Free-riding, fairness and the rights of minority groups in exemption from mandatory childhood vaccination.

Thomas May, Ross Silverman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authority of government to require participation in mandatory childhood vaccination programs may not target specific groups for either participation or exemption on a discriminatory basis. This poses difficulties when allowing religious or philosophical exemptions to mandatory vaccination, because certain groups are more likely to appeal for exemption. Avoiding loss of herd immunity, then, may require either discrimination against these groups by disallowing an exemption option that is available to others, or by denying the good of an exemption option to the entire population because of the action of certain groups. To avoid this unacceptable choice, steps must be taken now to more stringently enforce exemption requirements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-15
Number of pages4
JournalHuman Vaccines
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Minority Groups
Vaccination
Herd Immunity
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Cite this

Free-riding, fairness and the rights of minority groups in exemption from mandatory childhood vaccination. / May, Thomas; Silverman, Ross.

In: Human Vaccines, Vol. 1, No. 1, 01.01.2005, p. 12-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{66e1b582f0564bb494304349125849ed,
title = "Free-riding, fairness and the rights of minority groups in exemption from mandatory childhood vaccination.",
abstract = "The authority of government to require participation in mandatory childhood vaccination programs may not target specific groups for either participation or exemption on a discriminatory basis. This poses difficulties when allowing religious or philosophical exemptions to mandatory vaccination, because certain groups are more likely to appeal for exemption. Avoiding loss of herd immunity, then, may require either discrimination against these groups by disallowing an exemption option that is available to others, or by denying the good of an exemption option to the entire population because of the action of certain groups. To avoid this unacceptable choice, steps must be taken now to more stringently enforce exemption requirements.",
author = "Thomas May and Ross Silverman",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4161/hv.1.1.1425",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "12--15",
journal = "Human Vaccines",
issn = "1554-8600",
publisher = "Landes Bioscience",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Free-riding, fairness and the rights of minority groups in exemption from mandatory childhood vaccination.

AU - May, Thomas

AU - Silverman, Ross

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - The authority of government to require participation in mandatory childhood vaccination programs may not target specific groups for either participation or exemption on a discriminatory basis. This poses difficulties when allowing religious or philosophical exemptions to mandatory vaccination, because certain groups are more likely to appeal for exemption. Avoiding loss of herd immunity, then, may require either discrimination against these groups by disallowing an exemption option that is available to others, or by denying the good of an exemption option to the entire population because of the action of certain groups. To avoid this unacceptable choice, steps must be taken now to more stringently enforce exemption requirements.

AB - The authority of government to require participation in mandatory childhood vaccination programs may not target specific groups for either participation or exemption on a discriminatory basis. This poses difficulties when allowing religious or philosophical exemptions to mandatory vaccination, because certain groups are more likely to appeal for exemption. Avoiding loss of herd immunity, then, may require either discrimination against these groups by disallowing an exemption option that is available to others, or by denying the good of an exemption option to the entire population because of the action of certain groups. To avoid this unacceptable choice, steps must be taken now to more stringently enforce exemption requirements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645411521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645411521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4161/hv.1.1.1425

DO - 10.4161/hv.1.1.1425

M3 - Review article

C2 - 17038833

AN - SCOPUS:33645411521

VL - 1

SP - 12

EP - 15

JO - Human Vaccines

JF - Human Vaccines

SN - 1554-8600

IS - 1

ER -