Giving patients granular control of personal health information: Using an ethics 'Points to Consider' to inform informatics system designers

Eric M. Meslin, Sheri A. Alpert, Aaron Carroll, Jere D. Odell, William M. Tierney, Peter Schwartz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: There are benefits and risks of giving patients more granular control of their personal health information in electronic health record (EHR) systems. When designing EHR systems and policies, informaticists and system developers must balance these benefits and risks. Ethical considerations should be an explicit part of this balancing. Our objective was to develop a structured ethics framework to accomplish this. Methods: We reviewed existing literature on the ethical and policy issues, developed an ethics framework called a "Points to Consider" (P2C) document, and convened a national expert panel to review and critique the P2C. Results: We developed the P2C to aid informaticists designing an advanced query tool for an electronic health record (EHR) system in Indianapolis. The P2C consists of six questions ("Points") that frame important ethical issues, apply accepted principles of bioethics and Fair Information Practices, comment on how questions might be answered, and address implications for patient care. Discussion: The P2C is intended to clarify what is at stake when designers try to accommodate potentially competing ethical commitments and logistical realities. The P2C was developed to guide informaticists who were designing a query tool in an existing EHR that would permit patient granular control. While consideration of ethical issues is coming to the forefront of medical informatics design and development practices, more reflection is needed to facilitate optimal collaboration between designers and ethicists. This report contributes to that discussion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1136-1143
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume82
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Personal Health Records
Informatics
Ethics
Electronic Health Records
Ethicists
Medical Informatics
Bioethics
Patient Care

Keywords

  • Computerized
  • Electronic health records
  • Ethics
  • Medical records systems
  • Patient access to records
  • Physician-patient relations
  • Privacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Giving patients granular control of personal health information : Using an ethics 'Points to Consider' to inform informatics system designers. / Meslin, Eric M.; Alpert, Sheri A.; Carroll, Aaron; Odell, Jere D.; Tierney, William M.; Schwartz, Peter.

In: International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 82, No. 12, 12.2013, p. 1136-1143.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bcdc4e0a2c7a4a6c9a0591d901a9faec,
title = "Giving patients granular control of personal health information: Using an ethics 'Points to Consider' to inform informatics system designers",
abstract = "Objective: There are benefits and risks of giving patients more granular control of their personal health information in electronic health record (EHR) systems. When designing EHR systems and policies, informaticists and system developers must balance these benefits and risks. Ethical considerations should be an explicit part of this balancing. Our objective was to develop a structured ethics framework to accomplish this. Methods: We reviewed existing literature on the ethical and policy issues, developed an ethics framework called a {"}Points to Consider{"} (P2C) document, and convened a national expert panel to review and critique the P2C. Results: We developed the P2C to aid informaticists designing an advanced query tool for an electronic health record (EHR) system in Indianapolis. The P2C consists of six questions ({"}Points{"}) that frame important ethical issues, apply accepted principles of bioethics and Fair Information Practices, comment on how questions might be answered, and address implications for patient care. Discussion: The P2C is intended to clarify what is at stake when designers try to accommodate potentially competing ethical commitments and logistical realities. The P2C was developed to guide informaticists who were designing a query tool in an existing EHR that would permit patient granular control. While consideration of ethical issues is coming to the forefront of medical informatics design and development practices, more reflection is needed to facilitate optimal collaboration between designers and ethicists. This report contributes to that discussion.",
keywords = "Computerized, Electronic health records, Ethics, Medical records systems, Patient access to records, Physician-patient relations, Privacy",
author = "Meslin, {Eric M.} and Alpert, {Sheri A.} and Aaron Carroll and Odell, {Jere D.} and Tierney, {William M.} and Peter Schwartz",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.08.010",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "1136--1143",
journal = "International Journal of Medical Informatics",
issn = "1386-5056",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Giving patients granular control of personal health information

T2 - Using an ethics 'Points to Consider' to inform informatics system designers

AU - Meslin, Eric M.

AU - Alpert, Sheri A.

AU - Carroll, Aaron

AU - Odell, Jere D.

AU - Tierney, William M.

AU - Schwartz, Peter

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Objective: There are benefits and risks of giving patients more granular control of their personal health information in electronic health record (EHR) systems. When designing EHR systems and policies, informaticists and system developers must balance these benefits and risks. Ethical considerations should be an explicit part of this balancing. Our objective was to develop a structured ethics framework to accomplish this. Methods: We reviewed existing literature on the ethical and policy issues, developed an ethics framework called a "Points to Consider" (P2C) document, and convened a national expert panel to review and critique the P2C. Results: We developed the P2C to aid informaticists designing an advanced query tool for an electronic health record (EHR) system in Indianapolis. The P2C consists of six questions ("Points") that frame important ethical issues, apply accepted principles of bioethics and Fair Information Practices, comment on how questions might be answered, and address implications for patient care. Discussion: The P2C is intended to clarify what is at stake when designers try to accommodate potentially competing ethical commitments and logistical realities. The P2C was developed to guide informaticists who were designing a query tool in an existing EHR that would permit patient granular control. While consideration of ethical issues is coming to the forefront of medical informatics design and development practices, more reflection is needed to facilitate optimal collaboration between designers and ethicists. This report contributes to that discussion.

AB - Objective: There are benefits and risks of giving patients more granular control of their personal health information in electronic health record (EHR) systems. When designing EHR systems and policies, informaticists and system developers must balance these benefits and risks. Ethical considerations should be an explicit part of this balancing. Our objective was to develop a structured ethics framework to accomplish this. Methods: We reviewed existing literature on the ethical and policy issues, developed an ethics framework called a "Points to Consider" (P2C) document, and convened a national expert panel to review and critique the P2C. Results: We developed the P2C to aid informaticists designing an advanced query tool for an electronic health record (EHR) system in Indianapolis. The P2C consists of six questions ("Points") that frame important ethical issues, apply accepted principles of bioethics and Fair Information Practices, comment on how questions might be answered, and address implications for patient care. Discussion: The P2C is intended to clarify what is at stake when designers try to accommodate potentially competing ethical commitments and logistical realities. The P2C was developed to guide informaticists who were designing a query tool in an existing EHR that would permit patient granular control. While consideration of ethical issues is coming to the forefront of medical informatics design and development practices, more reflection is needed to facilitate optimal collaboration between designers and ethicists. This report contributes to that discussion.

KW - Computerized

KW - Electronic health records

KW - Ethics

KW - Medical records systems

KW - Patient access to records

KW - Physician-patient relations

KW - Privacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888201299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888201299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.08.010

DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.08.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 24139626

AN - SCOPUS:84888201299

VL - 82

SP - 1136

EP - 1143

JO - International Journal of Medical Informatics

JF - International Journal of Medical Informatics

SN - 1386-5056

IS - 12

ER -