Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry are not correlated with central corneal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma

Guy Regev, Alon Harris, Brent Siesky, Yochai Shoshani, Patrick Egan, Adam Moss, Miriam Zalish, Darrell WuDunn, Rita Ehrlich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and assess their relationship to central corneal thickness (CCT) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (OAG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: GAT, DCT, and CCT were assessed in 116 patients with OAG [mean age 65.9 (10.5); 59% female] participating in the Indianapolis Glaucoma Progression Study. GAT and DCT were measured in a randomized order followed by CCT (ultrasonic corneal pachymetry) during a single study visit. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the limits of agreement between tonometery methodologies whereas multivariate regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of CCT on GAT and DCT IOP measurements. RESULTS: IOP values obtained by DCT and GAT showed a strong positive correlation in patients with OAG (r=0.93; P<0.001). Mean IOP measured with DCT [18.4 (5.1) mm Hg] was significantly higher (P<0.001) than GAT IOP measurements [16.5 (4.5) mmHg]. CCT did not seem to influence either GAT or DCT measurements (r=0.1025, P=0.16; r=0.05, P=0.46), respectively. The Bland-Altman data showed that the amount of disagreement between IOP assessment techniques varied, suggesting a proportional bias. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients with OAG, there was a strong correlation between GAT and DCT measurements of IOP. IOP measured with DCT was consistently higher than IOP measured with GAT. Neither GAT nor DCT measurements were correlated with CCT. This data suggests that factors other than CCT may be involved in the tendency of DCT to produce higher measures of IOP than GAT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-286
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Glaucoma
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Manometry
Intraocular Pressure
Open Angle Glaucoma
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Corneal Pachymetry

Keywords

  • cornea
  • glaucoma
  • Goldmann
  • intraocular pressure
  • pascal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry are not correlated with central corneal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma. / Regev, Guy; Harris, Alon; Siesky, Brent; Shoshani, Yochai; Egan, Patrick; Moss, Adam; Zalish, Miriam; WuDunn, Darrell; Ehrlich, Rita.

In: Journal of Glaucoma, Vol. 20, No. 5, 06.2011, p. 282-286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Regev, Guy ; Harris, Alon ; Siesky, Brent ; Shoshani, Yochai ; Egan, Patrick ; Moss, Adam ; Zalish, Miriam ; WuDunn, Darrell ; Ehrlich, Rita. / Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry are not correlated with central corneal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma. In: Journal of Glaucoma. 2011 ; Vol. 20, No. 5. pp. 282-286.
@article{0be65821f0574b569b1012cfb576ab6a,
title = "Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry are not correlated with central corneal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and assess their relationship to central corneal thickness (CCT) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (OAG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: GAT, DCT, and CCT were assessed in 116 patients with OAG [mean age 65.9 (10.5); 59{\%} female] participating in the Indianapolis Glaucoma Progression Study. GAT and DCT were measured in a randomized order followed by CCT (ultrasonic corneal pachymetry) during a single study visit. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the limits of agreement between tonometery methodologies whereas multivariate regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of CCT on GAT and DCT IOP measurements. RESULTS: IOP values obtained by DCT and GAT showed a strong positive correlation in patients with OAG (r=0.93; P<0.001). Mean IOP measured with DCT [18.4 (5.1) mm Hg] was significantly higher (P<0.001) than GAT IOP measurements [16.5 (4.5) mmHg]. CCT did not seem to influence either GAT or DCT measurements (r=0.1025, P=0.16; r=0.05, P=0.46), respectively. The Bland-Altman data showed that the amount of disagreement between IOP assessment techniques varied, suggesting a proportional bias. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients with OAG, there was a strong correlation between GAT and DCT measurements of IOP. IOP measured with DCT was consistently higher than IOP measured with GAT. Neither GAT nor DCT measurements were correlated with CCT. This data suggests that factors other than CCT may be involved in the tendency of DCT to produce higher measures of IOP than GAT.",
keywords = "cornea, glaucoma, Goldmann, intraocular pressure, pascal",
author = "Guy Regev and Alon Harris and Brent Siesky and Yochai Shoshani and Patrick Egan and Adam Moss and Miriam Zalish and Darrell WuDunn and Rita Ehrlich",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181e66498",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "282--286",
journal = "Journal of Glaucoma",
issn = "1057-0829",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry are not correlated with central corneal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma

AU - Regev, Guy

AU - Harris, Alon

AU - Siesky, Brent

AU - Shoshani, Yochai

AU - Egan, Patrick

AU - Moss, Adam

AU - Zalish, Miriam

AU - WuDunn, Darrell

AU - Ehrlich, Rita

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and assess their relationship to central corneal thickness (CCT) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (OAG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: GAT, DCT, and CCT were assessed in 116 patients with OAG [mean age 65.9 (10.5); 59% female] participating in the Indianapolis Glaucoma Progression Study. GAT and DCT were measured in a randomized order followed by CCT (ultrasonic corneal pachymetry) during a single study visit. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the limits of agreement between tonometery methodologies whereas multivariate regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of CCT on GAT and DCT IOP measurements. RESULTS: IOP values obtained by DCT and GAT showed a strong positive correlation in patients with OAG (r=0.93; P<0.001). Mean IOP measured with DCT [18.4 (5.1) mm Hg] was significantly higher (P<0.001) than GAT IOP measurements [16.5 (4.5) mmHg]. CCT did not seem to influence either GAT or DCT measurements (r=0.1025, P=0.16; r=0.05, P=0.46), respectively. The Bland-Altman data showed that the amount of disagreement between IOP assessment techniques varied, suggesting a proportional bias. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients with OAG, there was a strong correlation between GAT and DCT measurements of IOP. IOP measured with DCT was consistently higher than IOP measured with GAT. Neither GAT nor DCT measurements were correlated with CCT. This data suggests that factors other than CCT may be involved in the tendency of DCT to produce higher measures of IOP than GAT.

AB - PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and assess their relationship to central corneal thickness (CCT) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (OAG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: GAT, DCT, and CCT were assessed in 116 patients with OAG [mean age 65.9 (10.5); 59% female] participating in the Indianapolis Glaucoma Progression Study. GAT and DCT were measured in a randomized order followed by CCT (ultrasonic corneal pachymetry) during a single study visit. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the limits of agreement between tonometery methodologies whereas multivariate regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of CCT on GAT and DCT IOP measurements. RESULTS: IOP values obtained by DCT and GAT showed a strong positive correlation in patients with OAG (r=0.93; P<0.001). Mean IOP measured with DCT [18.4 (5.1) mm Hg] was significantly higher (P<0.001) than GAT IOP measurements [16.5 (4.5) mmHg]. CCT did not seem to influence either GAT or DCT measurements (r=0.1025, P=0.16; r=0.05, P=0.46), respectively. The Bland-Altman data showed that the amount of disagreement between IOP assessment techniques varied, suggesting a proportional bias. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients with OAG, there was a strong correlation between GAT and DCT measurements of IOP. IOP measured with DCT was consistently higher than IOP measured with GAT. Neither GAT nor DCT measurements were correlated with CCT. This data suggests that factors other than CCT may be involved in the tendency of DCT to produce higher measures of IOP than GAT.

KW - cornea

KW - glaucoma

KW - Goldmann

KW - intraocular pressure

KW - pascal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958793961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958793961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181e66498

DO - 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181e66498

M3 - Article

C2 - 20577097

AN - SCOPUS:79958793961

VL - 20

SP - 282

EP - 286

JO - Journal of Glaucoma

JF - Journal of Glaucoma

SN - 1057-0829

IS - 5

ER -