Goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation

James F. Malec

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

122 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Applications, controversies, and statistical issues related to goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation are examined on the basis of available literature and outcome data from a postacute brain injury rehabilitation programme. Prior studies suggest that GAS is a promising method for measuring progress towards the type of highly individualised goals that characterise rehabilitation. GAS appears useful for (1) monitoring progress in a time-limited epoch of care, (2) structuring team conferences, (3) planning and making decisions about ongoing rehabilitation, (4) ensuring concise, relevant communication to the client, significant others, referral source, and funding sources, (5) guiding the delivery of social reinforcement, and (6) evaluating the programme. In brain injury rehabilitation specifically, the highly structured, systematic, and concrete goal-setting process provided by GAS may be helpful in (7) encouraging more accurate self-awareness, and for (8) redeveloping the capacity for goal setting. In rehabilitation settings, GAS has shown superior sensitivity to change compared to other functional outcome measures, excellent inter-rater reliability, and satisfactory concurrent validity with other outcome measures. Concerns about the idiosyncratic nature of GAS measures may not be as pertinent in rehabilitation as in mental health. For instance, the concurrent validity of GAS in rehabilitation generally appears stronger than in mental health settings. Nonetheless, GAS is probably best employed as one facet of a comprehensive outcome measurement system that also includes standardised measures of functional outcomes. The inclusion of GAS in a comprehensive outcome measurement system is recommended by its potential benefits, particularly its responsiveness to change, and its sensitivity to the values of clients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-275
Number of pages23
JournalNeuropsychological Rehabilitation
Volume9
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rehabilitation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Brain Injuries
Scaling
Mental Health
Social Reinforcement
Decision Making
Referral and Consultation
Communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation. / Malec, James F.

In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, Vol. 9, No. 3-4, 07.1999, p. 253-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Malec, James F. / Goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation. In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 1999 ; Vol. 9, No. 3-4. pp. 253-275.
@article{596c312e4f3b48ca945e436cbe775c52,
title = "Goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation",
abstract = "Applications, controversies, and statistical issues related to goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation are examined on the basis of available literature and outcome data from a postacute brain injury rehabilitation programme. Prior studies suggest that GAS is a promising method for measuring progress towards the type of highly individualised goals that characterise rehabilitation. GAS appears useful for (1) monitoring progress in a time-limited epoch of care, (2) structuring team conferences, (3) planning and making decisions about ongoing rehabilitation, (4) ensuring concise, relevant communication to the client, significant others, referral source, and funding sources, (5) guiding the delivery of social reinforcement, and (6) evaluating the programme. In brain injury rehabilitation specifically, the highly structured, systematic, and concrete goal-setting process provided by GAS may be helpful in (7) encouraging more accurate self-awareness, and for (8) redeveloping the capacity for goal setting. In rehabilitation settings, GAS has shown superior sensitivity to change compared to other functional outcome measures, excellent inter-rater reliability, and satisfactory concurrent validity with other outcome measures. Concerns about the idiosyncratic nature of GAS measures may not be as pertinent in rehabilitation as in mental health. For instance, the concurrent validity of GAS in rehabilitation generally appears stronger than in mental health settings. Nonetheless, GAS is probably best employed as one facet of a comprehensive outcome measurement system that also includes standardised measures of functional outcomes. The inclusion of GAS in a comprehensive outcome measurement system is recommended by its potential benefits, particularly its responsiveness to change, and its sensitivity to the values of clients.",
author = "Malec, {James F.}",
year = "1999",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/096020199389365",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "253--275",
journal = "Neuropsychological Rehabilitation",
issn = "0960-2011",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation

AU - Malec, James F.

PY - 1999/7

Y1 - 1999/7

N2 - Applications, controversies, and statistical issues related to goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation are examined on the basis of available literature and outcome data from a postacute brain injury rehabilitation programme. Prior studies suggest that GAS is a promising method for measuring progress towards the type of highly individualised goals that characterise rehabilitation. GAS appears useful for (1) monitoring progress in a time-limited epoch of care, (2) structuring team conferences, (3) planning and making decisions about ongoing rehabilitation, (4) ensuring concise, relevant communication to the client, significant others, referral source, and funding sources, (5) guiding the delivery of social reinforcement, and (6) evaluating the programme. In brain injury rehabilitation specifically, the highly structured, systematic, and concrete goal-setting process provided by GAS may be helpful in (7) encouraging more accurate self-awareness, and for (8) redeveloping the capacity for goal setting. In rehabilitation settings, GAS has shown superior sensitivity to change compared to other functional outcome measures, excellent inter-rater reliability, and satisfactory concurrent validity with other outcome measures. Concerns about the idiosyncratic nature of GAS measures may not be as pertinent in rehabilitation as in mental health. For instance, the concurrent validity of GAS in rehabilitation generally appears stronger than in mental health settings. Nonetheless, GAS is probably best employed as one facet of a comprehensive outcome measurement system that also includes standardised measures of functional outcomes. The inclusion of GAS in a comprehensive outcome measurement system is recommended by its potential benefits, particularly its responsiveness to change, and its sensitivity to the values of clients.

AB - Applications, controversies, and statistical issues related to goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation are examined on the basis of available literature and outcome data from a postacute brain injury rehabilitation programme. Prior studies suggest that GAS is a promising method for measuring progress towards the type of highly individualised goals that characterise rehabilitation. GAS appears useful for (1) monitoring progress in a time-limited epoch of care, (2) structuring team conferences, (3) planning and making decisions about ongoing rehabilitation, (4) ensuring concise, relevant communication to the client, significant others, referral source, and funding sources, (5) guiding the delivery of social reinforcement, and (6) evaluating the programme. In brain injury rehabilitation specifically, the highly structured, systematic, and concrete goal-setting process provided by GAS may be helpful in (7) encouraging more accurate self-awareness, and for (8) redeveloping the capacity for goal setting. In rehabilitation settings, GAS has shown superior sensitivity to change compared to other functional outcome measures, excellent inter-rater reliability, and satisfactory concurrent validity with other outcome measures. Concerns about the idiosyncratic nature of GAS measures may not be as pertinent in rehabilitation as in mental health. For instance, the concurrent validity of GAS in rehabilitation generally appears stronger than in mental health settings. Nonetheless, GAS is probably best employed as one facet of a comprehensive outcome measurement system that also includes standardised measures of functional outcomes. The inclusion of GAS in a comprehensive outcome measurement system is recommended by its potential benefits, particularly its responsiveness to change, and its sensitivity to the values of clients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032823082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032823082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/096020199389365

DO - 10.1080/096020199389365

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032823082

VL - 9

SP - 253

EP - 275

JO - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

JF - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

SN - 0960-2011

IS - 3-4

ER -