Further Psychometric Evaluation and Revision of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in a National Sample

James F. Malec, Miriam Kragness, Randall W. Evans, Karen L. Finlay, Ann Kent, Muriel D. Lezak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the internal consistency of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI), further refine the instrument, and provide reference data based on a large, geographically diverse sample of persons with acquired brain injury (ABI). Subjects: 386 persons, most with moderate to severe ABI. Settings: Outpatient, community-based, and residential rehabilitation facilities for persons with ABI located in the United States: West, Midwest, and Southeast. Methods: Rasch, item cluster, principal components, and traditional psychometric analyses for internal consistency of MPAI data and subscales. Results: With rescoring of rating scales for 4 items, a 29-item version of the MPAI showed satisfactory internal consistency by Rasch (Person Reliability =.88; Item Reliability =.99) and traditional psychometric indicators (Cronbach's alpha = .89). Three rationally derived subscales for Ability, Activity and Participation demonstrated psychometric properties that were equivalent to subscales derived empirically through item cluster and factor analyses. For the 3 subscales, Person Reliability ranged from .78 to . 79; Item Reliability, from .98 to .99; and Cronbach's alpha, from .76 to .83. Subscales correlated moderately (Pearson r=.49-.65) with each other and strongly with the overall scale (Pearson r =.82-.86). Conclusions: Outcome after ABI is represented by the unitary dimension described by the MPAI. MPAI subscales further define regions of this dimension that may be useful for evaluation of clinical cases and program evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)479-492
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Volume18
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Brain Injuries
Equipment and Supplies
Residential Facilities
Aptitude
Program Evaluation
Statistical Factor Analysis
Cluster Analysis
Outpatients
Rehabilitation

Keywords

  • Brain injuries
  • Evaluation studies
  • Outcome measurement
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Malec, J. F., Kragness, M., Evans, R. W., Finlay, K. L., Kent, A., & Lezak, M. D. (2003). Further Psychometric Evaluation and Revision of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in a National Sample. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18(6), 479-492.

Further Psychometric Evaluation and Revision of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in a National Sample. / Malec, James F.; Kragness, Miriam; Evans, Randall W.; Finlay, Karen L.; Kent, Ann; Lezak, Muriel D.

In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 6, 11.2003, p. 479-492.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Malec, JF, Kragness, M, Evans, RW, Finlay, KL, Kent, A & Lezak, MD 2003, 'Further Psychometric Evaluation and Revision of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in a National Sample', Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 479-492.
Malec, James F. ; Kragness, Miriam ; Evans, Randall W. ; Finlay, Karen L. ; Kent, Ann ; Lezak, Muriel D. / Further Psychometric Evaluation and Revision of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in a National Sample. In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2003 ; Vol. 18, No. 6. pp. 479-492.
@article{04ed81b119cb4760b4717e94348a6b2b,
title = "Further Psychometric Evaluation and Revision of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in a National Sample",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate the internal consistency of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI), further refine the instrument, and provide reference data based on a large, geographically diverse sample of persons with acquired brain injury (ABI). Subjects: 386 persons, most with moderate to severe ABI. Settings: Outpatient, community-based, and residential rehabilitation facilities for persons with ABI located in the United States: West, Midwest, and Southeast. Methods: Rasch, item cluster, principal components, and traditional psychometric analyses for internal consistency of MPAI data and subscales. Results: With rescoring of rating scales for 4 items, a 29-item version of the MPAI showed satisfactory internal consistency by Rasch (Person Reliability =.88; Item Reliability =.99) and traditional psychometric indicators (Cronbach's alpha = .89). Three rationally derived subscales for Ability, Activity and Participation demonstrated psychometric properties that were equivalent to subscales derived empirically through item cluster and factor analyses. For the 3 subscales, Person Reliability ranged from .78 to . 79; Item Reliability, from .98 to .99; and Cronbach's alpha, from .76 to .83. Subscales correlated moderately (Pearson r=.49-.65) with each other and strongly with the overall scale (Pearson r =.82-.86). Conclusions: Outcome after ABI is represented by the unitary dimension described by the MPAI. MPAI subscales further define regions of this dimension that may be useful for evaluation of clinical cases and program evaluation.",
keywords = "Brain injuries, Evaluation studies, Outcome measurement, Rehabilitation",
author = "Malec, {James F.} and Miriam Kragness and Evans, {Randall W.} and Finlay, {Karen L.} and Ann Kent and Lezak, {Muriel D.}",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "479--492",
journal = "Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation",
issn = "0885-9701",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Further Psychometric Evaluation and Revision of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in a National Sample

AU - Malec, James F.

AU - Kragness, Miriam

AU - Evans, Randall W.

AU - Finlay, Karen L.

AU - Kent, Ann

AU - Lezak, Muriel D.

PY - 2003/11

Y1 - 2003/11

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the internal consistency of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI), further refine the instrument, and provide reference data based on a large, geographically diverse sample of persons with acquired brain injury (ABI). Subjects: 386 persons, most with moderate to severe ABI. Settings: Outpatient, community-based, and residential rehabilitation facilities for persons with ABI located in the United States: West, Midwest, and Southeast. Methods: Rasch, item cluster, principal components, and traditional psychometric analyses for internal consistency of MPAI data and subscales. Results: With rescoring of rating scales for 4 items, a 29-item version of the MPAI showed satisfactory internal consistency by Rasch (Person Reliability =.88; Item Reliability =.99) and traditional psychometric indicators (Cronbach's alpha = .89). Three rationally derived subscales for Ability, Activity and Participation demonstrated psychometric properties that were equivalent to subscales derived empirically through item cluster and factor analyses. For the 3 subscales, Person Reliability ranged from .78 to . 79; Item Reliability, from .98 to .99; and Cronbach's alpha, from .76 to .83. Subscales correlated moderately (Pearson r=.49-.65) with each other and strongly with the overall scale (Pearson r =.82-.86). Conclusions: Outcome after ABI is represented by the unitary dimension described by the MPAI. MPAI subscales further define regions of this dimension that may be useful for evaluation of clinical cases and program evaluation.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate the internal consistency of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI), further refine the instrument, and provide reference data based on a large, geographically diverse sample of persons with acquired brain injury (ABI). Subjects: 386 persons, most with moderate to severe ABI. Settings: Outpatient, community-based, and residential rehabilitation facilities for persons with ABI located in the United States: West, Midwest, and Southeast. Methods: Rasch, item cluster, principal components, and traditional psychometric analyses for internal consistency of MPAI data and subscales. Results: With rescoring of rating scales for 4 items, a 29-item version of the MPAI showed satisfactory internal consistency by Rasch (Person Reliability =.88; Item Reliability =.99) and traditional psychometric indicators (Cronbach's alpha = .89). Three rationally derived subscales for Ability, Activity and Participation demonstrated psychometric properties that were equivalent to subscales derived empirically through item cluster and factor analyses. For the 3 subscales, Person Reliability ranged from .78 to . 79; Item Reliability, from .98 to .99; and Cronbach's alpha, from .76 to .83. Subscales correlated moderately (Pearson r=.49-.65) with each other and strongly with the overall scale (Pearson r =.82-.86). Conclusions: Outcome after ABI is represented by the unitary dimension described by the MPAI. MPAI subscales further define regions of this dimension that may be useful for evaluation of clinical cases and program evaluation.

KW - Brain injuries

KW - Evaluation studies

KW - Outcome measurement

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344420000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344420000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 14707878

AN - SCOPUS:0344420000

VL - 18

SP - 479

EP - 492

JO - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

SN - 0885-9701

IS - 6

ER -