"Having the right chemistry": A qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine

Vicki A. Jackson, Anita Palepu, Laura Szalacha, Cheryl Caswell, Phyllis L. Carr, Thomas Inui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

236 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. To develop a deeper understanding of mentoring by exploring lived experiences of academic medicine faculty members. Mentoring relationships are key to developing productive careers in academic medicine, but such alliances hold a certain "mystery." Method. Using qualitative techniques, between November 1999 and March 2000, the authors conducted individual telephone interviews of 16 faculty members about their experiences with mentoring. Interviews were taped and transcribed and authors identified major themes through multiple readings. A consensus taxonomy for classifying content evolved from comparisons of coding by four reviewers. Themes expressed by participants were studied for patterns of connection and grouped into broader categories. Results. Almost 98% of participants identified lack of mentoring as the first (42%) or second (56%) most important factor hindering career progress in academic medicine. Finding a suitable mentor requires effort and persistence. Effective mentoring necessitates a certain chemistry for an appropriate interpersonal match. Prized mentors have "clout," knowledge, and interest in the mentees, and provide both professional and personal support. In cross-gender mentoring, maintaining clear boundaries is essential for an effective relationship. Samegender or same-race matches between mentor and mentee were not felt to be essential. Conclusions. Having a mentor is critical to having a successful career in academic medicine. Mentees need to be diligent in seeking out these relationships and institutions need to encourage and value the work of mentors. Participants without formalized mentoring relationships should look to peers and colleagues for assistance in navigating the academic system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)328-334
Number of pages7
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume78
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1 2003

Fingerprint

mentoring
Mentors
chemistry
Medicine
medicine
career
Interviews
telephone interview
Mentoring
taxonomy
persistence
Reading
coding
experience
assistance
lack
gender
interview
Values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Education

Cite this

Jackson, V. A., Palepu, A., Szalacha, L., Caswell, C., Carr, P. L., & Inui, T. (2003). "Having the right chemistry": A qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. Academic Medicine, 78(3), 328-334.

"Having the right chemistry" : A qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. / Jackson, Vicki A.; Palepu, Anita; Szalacha, Laura; Caswell, Cheryl; Carr, Phyllis L.; Inui, Thomas.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 78, No. 3, 01.03.2003, p. 328-334.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jackson, VA, Palepu, A, Szalacha, L, Caswell, C, Carr, PL & Inui, T 2003, '"Having the right chemistry": A qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine', Academic Medicine, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 328-334.
Jackson VA, Palepu A, Szalacha L, Caswell C, Carr PL, Inui T. "Having the right chemistry": A qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. Academic Medicine. 2003 Mar 1;78(3):328-334.
Jackson, Vicki A. ; Palepu, Anita ; Szalacha, Laura ; Caswell, Cheryl ; Carr, Phyllis L. ; Inui, Thomas. / "Having the right chemistry" : A qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. In: Academic Medicine. 2003 ; Vol. 78, No. 3. pp. 328-334.
@article{7ca6d12c79054063b2c266e9479ae704,
title = "{"}Having the right chemistry{"}: A qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine",
abstract = "Purpose. To develop a deeper understanding of mentoring by exploring lived experiences of academic medicine faculty members. Mentoring relationships are key to developing productive careers in academic medicine, but such alliances hold a certain {"}mystery.{"} Method. Using qualitative techniques, between November 1999 and March 2000, the authors conducted individual telephone interviews of 16 faculty members about their experiences with mentoring. Interviews were taped and transcribed and authors identified major themes through multiple readings. A consensus taxonomy for classifying content evolved from comparisons of coding by four reviewers. Themes expressed by participants were studied for patterns of connection and grouped into broader categories. Results. Almost 98{\%} of participants identified lack of mentoring as the first (42{\%}) or second (56{\%}) most important factor hindering career progress in academic medicine. Finding a suitable mentor requires effort and persistence. Effective mentoring necessitates a certain chemistry for an appropriate interpersonal match. Prized mentors have {"}clout,{"} knowledge, and interest in the mentees, and provide both professional and personal support. In cross-gender mentoring, maintaining clear boundaries is essential for an effective relationship. Samegender or same-race matches between mentor and mentee were not felt to be essential. Conclusions. Having a mentor is critical to having a successful career in academic medicine. Mentees need to be diligent in seeking out these relationships and institutions need to encourage and value the work of mentors. Participants without formalized mentoring relationships should look to peers and colleagues for assistance in navigating the academic system.",
author = "Jackson, {Vicki A.} and Anita Palepu and Laura Szalacha and Cheryl Caswell and Carr, {Phyllis L.} and Thomas Inui",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "328--334",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Having the right chemistry"

T2 - A qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine

AU - Jackson, Vicki A.

AU - Palepu, Anita

AU - Szalacha, Laura

AU - Caswell, Cheryl

AU - Carr, Phyllis L.

AU - Inui, Thomas

PY - 2003/3/1

Y1 - 2003/3/1

N2 - Purpose. To develop a deeper understanding of mentoring by exploring lived experiences of academic medicine faculty members. Mentoring relationships are key to developing productive careers in academic medicine, but such alliances hold a certain "mystery." Method. Using qualitative techniques, between November 1999 and March 2000, the authors conducted individual telephone interviews of 16 faculty members about their experiences with mentoring. Interviews were taped and transcribed and authors identified major themes through multiple readings. A consensus taxonomy for classifying content evolved from comparisons of coding by four reviewers. Themes expressed by participants were studied for patterns of connection and grouped into broader categories. Results. Almost 98% of participants identified lack of mentoring as the first (42%) or second (56%) most important factor hindering career progress in academic medicine. Finding a suitable mentor requires effort and persistence. Effective mentoring necessitates a certain chemistry for an appropriate interpersonal match. Prized mentors have "clout," knowledge, and interest in the mentees, and provide both professional and personal support. In cross-gender mentoring, maintaining clear boundaries is essential for an effective relationship. Samegender or same-race matches between mentor and mentee were not felt to be essential. Conclusions. Having a mentor is critical to having a successful career in academic medicine. Mentees need to be diligent in seeking out these relationships and institutions need to encourage and value the work of mentors. Participants without formalized mentoring relationships should look to peers and colleagues for assistance in navigating the academic system.

AB - Purpose. To develop a deeper understanding of mentoring by exploring lived experiences of academic medicine faculty members. Mentoring relationships are key to developing productive careers in academic medicine, but such alliances hold a certain "mystery." Method. Using qualitative techniques, between November 1999 and March 2000, the authors conducted individual telephone interviews of 16 faculty members about their experiences with mentoring. Interviews were taped and transcribed and authors identified major themes through multiple readings. A consensus taxonomy for classifying content evolved from comparisons of coding by four reviewers. Themes expressed by participants were studied for patterns of connection and grouped into broader categories. Results. Almost 98% of participants identified lack of mentoring as the first (42%) or second (56%) most important factor hindering career progress in academic medicine. Finding a suitable mentor requires effort and persistence. Effective mentoring necessitates a certain chemistry for an appropriate interpersonal match. Prized mentors have "clout," knowledge, and interest in the mentees, and provide both professional and personal support. In cross-gender mentoring, maintaining clear boundaries is essential for an effective relationship. Samegender or same-race matches between mentor and mentee were not felt to be essential. Conclusions. Having a mentor is critical to having a successful career in academic medicine. Mentees need to be diligent in seeking out these relationships and institutions need to encourage and value the work of mentors. Participants without formalized mentoring relationships should look to peers and colleagues for assistance in navigating the academic system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037343701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037343701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12634219

AN - SCOPUS:0037343701

VL - 78

SP - 328

EP - 334

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 3

ER -