Health risk influence on medical care costs and utilization among 2,898 municipal employees

Michael T. Weaver, Brian G. Forrester, Kathleen C. Brown, Jennan A. Phillips, James C. Hilyer, Eli I. Capilouto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Although worksite health promotion programs are credited with stabilizing medical benefits costs, research is needed to characterize the medical costs of cohorts with selected health risk factors. The purpose of this study was to compare medical cost outcomes in City of Birmingham, Alabama, employees who differ on selected health risk factors. Methods: Health risk appraisal and medical claims cost data were examined in 2,898 employees participating in health screening during 1992 and 1993. Probit analysis was employed to test the null hypotheses that there are no differences in (1) probability of medical service utilization and (2) probability of medical service cost quartile (high, moderate, and low) between groups characterized by risks. Age, gender, race, education, marital status, and diabetes were included as covariates in each model examined. In addition, smoking habits was included as a covariate in models involving risk taking behavior and psychosocial risk. Results: Significant differences in medical care utilization and costs were found between risk groups based on psychosocial risk, cardiovascular disease risk, and total risk. No association was found between risk-taking behavior and utilization and costs. Conclusion. Subjects reporting psychosocial, cardiovascular disease, and total risk factors were more likely to use medical services and to be in the high or high/moderate cost categories.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)250-253
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Care Costs
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health
Risk-Taking
Cardiovascular Diseases
Health Status Indicators
Marital Status
Health Promotion
Workplace
Habits
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Smoking
Education
Research

Keywords

  • Costs and cost analysis
  • Health promotion
  • Occupational health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Weaver, M. T., Forrester, B. G., Brown, K. C., Phillips, J. A., Hilyer, J. C., & Capilouto, E. I. (1998). Health risk influence on medical care costs and utilization among 2,898 municipal employees. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 15(3), 250-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00073-7

Health risk influence on medical care costs and utilization among 2,898 municipal employees. / Weaver, Michael T.; Forrester, Brian G.; Brown, Kathleen C.; Phillips, Jennan A.; Hilyer, James C.; Capilouto, Eli I.

In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 3, 10.1998, p. 250-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weaver, MT, Forrester, BG, Brown, KC, Phillips, JA, Hilyer, JC & Capilouto, EI 1998, 'Health risk influence on medical care costs and utilization among 2,898 municipal employees', American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 250-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00073-7
Weaver, Michael T. ; Forrester, Brian G. ; Brown, Kathleen C. ; Phillips, Jennan A. ; Hilyer, James C. ; Capilouto, Eli I. / Health risk influence on medical care costs and utilization among 2,898 municipal employees. In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1998 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 250-253.
@article{87f01e122ec64e539008f8b8178b8d3c,
title = "Health risk influence on medical care costs and utilization among 2,898 municipal employees",
abstract = "Introduction: Although worksite health promotion programs are credited with stabilizing medical benefits costs, research is needed to characterize the medical costs of cohorts with selected health risk factors. The purpose of this study was to compare medical cost outcomes in City of Birmingham, Alabama, employees who differ on selected health risk factors. Methods: Health risk appraisal and medical claims cost data were examined in 2,898 employees participating in health screening during 1992 and 1993. Probit analysis was employed to test the null hypotheses that there are no differences in (1) probability of medical service utilization and (2) probability of medical service cost quartile (high, moderate, and low) between groups characterized by risks. Age, gender, race, education, marital status, and diabetes were included as covariates in each model examined. In addition, smoking habits was included as a covariate in models involving risk taking behavior and psychosocial risk. Results: Significant differences in medical care utilization and costs were found between risk groups based on psychosocial risk, cardiovascular disease risk, and total risk. No association was found between risk-taking behavior and utilization and costs. Conclusion. Subjects reporting psychosocial, cardiovascular disease, and total risk factors were more likely to use medical services and to be in the high or high/moderate cost categories.",
keywords = "Costs and cost analysis, Health promotion, Occupational health",
author = "Weaver, {Michael T.} and Forrester, {Brian G.} and Brown, {Kathleen C.} and Phillips, {Jennan A.} and Hilyer, {James C.} and Capilouto, {Eli I.}",
year = "1998",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00073-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "250--253",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health risk influence on medical care costs and utilization among 2,898 municipal employees

AU - Weaver, Michael T.

AU - Forrester, Brian G.

AU - Brown, Kathleen C.

AU - Phillips, Jennan A.

AU - Hilyer, James C.

AU - Capilouto, Eli I.

PY - 1998/10

Y1 - 1998/10

N2 - Introduction: Although worksite health promotion programs are credited with stabilizing medical benefits costs, research is needed to characterize the medical costs of cohorts with selected health risk factors. The purpose of this study was to compare medical cost outcomes in City of Birmingham, Alabama, employees who differ on selected health risk factors. Methods: Health risk appraisal and medical claims cost data were examined in 2,898 employees participating in health screening during 1992 and 1993. Probit analysis was employed to test the null hypotheses that there are no differences in (1) probability of medical service utilization and (2) probability of medical service cost quartile (high, moderate, and low) between groups characterized by risks. Age, gender, race, education, marital status, and diabetes were included as covariates in each model examined. In addition, smoking habits was included as a covariate in models involving risk taking behavior and psychosocial risk. Results: Significant differences in medical care utilization and costs were found between risk groups based on psychosocial risk, cardiovascular disease risk, and total risk. No association was found between risk-taking behavior and utilization and costs. Conclusion. Subjects reporting psychosocial, cardiovascular disease, and total risk factors were more likely to use medical services and to be in the high or high/moderate cost categories.

AB - Introduction: Although worksite health promotion programs are credited with stabilizing medical benefits costs, research is needed to characterize the medical costs of cohorts with selected health risk factors. The purpose of this study was to compare medical cost outcomes in City of Birmingham, Alabama, employees who differ on selected health risk factors. Methods: Health risk appraisal and medical claims cost data were examined in 2,898 employees participating in health screening during 1992 and 1993. Probit analysis was employed to test the null hypotheses that there are no differences in (1) probability of medical service utilization and (2) probability of medical service cost quartile (high, moderate, and low) between groups characterized by risks. Age, gender, race, education, marital status, and diabetes were included as covariates in each model examined. In addition, smoking habits was included as a covariate in models involving risk taking behavior and psychosocial risk. Results: Significant differences in medical care utilization and costs were found between risk groups based on psychosocial risk, cardiovascular disease risk, and total risk. No association was found between risk-taking behavior and utilization and costs. Conclusion. Subjects reporting psychosocial, cardiovascular disease, and total risk factors were more likely to use medical services and to be in the high or high/moderate cost categories.

KW - Costs and cost analysis

KW - Health promotion

KW - Occupational health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031663651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031663651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00073-7

DO - 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00073-7

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 250

EP - 253

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

IS - 3

ER -