Fracture toughness of human bone under tension

T. L. Norman, D. Vashishth, David Burr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

168 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The longitudinal fracture toughnesses of human cortical bone were compared to those of bovine cortical bone to test the hypothesis that although human osteonal bone is significantly weaker and more compliant than primary (plexiform) bone, it is not less tough than primary bone. The fracture toughness indices, critical strain energy release rate (Gc) and critical stress intensity factor (Kc), were determined for human Haversian bone and bovine bone under tension (Mode I) loading using the compact tension method. The effects of thickness, crack growth range and anisotropy on fracture indices for slow stable crack growth in cortical bone were determined. Plane strain assumptions required for application of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) to bone were investigated. Longitudinal oriented fracture toughness tests were used to assess the crack inhibiting effect of human bone microstructure on frature resistance. Human bone Kc calculated from the stress concentration formula for 2 and 3 mm thick specimens equaled 4.32 and 4.05 MN m -3 2, respectively. Human bone Gc calculated from the compliance method equaled 827 Nm-1 for 2 mm thick specimens and 595 Nm-1 for 3 mm thick specimens. It was found that crack growth range, thickness and material assumptions affect fracture toughness. Kc calculated from Gc using an anisotropic relation provided the lowest estimate of Kc and equaled 3.31 MN m -3 2 for 2 mm thick specimens and 2.81 MN m -3 2 for 3 mm thick specimens. Both Kc and Gc were significantly reduced after being adjusted to ASTM standard thickness using ratios determined from bovine bone. The fracture toughness of bovine bone relative to human bone ranged from 1.08 to 1.66. This was compared to the longitudinal strength of bovine bone relative to the longitudinal strength of human bone which is approximately equal to 1.5. We found that even though human bone is significantly weaker than bovine bone, relative to its strength, the toughness of human and bovine bone are roughly similar, but the data were not sufficiently definitive to answer the question of which is tougher.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Fracture toughness
Bone
Bone and Bones
Crack propagation
Growth
Anisotropy
Mechanics
Compliance
Energy release rate
Strain energy
Fracture mechanics
Stress intensity factors
Toughness
Stress concentration

Keywords

  • bovine bone
  • crack propagation
  • fracture mechanics
  • Fracture toughness
  • human bone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Fracture toughness of human bone under tension. / Norman, T. L.; Vashishth, D.; Burr, David.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1995.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Norman, T. L. ; Vashishth, D. ; Burr, David. / Fracture toughness of human bone under tension. In: Journal of Biomechanics. 1995 ; Vol. 28, No. 3.
@article{e21328216a704a7494c62a1e966e188b,
title = "Fracture toughness of human bone under tension",
abstract = "The longitudinal fracture toughnesses of human cortical bone were compared to those of bovine cortical bone to test the hypothesis that although human osteonal bone is significantly weaker and more compliant than primary (plexiform) bone, it is not less tough than primary bone. The fracture toughness indices, critical strain energy release rate (Gc) and critical stress intensity factor (Kc), were determined for human Haversian bone and bovine bone under tension (Mode I) loading using the compact tension method. The effects of thickness, crack growth range and anisotropy on fracture indices for slow stable crack growth in cortical bone were determined. Plane strain assumptions required for application of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) to bone were investigated. Longitudinal oriented fracture toughness tests were used to assess the crack inhibiting effect of human bone microstructure on frature resistance. Human bone Kc calculated from the stress concentration formula for 2 and 3 mm thick specimens equaled 4.32 and 4.05 MN m -3 2, respectively. Human bone Gc calculated from the compliance method equaled 827 Nm-1 for 2 mm thick specimens and 595 Nm-1 for 3 mm thick specimens. It was found that crack growth range, thickness and material assumptions affect fracture toughness. Kc calculated from Gc using an anisotropic relation provided the lowest estimate of Kc and equaled 3.31 MN m -3 2 for 2 mm thick specimens and 2.81 MN m -3 2 for 3 mm thick specimens. Both Kc and Gc were significantly reduced after being adjusted to ASTM standard thickness using ratios determined from bovine bone. The fracture toughness of bovine bone relative to human bone ranged from 1.08 to 1.66. This was compared to the longitudinal strength of bovine bone relative to the longitudinal strength of human bone which is approximately equal to 1.5. We found that even though human bone is significantly weaker than bovine bone, relative to its strength, the toughness of human and bovine bone are roughly similar, but the data were not sufficiently definitive to answer the question of which is tougher.",
keywords = "bovine bone, crack propagation, fracture mechanics, Fracture toughness, human bone",
author = "Norman, {T. L.} and D. Vashishth and David Burr",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/0021-9290(94)00069-G",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fracture toughness of human bone under tension

AU - Norman, T. L.

AU - Vashishth, D.

AU - Burr, David

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - The longitudinal fracture toughnesses of human cortical bone were compared to those of bovine cortical bone to test the hypothesis that although human osteonal bone is significantly weaker and more compliant than primary (plexiform) bone, it is not less tough than primary bone. The fracture toughness indices, critical strain energy release rate (Gc) and critical stress intensity factor (Kc), were determined for human Haversian bone and bovine bone under tension (Mode I) loading using the compact tension method. The effects of thickness, crack growth range and anisotropy on fracture indices for slow stable crack growth in cortical bone were determined. Plane strain assumptions required for application of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) to bone were investigated. Longitudinal oriented fracture toughness tests were used to assess the crack inhibiting effect of human bone microstructure on frature resistance. Human bone Kc calculated from the stress concentration formula for 2 and 3 mm thick specimens equaled 4.32 and 4.05 MN m -3 2, respectively. Human bone Gc calculated from the compliance method equaled 827 Nm-1 for 2 mm thick specimens and 595 Nm-1 for 3 mm thick specimens. It was found that crack growth range, thickness and material assumptions affect fracture toughness. Kc calculated from Gc using an anisotropic relation provided the lowest estimate of Kc and equaled 3.31 MN m -3 2 for 2 mm thick specimens and 2.81 MN m -3 2 for 3 mm thick specimens. Both Kc and Gc were significantly reduced after being adjusted to ASTM standard thickness using ratios determined from bovine bone. The fracture toughness of bovine bone relative to human bone ranged from 1.08 to 1.66. This was compared to the longitudinal strength of bovine bone relative to the longitudinal strength of human bone which is approximately equal to 1.5. We found that even though human bone is significantly weaker than bovine bone, relative to its strength, the toughness of human and bovine bone are roughly similar, but the data were not sufficiently definitive to answer the question of which is tougher.

AB - The longitudinal fracture toughnesses of human cortical bone were compared to those of bovine cortical bone to test the hypothesis that although human osteonal bone is significantly weaker and more compliant than primary (plexiform) bone, it is not less tough than primary bone. The fracture toughness indices, critical strain energy release rate (Gc) and critical stress intensity factor (Kc), were determined for human Haversian bone and bovine bone under tension (Mode I) loading using the compact tension method. The effects of thickness, crack growth range and anisotropy on fracture indices for slow stable crack growth in cortical bone were determined. Plane strain assumptions required for application of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) to bone were investigated. Longitudinal oriented fracture toughness tests were used to assess the crack inhibiting effect of human bone microstructure on frature resistance. Human bone Kc calculated from the stress concentration formula for 2 and 3 mm thick specimens equaled 4.32 and 4.05 MN m -3 2, respectively. Human bone Gc calculated from the compliance method equaled 827 Nm-1 for 2 mm thick specimens and 595 Nm-1 for 3 mm thick specimens. It was found that crack growth range, thickness and material assumptions affect fracture toughness. Kc calculated from Gc using an anisotropic relation provided the lowest estimate of Kc and equaled 3.31 MN m -3 2 for 2 mm thick specimens and 2.81 MN m -3 2 for 3 mm thick specimens. Both Kc and Gc were significantly reduced after being adjusted to ASTM standard thickness using ratios determined from bovine bone. The fracture toughness of bovine bone relative to human bone ranged from 1.08 to 1.66. This was compared to the longitudinal strength of bovine bone relative to the longitudinal strength of human bone which is approximately equal to 1.5. We found that even though human bone is significantly weaker than bovine bone, relative to its strength, the toughness of human and bovine bone are roughly similar, but the data were not sufficiently definitive to answer the question of which is tougher.

KW - bovine bone

KW - crack propagation

KW - fracture mechanics

KW - Fracture toughness

KW - human bone

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029256469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029256469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0021-9290(94)00069-G

DO - 10.1016/0021-9290(94)00069-G

M3 - Article

VL - 28

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

IS - 3

ER -