Gains in health insurance coverage explain variation in Democratic vote share in the 2008-2016 presidential elections

Alex Hollingsworth, Aparna Soni, Aaron Carroll, John Cawley, Kosali Simon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the last decade, health care reform has dominated U.S. public policy and political discourse. Double-digit rate increases in premiums in the Health Insurance Marketplaces established by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2018 make this an ongoing issue that could affect future elections. A seminal event that changed the course of policy and politics around health care reform is the 2016 presidential election. The results of the 2016 presidential election departed considerably from polling forecasts. Given the prominence of the Affordable Care Act in the election, we test whether changes in health insurance coverage at the county-level correlate with changes in party vote share in the presidential elections from 2008 through 2016. We find that a one-percentage-point increase in county health insurance coverage was associated with a 0.25-percentage-point increase in the vote share for the Democratic presidential candidate. We further find that these gains on the part of the Democratic candidate came almost fully at the expense of the Republican (as opposed to third-party) presidential candidates. We also estimate models separately for states that did and did not expand Medicaid and find no differential effect of insurance gains on Democratic vote share for states that expanded Medicaid compared to those that did not. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that outcomes in health insurance markets played a role in the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. The decisions made by the current administration, and how those decisions affect health insurance coverage and costs, may be important factors in future elections as well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0214206
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Health insurance
health insurance
Insurance Coverage
Health Insurance
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Health Care Reform
Medicaid
Health Insurance Exchanges
Health care
health services
markets
Politics
Public Policy
Insurance
Health Care Costs
politics
public policy
insurance
Costs
testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Gains in health insurance coverage explain variation in Democratic vote share in the 2008-2016 presidential elections. / Hollingsworth, Alex; Soni, Aparna; Carroll, Aaron; Cawley, John; Simon, Kosali.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 4, e0214206, 01.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hollingsworth, Alex ; Soni, Aparna ; Carroll, Aaron ; Cawley, John ; Simon, Kosali. / Gains in health insurance coverage explain variation in Democratic vote share in the 2008-2016 presidential elections. In: PLoS ONE. 2019 ; Vol. 14, No. 4.
@article{936bf7755b8b430fa3e4af4e65b7e5ad,
title = "Gains in health insurance coverage explain variation in Democratic vote share in the 2008-2016 presidential elections",
abstract = "In the last decade, health care reform has dominated U.S. public policy and political discourse. Double-digit rate increases in premiums in the Health Insurance Marketplaces established by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2018 make this an ongoing issue that could affect future elections. A seminal event that changed the course of policy and politics around health care reform is the 2016 presidential election. The results of the 2016 presidential election departed considerably from polling forecasts. Given the prominence of the Affordable Care Act in the election, we test whether changes in health insurance coverage at the county-level correlate with changes in party vote share in the presidential elections from 2008 through 2016. We find that a one-percentage-point increase in county health insurance coverage was associated with a 0.25-percentage-point increase in the vote share for the Democratic presidential candidate. We further find that these gains on the part of the Democratic candidate came almost fully at the expense of the Republican (as opposed to third-party) presidential candidates. We also estimate models separately for states that did and did not expand Medicaid and find no differential effect of insurance gains on Democratic vote share for states that expanded Medicaid compared to those that did not. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that outcomes in health insurance markets played a role in the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. The decisions made by the current administration, and how those decisions affect health insurance coverage and costs, may be important factors in future elections as well.",
author = "Alex Hollingsworth and Aparna Soni and Aaron Carroll and John Cawley and Kosali Simon",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0214206",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gains in health insurance coverage explain variation in Democratic vote share in the 2008-2016 presidential elections

AU - Hollingsworth, Alex

AU - Soni, Aparna

AU - Carroll, Aaron

AU - Cawley, John

AU - Simon, Kosali

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - In the last decade, health care reform has dominated U.S. public policy and political discourse. Double-digit rate increases in premiums in the Health Insurance Marketplaces established by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2018 make this an ongoing issue that could affect future elections. A seminal event that changed the course of policy and politics around health care reform is the 2016 presidential election. The results of the 2016 presidential election departed considerably from polling forecasts. Given the prominence of the Affordable Care Act in the election, we test whether changes in health insurance coverage at the county-level correlate with changes in party vote share in the presidential elections from 2008 through 2016. We find that a one-percentage-point increase in county health insurance coverage was associated with a 0.25-percentage-point increase in the vote share for the Democratic presidential candidate. We further find that these gains on the part of the Democratic candidate came almost fully at the expense of the Republican (as opposed to third-party) presidential candidates. We also estimate models separately for states that did and did not expand Medicaid and find no differential effect of insurance gains on Democratic vote share for states that expanded Medicaid compared to those that did not. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that outcomes in health insurance markets played a role in the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. The decisions made by the current administration, and how those decisions affect health insurance coverage and costs, may be important factors in future elections as well.

AB - In the last decade, health care reform has dominated U.S. public policy and political discourse. Double-digit rate increases in premiums in the Health Insurance Marketplaces established by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2018 make this an ongoing issue that could affect future elections. A seminal event that changed the course of policy and politics around health care reform is the 2016 presidential election. The results of the 2016 presidential election departed considerably from polling forecasts. Given the prominence of the Affordable Care Act in the election, we test whether changes in health insurance coverage at the county-level correlate with changes in party vote share in the presidential elections from 2008 through 2016. We find that a one-percentage-point increase in county health insurance coverage was associated with a 0.25-percentage-point increase in the vote share for the Democratic presidential candidate. We further find that these gains on the part of the Democratic candidate came almost fully at the expense of the Republican (as opposed to third-party) presidential candidates. We also estimate models separately for states that did and did not expand Medicaid and find no differential effect of insurance gains on Democratic vote share for states that expanded Medicaid compared to those that did not. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that outcomes in health insurance markets played a role in the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. The decisions made by the current administration, and how those decisions affect health insurance coverage and costs, may be important factors in future elections as well.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063954500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063954500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0214206

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0214206

M3 - Article

VL - 14

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 4

M1 - e0214206

ER -