Geriatric care management for low-income seniors

A randomized controlled trial

Steven Counsell, Christopher Callahan, Daniel Clark, Wanzhu Tu, Amna B. Buttar, Timothy E. Stump, Gretchen D. Ricketts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

310 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Low-income seniors frequently have multiple chronic medical conditions for which they often fail to receive the recommended standard of care. Objectives: To test the effectiveness of a geriatric care management model on improving the quality of care for low-income seniors in primary care. Design, Setting, and Patients: Controlled clinical trial of 951 adults 65 years or older with an annual income less than 200% of the federal poverty level, whose primary care physicians were randomized from January 2002 through August 2004 to participate in the intervention (474 patients) or usual care (477 patients) in community-based health centers. Intervention: Patients received 2 years of home-based care management by a nurse practitioner and social worker who collaborated with the primary care physician and a geriatrics interdisciplinary team and were guided by 12 care protocols for common geriatric conditions. Main Outcome Measures: The Medical Outcomes 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) scales and summary measures; instrumental and basic activities of daily living (ADLs); and emergency department (ED) visits not resulting in hospitalization and hospitalizations. Results: Intention-to-treat analysis revealed significant improvements for intervention patients compared with usual care at 24 months in 4 of 8 SF-36 scales: general health (0.2 vs -2.3, P=.045), vitality (2.6 vs -2.6, P<.001), social functioning (3.0 vs -2.3, P=.008), and mental health (3.6 vs -0.3, P=.001); and in the Mental Component Summary (2.1 vs -0.3, P<.001). No group differences were found for ADLs or death. The cumulative 2-year ED visit rate per 1000 was lower in the intervention group (1445 [n=474] vs 1748 [n=477], P=.03) but hospital admission rates per 1000 were not significantly different between groups (700 [n=474] vs 740 [n=477], P=.66). In a predefined group at high risk of hospitalization (comprising 112 intervention and 114 usual-care patients), ED visit and hospital admission rates were lower for intervention patients in the second year (848 [n=106] vs 1314 [n=105]; P=.03 and 396 [n=106] vs 705 [n=105]; P=.03, respectively). Conclusions: Integrated and home-based geriatric care management resulted in improved quality of care and reduced acute care utilization among a high-risk group. Improvements in health-related quality of life were mixed and physical function outcomes did not differ between groups. Future studies are needed to determine whether more specific targeting will improve the program's effectiveness and whether reductions in acute care utilization will offset program costs. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00182962.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2623-2633
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Volume298
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 12 2007

Fingerprint

Geriatrics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Hospital Emergency Service
Hospitalization
Quality of Health Care
Primary Care Physicians
Activities of Daily Living
Patient Care
Community Health Centers
Intention to Treat Analysis
Nurse Practitioners
Controlled Clinical Trials
Program Evaluation
Poverty
Standard of Care
Home Care Services
Primary Health Care
Mental Health
Quality of Life
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Geriatric care management for low-income seniors : A randomized controlled trial. / Counsell, Steven; Callahan, Christopher; Clark, Daniel; Tu, Wanzhu; Buttar, Amna B.; Stump, Timothy E.; Ricketts, Gretchen D.

In: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 298, No. 22, 12.12.2007, p. 2623-2633.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2cd08039fc8b4a229b737d15142ae8df,
title = "Geriatric care management for low-income seniors: A randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Context: Low-income seniors frequently have multiple chronic medical conditions for which they often fail to receive the recommended standard of care. Objectives: To test the effectiveness of a geriatric care management model on improving the quality of care for low-income seniors in primary care. Design, Setting, and Patients: Controlled clinical trial of 951 adults 65 years or older with an annual income less than 200{\%} of the federal poverty level, whose primary care physicians were randomized from January 2002 through August 2004 to participate in the intervention (474 patients) or usual care (477 patients) in community-based health centers. Intervention: Patients received 2 years of home-based care management by a nurse practitioner and social worker who collaborated with the primary care physician and a geriatrics interdisciplinary team and were guided by 12 care protocols for common geriatric conditions. Main Outcome Measures: The Medical Outcomes 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) scales and summary measures; instrumental and basic activities of daily living (ADLs); and emergency department (ED) visits not resulting in hospitalization and hospitalizations. Results: Intention-to-treat analysis revealed significant improvements for intervention patients compared with usual care at 24 months in 4 of 8 SF-36 scales: general health (0.2 vs -2.3, P=.045), vitality (2.6 vs -2.6, P<.001), social functioning (3.0 vs -2.3, P=.008), and mental health (3.6 vs -0.3, P=.001); and in the Mental Component Summary (2.1 vs -0.3, P<.001). No group differences were found for ADLs or death. The cumulative 2-year ED visit rate per 1000 was lower in the intervention group (1445 [n=474] vs 1748 [n=477], P=.03) but hospital admission rates per 1000 were not significantly different between groups (700 [n=474] vs 740 [n=477], P=.66). In a predefined group at high risk of hospitalization (comprising 112 intervention and 114 usual-care patients), ED visit and hospital admission rates were lower for intervention patients in the second year (848 [n=106] vs 1314 [n=105]; P=.03 and 396 [n=106] vs 705 [n=105]; P=.03, respectively). Conclusions: Integrated and home-based geriatric care management resulted in improved quality of care and reduced acute care utilization among a high-risk group. Improvements in health-related quality of life were mixed and physical function outcomes did not differ between groups. Future studies are needed to determine whether more specific targeting will improve the program's effectiveness and whether reductions in acute care utilization will offset program costs. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00182962.",
author = "Steven Counsell and Christopher Callahan and Daniel Clark and Wanzhu Tu and Buttar, {Amna B.} and Stump, {Timothy E.} and Ricketts, {Gretchen D.}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1001/jama.298.22.2623",
language = "English",
volume = "298",
pages = "2623--2633",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0002-9955",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geriatric care management for low-income seniors

T2 - A randomized controlled trial

AU - Counsell, Steven

AU - Callahan, Christopher

AU - Clark, Daniel

AU - Tu, Wanzhu

AU - Buttar, Amna B.

AU - Stump, Timothy E.

AU - Ricketts, Gretchen D.

PY - 2007/12/12

Y1 - 2007/12/12

N2 - Context: Low-income seniors frequently have multiple chronic medical conditions for which they often fail to receive the recommended standard of care. Objectives: To test the effectiveness of a geriatric care management model on improving the quality of care for low-income seniors in primary care. Design, Setting, and Patients: Controlled clinical trial of 951 adults 65 years or older with an annual income less than 200% of the federal poverty level, whose primary care physicians were randomized from January 2002 through August 2004 to participate in the intervention (474 patients) or usual care (477 patients) in community-based health centers. Intervention: Patients received 2 years of home-based care management by a nurse practitioner and social worker who collaborated with the primary care physician and a geriatrics interdisciplinary team and were guided by 12 care protocols for common geriatric conditions. Main Outcome Measures: The Medical Outcomes 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) scales and summary measures; instrumental and basic activities of daily living (ADLs); and emergency department (ED) visits not resulting in hospitalization and hospitalizations. Results: Intention-to-treat analysis revealed significant improvements for intervention patients compared with usual care at 24 months in 4 of 8 SF-36 scales: general health (0.2 vs -2.3, P=.045), vitality (2.6 vs -2.6, P<.001), social functioning (3.0 vs -2.3, P=.008), and mental health (3.6 vs -0.3, P=.001); and in the Mental Component Summary (2.1 vs -0.3, P<.001). No group differences were found for ADLs or death. The cumulative 2-year ED visit rate per 1000 was lower in the intervention group (1445 [n=474] vs 1748 [n=477], P=.03) but hospital admission rates per 1000 were not significantly different between groups (700 [n=474] vs 740 [n=477], P=.66). In a predefined group at high risk of hospitalization (comprising 112 intervention and 114 usual-care patients), ED visit and hospital admission rates were lower for intervention patients in the second year (848 [n=106] vs 1314 [n=105]; P=.03 and 396 [n=106] vs 705 [n=105]; P=.03, respectively). Conclusions: Integrated and home-based geriatric care management resulted in improved quality of care and reduced acute care utilization among a high-risk group. Improvements in health-related quality of life were mixed and physical function outcomes did not differ between groups. Future studies are needed to determine whether more specific targeting will improve the program's effectiveness and whether reductions in acute care utilization will offset program costs. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00182962.

AB - Context: Low-income seniors frequently have multiple chronic medical conditions for which they often fail to receive the recommended standard of care. Objectives: To test the effectiveness of a geriatric care management model on improving the quality of care for low-income seniors in primary care. Design, Setting, and Patients: Controlled clinical trial of 951 adults 65 years or older with an annual income less than 200% of the federal poverty level, whose primary care physicians were randomized from January 2002 through August 2004 to participate in the intervention (474 patients) or usual care (477 patients) in community-based health centers. Intervention: Patients received 2 years of home-based care management by a nurse practitioner and social worker who collaborated with the primary care physician and a geriatrics interdisciplinary team and were guided by 12 care protocols for common geriatric conditions. Main Outcome Measures: The Medical Outcomes 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) scales and summary measures; instrumental and basic activities of daily living (ADLs); and emergency department (ED) visits not resulting in hospitalization and hospitalizations. Results: Intention-to-treat analysis revealed significant improvements for intervention patients compared with usual care at 24 months in 4 of 8 SF-36 scales: general health (0.2 vs -2.3, P=.045), vitality (2.6 vs -2.6, P<.001), social functioning (3.0 vs -2.3, P=.008), and mental health (3.6 vs -0.3, P=.001); and in the Mental Component Summary (2.1 vs -0.3, P<.001). No group differences were found for ADLs or death. The cumulative 2-year ED visit rate per 1000 was lower in the intervention group (1445 [n=474] vs 1748 [n=477], P=.03) but hospital admission rates per 1000 were not significantly different between groups (700 [n=474] vs 740 [n=477], P=.66). In a predefined group at high risk of hospitalization (comprising 112 intervention and 114 usual-care patients), ED visit and hospital admission rates were lower for intervention patients in the second year (848 [n=106] vs 1314 [n=105]; P=.03 and 396 [n=106] vs 705 [n=105]; P=.03, respectively). Conclusions: Integrated and home-based geriatric care management resulted in improved quality of care and reduced acute care utilization among a high-risk group. Improvements in health-related quality of life were mixed and physical function outcomes did not differ between groups. Future studies are needed to determine whether more specific targeting will improve the program's effectiveness and whether reductions in acute care utilization will offset program costs. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00182962.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37149028276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37149028276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jama.298.22.2623

DO - 10.1001/jama.298.22.2623

M3 - Article

VL - 298

SP - 2623

EP - 2633

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0002-9955

IS - 22

ER -