Future chlamydia screening preferences of men attending a sexually transmissible infection clinic

Alexis Roth, Barbara Van Der Pol, Brian Dodge, J. Fortenberry, Gregory Zimet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Despite years of public health efforts, Chlamydia trachomatis remains a highly prevalent disease suggesting that current control strategies are not sufficient. Asymptomatic men with chlamydial infections are under-identified and probably play an important role in sustaining the epidemic. Novel methods of actively screening asymptomatic men are needed to reduce the prevalence of chlamydia. This formative study explored the features of a sexually transmissible infection (STI) control program that would encourage annual testing among men. Methods: Using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, we explored issues related to health seeking behaviours and preferences for STI screening among men recruited from a public health STI clinic. Results: All 29 participants acknowledged the expertise of clinic staff and most men preferred speaking with a provider over using electronic informational resources. The clinic was the preferred venue for future screening, followed by self-collected home sampling with clinic drop-off. Men expressed a preference for receiving results via the telephone rather than electronic options, and preferred personalised reminders for future STI screening. Conclusions: In this sample, there was high interest in utilising the expertise of STI clinic personnel and less in non-clinical options. While this may be due to recruiting from an STI clinic, the data serves as a reminder that service provision must be responsive to the needs of potential users. Our findings suggest that future non-clinic based screening strategies may require an initial educational component to address concerns about confidentiality and sample quality in order to be acceptable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)419-426
Number of pages8
JournalSexual Health
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Chlamydia
Infection
Public Health
Confidentiality
Chlamydia trachomatis
Infection Control
Focus Groups
Telephone
Interviews
Health

Keywords

  • clinics
  • males
  • qualitative methods
  • testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Future chlamydia screening preferences of men attending a sexually transmissible infection clinic. / Roth, Alexis; Van Der Pol, Barbara; Dodge, Brian; Fortenberry, J.; Zimet, Gregory.

In: Sexual Health, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2011, p. 419-426.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{07dea44aa6ab41ab9fca68fa4b4f09ec,
title = "Future chlamydia screening preferences of men attending a sexually transmissible infection clinic",
abstract = "Background: Despite years of public health efforts, Chlamydia trachomatis remains a highly prevalent disease suggesting that current control strategies are not sufficient. Asymptomatic men with chlamydial infections are under-identified and probably play an important role in sustaining the epidemic. Novel methods of actively screening asymptomatic men are needed to reduce the prevalence of chlamydia. This formative study explored the features of a sexually transmissible infection (STI) control program that would encourage annual testing among men. Methods: Using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, we explored issues related to health seeking behaviours and preferences for STI screening among men recruited from a public health STI clinic. Results: All 29 participants acknowledged the expertise of clinic staff and most men preferred speaking with a provider over using electronic informational resources. The clinic was the preferred venue for future screening, followed by self-collected home sampling with clinic drop-off. Men expressed a preference for receiving results via the telephone rather than electronic options, and preferred personalised reminders for future STI screening. Conclusions: In this sample, there was high interest in utilising the expertise of STI clinic personnel and less in non-clinical options. While this may be due to recruiting from an STI clinic, the data serves as a reminder that service provision must be responsive to the needs of potential users. Our findings suggest that future non-clinic based screening strategies may require an initial educational component to address concerns about confidentiality and sample quality in order to be acceptable.",
keywords = "clinics, males, qualitative methods, testing",
author = "Alexis Roth and {Van Der Pol}, Barbara and Brian Dodge and J. Fortenberry and Gregory Zimet",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1071/SH10017",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "419--426",
journal = "Sexual Health",
issn = "1448-5028",
publisher = "CSIRO",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Future chlamydia screening preferences of men attending a sexually transmissible infection clinic

AU - Roth, Alexis

AU - Van Der Pol, Barbara

AU - Dodge, Brian

AU - Fortenberry, J.

AU - Zimet, Gregory

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Background: Despite years of public health efforts, Chlamydia trachomatis remains a highly prevalent disease suggesting that current control strategies are not sufficient. Asymptomatic men with chlamydial infections are under-identified and probably play an important role in sustaining the epidemic. Novel methods of actively screening asymptomatic men are needed to reduce the prevalence of chlamydia. This formative study explored the features of a sexually transmissible infection (STI) control program that would encourage annual testing among men. Methods: Using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, we explored issues related to health seeking behaviours and preferences for STI screening among men recruited from a public health STI clinic. Results: All 29 participants acknowledged the expertise of clinic staff and most men preferred speaking with a provider over using electronic informational resources. The clinic was the preferred venue for future screening, followed by self-collected home sampling with clinic drop-off. Men expressed a preference for receiving results via the telephone rather than electronic options, and preferred personalised reminders for future STI screening. Conclusions: In this sample, there was high interest in utilising the expertise of STI clinic personnel and less in non-clinical options. While this may be due to recruiting from an STI clinic, the data serves as a reminder that service provision must be responsive to the needs of potential users. Our findings suggest that future non-clinic based screening strategies may require an initial educational component to address concerns about confidentiality and sample quality in order to be acceptable.

AB - Background: Despite years of public health efforts, Chlamydia trachomatis remains a highly prevalent disease suggesting that current control strategies are not sufficient. Asymptomatic men with chlamydial infections are under-identified and probably play an important role in sustaining the epidemic. Novel methods of actively screening asymptomatic men are needed to reduce the prevalence of chlamydia. This formative study explored the features of a sexually transmissible infection (STI) control program that would encourage annual testing among men. Methods: Using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, we explored issues related to health seeking behaviours and preferences for STI screening among men recruited from a public health STI clinic. Results: All 29 participants acknowledged the expertise of clinic staff and most men preferred speaking with a provider over using electronic informational resources. The clinic was the preferred venue for future screening, followed by self-collected home sampling with clinic drop-off. Men expressed a preference for receiving results via the telephone rather than electronic options, and preferred personalised reminders for future STI screening. Conclusions: In this sample, there was high interest in utilising the expertise of STI clinic personnel and less in non-clinical options. While this may be due to recruiting from an STI clinic, the data serves as a reminder that service provision must be responsive to the needs of potential users. Our findings suggest that future non-clinic based screening strategies may require an initial educational component to address concerns about confidentiality and sample quality in order to be acceptable.

KW - clinics

KW - males

KW - qualitative methods

KW - testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860403848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860403848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1071/SH10017

DO - 10.1071/SH10017

M3 - Article

C2 - 21851785

AN - SCOPUS:84860403848

VL - 8

SP - 419

EP - 426

JO - Sexual Health

JF - Sexual Health

SN - 1448-5028

IS - 3

ER -