Health literacy in an adult dental research population

A pilot study

Richard Jackson, George J. Eckert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to gather data concerning the level of health literacy in adults who frequently volunteer for our clinical research programs. Methods: A convenience sample of 99 adults was recruited from our database of subjects taking part in an ongoing series of investigations. Health literacy was measured using the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA). Additional demographic and socioeconomic data were collected by means of a questionnaire. Results: The results indicated that 13 percent of the cohort of subjects scored in the "inadequate" or "marginal" categories as described by the criteria of the S-TOFHLA. Inadequate or marginal health literacy was associated with race, gender, and age. Unfortunately, the sample size was too small to determine the interaction of these variables. Conclusions: Dental faculty conducting clinical research investigations should be cognizant of the fact that a portion of adults, especially older adults, may have difficulty reading written instructions, informational letters of consent, prescriptions, and other documents. Researchers should make every effort to ensure that information provided in text form is provided in a manner that is easily understandable to the reader. Technical terminology and jargon should be avoided or if used, it should be explained in plain, simple language. If a potential subject is having difficulty, the investigator is obligated to take the additional time to educate the potential subject using alternative methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)196-200
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Public Health Dentistry
Volume68
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2008

Fingerprint

Dental Research
Health Literacy
Population
Dental Faculties
Research Personnel
Research
Terminology
Sample Size
Health Status
Prescriptions
Reading
Volunteers
Language
Demography
Databases

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Assessment
  • Health literacy
  • Informed consent statements
  • Literacy
  • S-TOFHLA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Health literacy in an adult dental research population : A pilot study. / Jackson, Richard; Eckert, George J.

In: Journal of Public Health Dentistry, Vol. 68, No. 4, 01.09.2008, p. 196-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6330a8986e964e239d2506f8d215473e,
title = "Health literacy in an adult dental research population: A pilot study",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to gather data concerning the level of health literacy in adults who frequently volunteer for our clinical research programs. Methods: A convenience sample of 99 adults was recruited from our database of subjects taking part in an ongoing series of investigations. Health literacy was measured using the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA). Additional demographic and socioeconomic data were collected by means of a questionnaire. Results: The results indicated that 13 percent of the cohort of subjects scored in the {"}inadequate{"} or {"}marginal{"} categories as described by the criteria of the S-TOFHLA. Inadequate or marginal health literacy was associated with race, gender, and age. Unfortunately, the sample size was too small to determine the interaction of these variables. Conclusions: Dental faculty conducting clinical research investigations should be cognizant of the fact that a portion of adults, especially older adults, may have difficulty reading written instructions, informational letters of consent, prescriptions, and other documents. Researchers should make every effort to ensure that information provided in text form is provided in a manner that is easily understandable to the reader. Technical terminology and jargon should be avoided or if used, it should be explained in plain, simple language. If a potential subject is having difficulty, the investigator is obligated to take the additional time to educate the potential subject using alternative methods.",
keywords = "Adult, Assessment, Health literacy, Informed consent statements, Literacy, S-TOFHLA",
author = "Richard Jackson and Eckert, {George J.}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1752-7325.2007.00063.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "196--200",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Dentistry",
issn = "0022-4006",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health literacy in an adult dental research population

T2 - A pilot study

AU - Jackson, Richard

AU - Eckert, George J.

PY - 2008/9/1

Y1 - 2008/9/1

N2 - Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to gather data concerning the level of health literacy in adults who frequently volunteer for our clinical research programs. Methods: A convenience sample of 99 adults was recruited from our database of subjects taking part in an ongoing series of investigations. Health literacy was measured using the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA). Additional demographic and socioeconomic data were collected by means of a questionnaire. Results: The results indicated that 13 percent of the cohort of subjects scored in the "inadequate" or "marginal" categories as described by the criteria of the S-TOFHLA. Inadequate or marginal health literacy was associated with race, gender, and age. Unfortunately, the sample size was too small to determine the interaction of these variables. Conclusions: Dental faculty conducting clinical research investigations should be cognizant of the fact that a portion of adults, especially older adults, may have difficulty reading written instructions, informational letters of consent, prescriptions, and other documents. Researchers should make every effort to ensure that information provided in text form is provided in a manner that is easily understandable to the reader. Technical terminology and jargon should be avoided or if used, it should be explained in plain, simple language. If a potential subject is having difficulty, the investigator is obligated to take the additional time to educate the potential subject using alternative methods.

AB - Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to gather data concerning the level of health literacy in adults who frequently volunteer for our clinical research programs. Methods: A convenience sample of 99 adults was recruited from our database of subjects taking part in an ongoing series of investigations. Health literacy was measured using the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA). Additional demographic and socioeconomic data were collected by means of a questionnaire. Results: The results indicated that 13 percent of the cohort of subjects scored in the "inadequate" or "marginal" categories as described by the criteria of the S-TOFHLA. Inadequate or marginal health literacy was associated with race, gender, and age. Unfortunately, the sample size was too small to determine the interaction of these variables. Conclusions: Dental faculty conducting clinical research investigations should be cognizant of the fact that a portion of adults, especially older adults, may have difficulty reading written instructions, informational letters of consent, prescriptions, and other documents. Researchers should make every effort to ensure that information provided in text form is provided in a manner that is easily understandable to the reader. Technical terminology and jargon should be avoided or if used, it should be explained in plain, simple language. If a potential subject is having difficulty, the investigator is obligated to take the additional time to educate the potential subject using alternative methods.

KW - Adult

KW - Assessment

KW - Health literacy

KW - Informed consent statements

KW - Literacy

KW - S-TOFHLA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57349192115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57349192115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2007.00063.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2007.00063.x

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 196

EP - 200

JO - Journal of Public Health Dentistry

JF - Journal of Public Health Dentistry

SN - 0022-4006

IS - 4

ER -