High and low-risk specialties experience with the U.S. medical malpractice system

Aaron Carroll, Jennifer L. Buddenbaum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: "High-liability risk specialties" tend to be the focus of medical malpractice system research and debate, but concerns and fears are not limited to this group. The objective of this study was to examine whether "high-liability risk" medical specialties have a different experience with the malpractice system than "low-liability risk" specialties. Methods. We reviewed claims data from the Physician Insurers Association of America's Data Sharing Project between January 1985 and December 2008. We used linear regression, controlling for year, to determine how liability risk affected outcomes of interest. Results: In high-liability risk specialties, 33% of claims result in indemnity payments compared to 28% for low-liability risk specialties (p < 0.001). The average indemnity payment for high-liability risk specialties was $315,314 compared to $267,146 for low-liability risk specialties (p = 0.25). Although only a small percentage of claims go to trial, low-liability risk specialties have significantly more claims that are ultimately dropped, withdrawn or dismissed, while high-liability risk specialties have significantly more claims that result in plaintiff settlement (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Malpractice risk exists for all specialties. Variability in indemnity costs are found in both high- and low-liability risk specialties. Differences in the reasons for which claims are initiated for high- and low-liability risk specialties likely necessitate different risk management solutions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number465
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Malpractice
Insurance
Insurance Carriers
Information Dissemination
Risk Management
Fear
Linear Models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

High and low-risk specialties experience with the U.S. medical malpractice system. / Carroll, Aaron; Buddenbaum, Jennifer L.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, 465, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f84bc9957e0747f094d7db766685b1e1,
title = "High and low-risk specialties experience with the U.S. medical malpractice system",
abstract = "Background: {"}High-liability risk specialties{"} tend to be the focus of medical malpractice system research and debate, but concerns and fears are not limited to this group. The objective of this study was to examine whether {"}high-liability risk{"} medical specialties have a different experience with the malpractice system than {"}low-liability risk{"} specialties. Methods. We reviewed claims data from the Physician Insurers Association of America's Data Sharing Project between January 1985 and December 2008. We used linear regression, controlling for year, to determine how liability risk affected outcomes of interest. Results: In high-liability risk specialties, 33{\%} of claims result in indemnity payments compared to 28{\%} for low-liability risk specialties (p < 0.001). The average indemnity payment for high-liability risk specialties was $315,314 compared to $267,146 for low-liability risk specialties (p = 0.25). Although only a small percentage of claims go to trial, low-liability risk specialties have significantly more claims that are ultimately dropped, withdrawn or dismissed, while high-liability risk specialties have significantly more claims that result in plaintiff settlement (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Malpractice risk exists for all specialties. Variability in indemnity costs are found in both high- and low-liability risk specialties. Differences in the reasons for which claims are initiated for high- and low-liability risk specialties likely necessitate different risk management solutions.",
author = "Aaron Carroll and Buddenbaum, {Jennifer L.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6963-13-465",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - High and low-risk specialties experience with the U.S. medical malpractice system

AU - Carroll, Aaron

AU - Buddenbaum, Jennifer L.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Background: "High-liability risk specialties" tend to be the focus of medical malpractice system research and debate, but concerns and fears are not limited to this group. The objective of this study was to examine whether "high-liability risk" medical specialties have a different experience with the malpractice system than "low-liability risk" specialties. Methods. We reviewed claims data from the Physician Insurers Association of America's Data Sharing Project between January 1985 and December 2008. We used linear regression, controlling for year, to determine how liability risk affected outcomes of interest. Results: In high-liability risk specialties, 33% of claims result in indemnity payments compared to 28% for low-liability risk specialties (p < 0.001). The average indemnity payment for high-liability risk specialties was $315,314 compared to $267,146 for low-liability risk specialties (p = 0.25). Although only a small percentage of claims go to trial, low-liability risk specialties have significantly more claims that are ultimately dropped, withdrawn or dismissed, while high-liability risk specialties have significantly more claims that result in plaintiff settlement (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Malpractice risk exists for all specialties. Variability in indemnity costs are found in both high- and low-liability risk specialties. Differences in the reasons for which claims are initiated for high- and low-liability risk specialties likely necessitate different risk management solutions.

AB - Background: "High-liability risk specialties" tend to be the focus of medical malpractice system research and debate, but concerns and fears are not limited to this group. The objective of this study was to examine whether "high-liability risk" medical specialties have a different experience with the malpractice system than "low-liability risk" specialties. Methods. We reviewed claims data from the Physician Insurers Association of America's Data Sharing Project between January 1985 and December 2008. We used linear regression, controlling for year, to determine how liability risk affected outcomes of interest. Results: In high-liability risk specialties, 33% of claims result in indemnity payments compared to 28% for low-liability risk specialties (p < 0.001). The average indemnity payment for high-liability risk specialties was $315,314 compared to $267,146 for low-liability risk specialties (p = 0.25). Although only a small percentage of claims go to trial, low-liability risk specialties have significantly more claims that are ultimately dropped, withdrawn or dismissed, while high-liability risk specialties have significantly more claims that result in plaintiff settlement (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Malpractice risk exists for all specialties. Variability in indemnity costs are found in both high- and low-liability risk specialties. Differences in the reasons for which claims are initiated for high- and low-liability risk specialties likely necessitate different risk management solutions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887051709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887051709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6963-13-465

DO - 10.1186/1472-6963-13-465

M3 - Article

C2 - 24192524

AN - SCOPUS:84887051709

VL - 13

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

IS - 1

M1 - 465

ER -