Helping medical school faculty realize their dreams: An innovative, collaborative mentoring program

Linda H. Pololi, Sharon M. Knight, Kay Dennis, Richard Frankel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

154 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Junior faculty wishing to achieve successful careers in academic medicine face many challenges. To facilitate faculty in their career development, the authors implemented and evaluated an innovative collaborative, or peer-group, mentoring program at their medical school. Based on Rogerian and adult learning principles, the program incorporated development of skills in key areas for career development, a structured values-based approach to career planning, and instruction in scholarly writing. The 80-hour program has so far been conducted twice over two academic years (1999-2001) with 18 faculty (50% women). Quantitative and qualitative methods were used in the evaluation. Program attendance was 89%. All participants completed a written academic development plan, an exercise they rated as valuable. They also completed an average of one to three manuscripts for publication. Evaluation data highlighted the critical nature of a supportive learning environment and the reasons participants chose to attend the program consistently. Key meaningful outcomes for most participants were: (1) identification of their core values; (2) a structured process of short- and long-term career planning based on these core values; (3) the development of close, collaborative relationships; (4) development of skills in such areas as gender and power issues, negotiation and conflict management, scholarly writing, and oral presentation, and (5) improved satisfaction linked to participants' decisions to remain in academic medicine. Participants developed a sense of personal transformation and empowerment. The authors conclude that collaborative mentoring offers a new approach to faculty development that addresses limitations of traditional approaches in a satisfying and cost-effective way.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)377-384
Number of pages8
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume77
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medical Faculties
Medical Schools
mentoring
school
career planning
Medicine
Learning
Peer Group
career
Manuscripts
Negotiating
Interpersonal Relations
Publications
medicine
Values
Exercise
conflict management
Costs and Cost Analysis
peer group
Mentoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Education

Cite this

Helping medical school faculty realize their dreams : An innovative, collaborative mentoring program. / Pololi, Linda H.; Knight, Sharon M.; Dennis, Kay; Frankel, Richard.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 77, No. 5, 2002, p. 377-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pololi, Linda H. ; Knight, Sharon M. ; Dennis, Kay ; Frankel, Richard. / Helping medical school faculty realize their dreams : An innovative, collaborative mentoring program. In: Academic Medicine. 2002 ; Vol. 77, No. 5. pp. 377-384.
@article{dba612e1828f4eb6bc97573dbbe33858,
title = "Helping medical school faculty realize their dreams: An innovative, collaborative mentoring program",
abstract = "Junior faculty wishing to achieve successful careers in academic medicine face many challenges. To facilitate faculty in their career development, the authors implemented and evaluated an innovative collaborative, or peer-group, mentoring program at their medical school. Based on Rogerian and adult learning principles, the program incorporated development of skills in key areas for career development, a structured values-based approach to career planning, and instruction in scholarly writing. The 80-hour program has so far been conducted twice over two academic years (1999-2001) with 18 faculty (50{\%} women). Quantitative and qualitative methods were used in the evaluation. Program attendance was 89{\%}. All participants completed a written academic development plan, an exercise they rated as valuable. They also completed an average of one to three manuscripts for publication. Evaluation data highlighted the critical nature of a supportive learning environment and the reasons participants chose to attend the program consistently. Key meaningful outcomes for most participants were: (1) identification of their core values; (2) a structured process of short- and long-term career planning based on these core values; (3) the development of close, collaborative relationships; (4) development of skills in such areas as gender and power issues, negotiation and conflict management, scholarly writing, and oral presentation, and (5) improved satisfaction linked to participants' decisions to remain in academic medicine. Participants developed a sense of personal transformation and empowerment. The authors conclude that collaborative mentoring offers a new approach to faculty development that addresses limitations of traditional approaches in a satisfying and cost-effective way.",
author = "Pololi, {Linda H.} and Knight, {Sharon M.} and Kay Dennis and Richard Frankel",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "377--384",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Helping medical school faculty realize their dreams

T2 - An innovative, collaborative mentoring program

AU - Pololi, Linda H.

AU - Knight, Sharon M.

AU - Dennis, Kay

AU - Frankel, Richard

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Junior faculty wishing to achieve successful careers in academic medicine face many challenges. To facilitate faculty in their career development, the authors implemented and evaluated an innovative collaborative, or peer-group, mentoring program at their medical school. Based on Rogerian and adult learning principles, the program incorporated development of skills in key areas for career development, a structured values-based approach to career planning, and instruction in scholarly writing. The 80-hour program has so far been conducted twice over two academic years (1999-2001) with 18 faculty (50% women). Quantitative and qualitative methods were used in the evaluation. Program attendance was 89%. All participants completed a written academic development plan, an exercise they rated as valuable. They also completed an average of one to three manuscripts for publication. Evaluation data highlighted the critical nature of a supportive learning environment and the reasons participants chose to attend the program consistently. Key meaningful outcomes for most participants were: (1) identification of their core values; (2) a structured process of short- and long-term career planning based on these core values; (3) the development of close, collaborative relationships; (4) development of skills in such areas as gender and power issues, negotiation and conflict management, scholarly writing, and oral presentation, and (5) improved satisfaction linked to participants' decisions to remain in academic medicine. Participants developed a sense of personal transformation and empowerment. The authors conclude that collaborative mentoring offers a new approach to faculty development that addresses limitations of traditional approaches in a satisfying and cost-effective way.

AB - Junior faculty wishing to achieve successful careers in academic medicine face many challenges. To facilitate faculty in their career development, the authors implemented and evaluated an innovative collaborative, or peer-group, mentoring program at their medical school. Based on Rogerian and adult learning principles, the program incorporated development of skills in key areas for career development, a structured values-based approach to career planning, and instruction in scholarly writing. The 80-hour program has so far been conducted twice over two academic years (1999-2001) with 18 faculty (50% women). Quantitative and qualitative methods were used in the evaluation. Program attendance was 89%. All participants completed a written academic development plan, an exercise they rated as valuable. They also completed an average of one to three manuscripts for publication. Evaluation data highlighted the critical nature of a supportive learning environment and the reasons participants chose to attend the program consistently. Key meaningful outcomes for most participants were: (1) identification of their core values; (2) a structured process of short- and long-term career planning based on these core values; (3) the development of close, collaborative relationships; (4) development of skills in such areas as gender and power issues, negotiation and conflict management, scholarly writing, and oral presentation, and (5) improved satisfaction linked to participants' decisions to remain in academic medicine. Participants developed a sense of personal transformation and empowerment. The authors conclude that collaborative mentoring offers a new approach to faculty development that addresses limitations of traditional approaches in a satisfying and cost-effective way.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036093376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036093376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12010691

AN - SCOPUS:0036093376

VL - 77

SP - 377

EP - 384

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 5

ER -