Generic versus disease specific health status measures: Comparing the Sickness Impact Profile and the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales

M. Weinberger, G. P. Samsa, W. M. Tierney, M. J. Belyea, S. L. Hiner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Health services researchers frequently must choose between a generic health status measure, such as the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and a disease specific health status measure, such as the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS). In a longitudinal study of patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis, we examined the extent to which these 2 measures provide similar information. We found the SIP and AIMS to be significantly (p <0.001) correlated for physical (0.75-0.76) and total health (0.70-0.73). Correlations for psychological health were statistically significant, albeit modest (0.37-0.40). We conclude that, for most dimensions, investigators will obtain similar information using either well validated instrument.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)543-546
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Rheumatology
Volume19
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sickness Impact Profile
Health Status
Arthritis
Research Personnel
Hip Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis
Health
Health Services
Longitudinal Studies
Psychology

Keywords

  • functional status
  • health services research
  • health status

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology
  • Rheumatology

Cite this

Generic versus disease specific health status measures : Comparing the Sickness Impact Profile and the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. / Weinberger, M.; Samsa, G. P.; Tierney, W. M.; Belyea, M. J.; Hiner, S. L.

In: Journal of Rheumatology, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1992, p. 543-546.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weinberger, M. ; Samsa, G. P. ; Tierney, W. M. ; Belyea, M. J. ; Hiner, S. L. / Generic versus disease specific health status measures : Comparing the Sickness Impact Profile and the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. In: Journal of Rheumatology. 1992 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 543-546.
@article{1216401cf35d4b89a54e90e446adb54b,
title = "Generic versus disease specific health status measures: Comparing the Sickness Impact Profile and the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales",
abstract = "Health services researchers frequently must choose between a generic health status measure, such as the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and a disease specific health status measure, such as the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS). In a longitudinal study of patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis, we examined the extent to which these 2 measures provide similar information. We found the SIP and AIMS to be significantly (p <0.001) correlated for physical (0.75-0.76) and total health (0.70-0.73). Correlations for psychological health were statistically significant, albeit modest (0.37-0.40). We conclude that, for most dimensions, investigators will obtain similar information using either well validated instrument.",
keywords = "functional status, health services research, health status",
author = "M. Weinberger and Samsa, {G. P.} and Tierney, {W. M.} and Belyea, {M. J.} and Hiner, {S. L.}",
year = "1992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "543--546",
journal = "Journal of Rheumatology",
issn = "0315-162X",
publisher = "Journal of Rheumatology",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generic versus disease specific health status measures

T2 - Comparing the Sickness Impact Profile and the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales

AU - Weinberger, M.

AU - Samsa, G. P.

AU - Tierney, W. M.

AU - Belyea, M. J.

AU - Hiner, S. L.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Health services researchers frequently must choose between a generic health status measure, such as the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and a disease specific health status measure, such as the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS). In a longitudinal study of patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis, we examined the extent to which these 2 measures provide similar information. We found the SIP and AIMS to be significantly (p <0.001) correlated for physical (0.75-0.76) and total health (0.70-0.73). Correlations for psychological health were statistically significant, albeit modest (0.37-0.40). We conclude that, for most dimensions, investigators will obtain similar information using either well validated instrument.

AB - Health services researchers frequently must choose between a generic health status measure, such as the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and a disease specific health status measure, such as the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS). In a longitudinal study of patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis, we examined the extent to which these 2 measures provide similar information. We found the SIP and AIMS to be significantly (p <0.001) correlated for physical (0.75-0.76) and total health (0.70-0.73). Correlations for psychological health were statistically significant, albeit modest (0.37-0.40). We conclude that, for most dimensions, investigators will obtain similar information using either well validated instrument.

KW - functional status

KW - health services research

KW - health status

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026562669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026562669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1593575

AN - SCOPUS:0026562669

VL - 19

SP - 543

EP - 546

JO - Journal of Rheumatology

JF - Journal of Rheumatology

SN - 0315-162X

IS - 4

ER -