Health information technology vendor selection strategies and total factor productivity

Eric W. Ford, Timothy R. Huerta, Nir Menachemi, Mark A. Thompson, Feliciano Yu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to compare health information technology (HIT) adoption strategies' relative performance on hospital-level productivity measures. DATA SOURCES:: The American Hospital Association's Annual Survey and Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Analytics for fiscal years 2002 through 2007 were used for this study. STUDY DESIGN:: A two-stage approach is employed. First, a Malmquist model is specified to calculate hospital-level productivity measures. A logistic regression model is then estimated to compare the three HIT adoption strategies' relative performance on the newly constructed productivity measures. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:: The HIT vendor selection strategy impacts the amount of technological change required of an organization but does not appear to have either a positive or adverse impact on technical efficiency or total factor productivity. CONCLUSIONS:: The higher levels in technological change experienced by hospitals using the best of breed and best of suite HIT vendor selection strategies may have a more direct impact on the organization early on in the process. However, these gains did not appear to translate into either increased technical efficiency or total factor productivity during the period studied. Over a longer period, one HIT vendor selection strategy may yet prove to be more effective at improving efficiency and productivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)177-187
Number of pages11
JournalHealth Care Management Review
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medical Informatics
Logistic Models
American Hospital Association
Organizations
Management Information Systems
Health Care Surveys
Vendor selection
Total factor productivity
Health information technology
Productivity

Keywords

  • data envelopment analyses
  • health information technology
  • productivity
  • vendor selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Health information technology vendor selection strategies and total factor productivity. / Ford, Eric W.; Huerta, Timothy R.; Menachemi, Nir; Thompson, Mark A.; Yu, Feliciano.

In: Health Care Management Review, Vol. 38, No. 3, 01.07.2013, p. 177-187.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ford, Eric W. ; Huerta, Timothy R. ; Menachemi, Nir ; Thompson, Mark A. ; Yu, Feliciano. / Health information technology vendor selection strategies and total factor productivity. In: Health Care Management Review. 2013 ; Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 177-187.
@article{f8678a0811064f73ab2d3a3cf2557311,
title = "Health information technology vendor selection strategies and total factor productivity",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to compare health information technology (HIT) adoption strategies' relative performance on hospital-level productivity measures. DATA SOURCES:: The American Hospital Association's Annual Survey and Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Analytics for fiscal years 2002 through 2007 were used for this study. STUDY DESIGN:: A two-stage approach is employed. First, a Malmquist model is specified to calculate hospital-level productivity measures. A logistic regression model is then estimated to compare the three HIT adoption strategies' relative performance on the newly constructed productivity measures. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:: The HIT vendor selection strategy impacts the amount of technological change required of an organization but does not appear to have either a positive or adverse impact on technical efficiency or total factor productivity. CONCLUSIONS:: The higher levels in technological change experienced by hospitals using the best of breed and best of suite HIT vendor selection strategies may have a more direct impact on the organization early on in the process. However, these gains did not appear to translate into either increased technical efficiency or total factor productivity during the period studied. Over a longer period, one HIT vendor selection strategy may yet prove to be more effective at improving efficiency and productivity.",
keywords = "data envelopment analyses, health information technology, productivity, vendor selection",
author = "Ford, {Eric W.} and Huerta, {Timothy R.} and Nir Menachemi and Thompson, {Mark A.} and Feliciano Yu",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182572c7b",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "177--187",
journal = "Health Care Management Review",
issn = "0361-6274",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health information technology vendor selection strategies and total factor productivity

AU - Ford, Eric W.

AU - Huerta, Timothy R.

AU - Menachemi, Nir

AU - Thompson, Mark A.

AU - Yu, Feliciano

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to compare health information technology (HIT) adoption strategies' relative performance on hospital-level productivity measures. DATA SOURCES:: The American Hospital Association's Annual Survey and Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Analytics for fiscal years 2002 through 2007 were used for this study. STUDY DESIGN:: A two-stage approach is employed. First, a Malmquist model is specified to calculate hospital-level productivity measures. A logistic regression model is then estimated to compare the three HIT adoption strategies' relative performance on the newly constructed productivity measures. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:: The HIT vendor selection strategy impacts the amount of technological change required of an organization but does not appear to have either a positive or adverse impact on technical efficiency or total factor productivity. CONCLUSIONS:: The higher levels in technological change experienced by hospitals using the best of breed and best of suite HIT vendor selection strategies may have a more direct impact on the organization early on in the process. However, these gains did not appear to translate into either increased technical efficiency or total factor productivity during the period studied. Over a longer period, one HIT vendor selection strategy may yet prove to be more effective at improving efficiency and productivity.

AB - OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to compare health information technology (HIT) adoption strategies' relative performance on hospital-level productivity measures. DATA SOURCES:: The American Hospital Association's Annual Survey and Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Analytics for fiscal years 2002 through 2007 were used for this study. STUDY DESIGN:: A two-stage approach is employed. First, a Malmquist model is specified to calculate hospital-level productivity measures. A logistic regression model is then estimated to compare the three HIT adoption strategies' relative performance on the newly constructed productivity measures. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:: The HIT vendor selection strategy impacts the amount of technological change required of an organization but does not appear to have either a positive or adverse impact on technical efficiency or total factor productivity. CONCLUSIONS:: The higher levels in technological change experienced by hospitals using the best of breed and best of suite HIT vendor selection strategies may have a more direct impact on the organization early on in the process. However, these gains did not appear to translate into either increased technical efficiency or total factor productivity during the period studied. Over a longer period, one HIT vendor selection strategy may yet prove to be more effective at improving efficiency and productivity.

KW - data envelopment analyses

KW - health information technology

KW - productivity

KW - vendor selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880232430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880232430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182572c7b

DO - 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182572c7b

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 177

EP - 187

JO - Health Care Management Review

JF - Health Care Management Review

SN - 0361-6274

IS - 3

ER -