington-Horsley polemic and the delayed publication.

Joel Vilensky, James L. Stone, Sid Gilman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the February and March 1894 pages of The Lancet and in private letters, Charles Sherrington and Victor Horsley exchanged angry accusations pertaining to primacy of research on the course of the pyramidal fiber tract as determined from studies in monkeys. The polemics appear not to have ended in a manner satisfactory to either one. Moreover, the dispute allegedly led to a remarkable delay in publication of one of Sherrington's major contributions, which pertained to the localization of the motor cortex in apes that was published in 1917. Here we examine the argument in detail including the comments of an intermediary, Professor Rubert Boyce. We also examine the evidence for the supposed delay in publication, and conclude that the account of the delay originated in John Fulton's 1952 obituary of Sherrington, and is not true. We suggest it has become a fable that should no longer be repeated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)368-375
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the History of the Neurosciences
Volume12
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2003

Fingerprint

Publications
Pyramidal Tracts
Dissent and Disputes
Hominidae
Motor Cortex
Haplorhini
Research
Feud
Fable
Primacy
Monkey
Localization
Intermediaries
Fiber
Dispute
Letters
Cortex
Apes
Accusations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Feud and fable : the Sherrington-Horsley polemic and the delayed publication. / Vilensky, Joel; Stone, James L.; Gilman, Sid.

In: Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, Vol. 12, No. 4, 12.2003, p. 368-375.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1e650994b12a4d5d99fb246dde3ad298,
title = "Feud and fable: the Sherrington-Horsley polemic and the delayed publication.",
abstract = "In the February and March 1894 pages of The Lancet and in private letters, Charles Sherrington and Victor Horsley exchanged angry accusations pertaining to primacy of research on the course of the pyramidal fiber tract as determined from studies in monkeys. The polemics appear not to have ended in a manner satisfactory to either one. Moreover, the dispute allegedly led to a remarkable delay in publication of one of Sherrington's major contributions, which pertained to the localization of the motor cortex in apes that was published in 1917. Here we examine the argument in detail including the comments of an intermediary, Professor Rubert Boyce. We also examine the evidence for the supposed delay in publication, and conclude that the account of the delay originated in John Fulton's 1952 obituary of Sherrington, and is not true. We suggest it has become a fable that should no longer be repeated.",
author = "Joel Vilensky and Stone, {James L.} and Sid Gilman",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "368--375",
journal = "Journal of the History of the Neurosciences",
issn = "0964-704X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feud and fable

T2 - the Sherrington-Horsley polemic and the delayed publication.

AU - Vilensky, Joel

AU - Stone, James L.

AU - Gilman, Sid

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - In the February and March 1894 pages of The Lancet and in private letters, Charles Sherrington and Victor Horsley exchanged angry accusations pertaining to primacy of research on the course of the pyramidal fiber tract as determined from studies in monkeys. The polemics appear not to have ended in a manner satisfactory to either one. Moreover, the dispute allegedly led to a remarkable delay in publication of one of Sherrington's major contributions, which pertained to the localization of the motor cortex in apes that was published in 1917. Here we examine the argument in detail including the comments of an intermediary, Professor Rubert Boyce. We also examine the evidence for the supposed delay in publication, and conclude that the account of the delay originated in John Fulton's 1952 obituary of Sherrington, and is not true. We suggest it has become a fable that should no longer be repeated.

AB - In the February and March 1894 pages of The Lancet and in private letters, Charles Sherrington and Victor Horsley exchanged angry accusations pertaining to primacy of research on the course of the pyramidal fiber tract as determined from studies in monkeys. The polemics appear not to have ended in a manner satisfactory to either one. Moreover, the dispute allegedly led to a remarkable delay in publication of one of Sherrington's major contributions, which pertained to the localization of the motor cortex in apes that was published in 1917. Here we examine the argument in detail including the comments of an intermediary, Professor Rubert Boyce. We also examine the evidence for the supposed delay in publication, and conclude that the account of the delay originated in John Fulton's 1952 obituary of Sherrington, and is not true. We suggest it has become a fable that should no longer be repeated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3843094152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3843094152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15069867

AN - SCOPUS:3843094152

VL - 12

SP - 368

EP - 375

JO - Journal of the History of the Neurosciences

JF - Journal of the History of the Neurosciences

SN - 0964-704X

IS - 4

ER -