High Turnover among State Health Officials/Public Health Directors: Implications for the Public's Health

Paul Halverson, John R. Lumpkin, Valerie Yeager, Brian C. Castrucci, Sharon Moffatt, Hugh Tilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: State health officials (SHOs) serve a critical role as the leaders of state public health systems. Despite their many responsibilities, there is no formal process for preparation to become an SHO, and few requirements influence the selection of an SHO. Furthermore, to date, no studies have examined SHO tenure or their experiences. Objective: This study examines SHO tenure over time and the relationship between SHO tenure and organizational and state attributes. Design: This longitudinal study employed primary data on SHOs and secondary data from the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials on organizational attributes of state public health agencies. Setting: This study examines SHOs within the United States. Participants: SHOs who served in years 1980-2017. Main Outcome Measures: Annual average SHO tenure; average SHO tenure by state. Results: In the 38 years of this study, 508 individuals served as SHOs in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The average tenure over this period was 4.1 years, with a median tenure of 2.9 years. During the study period, almost 20% of SHOs served terms of 1 year or less. A total of 32 SHOs (32/508 or 6.3%) served for 10 years or longer. Excluding SHOs who served 10 years or longer (n = 32 SHOs who had a collective 478 years of tenure) reduces the average term in office to 3.5 years. The average number of new SHOs per year is 12.3. SHOs appointed by a board of health averaged more than 8 years in office compared with averages just under 4 years for those appointed by governors or secretaries of state agencies. Conclusions: There are notable differences in SHO tenure across states. Future research is needed to further examine SHO tenure, effectiveness, job satisfaction, transitions, and the relationship between SHOs and state health. It may be valuable to expand on opportunities for new SHOs to learn from peers who have moderate to long tenures as well as SHO alumni. Given that average SHO tenure is approximately 4 years and that an SHO could be thrust into the national spotlight at a moment's notice, governors may want to consider experience over partisanship as they appoint new SHOs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)537-542
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Public Health
Health
Job Satisfaction

Keywords

  • leadership
  • public health
  • state health official
  • tenure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

High Turnover among State Health Officials/Public Health Directors : Implications for the Public's Health. / Halverson, Paul; Lumpkin, John R.; Yeager, Valerie; Castrucci, Brian C.; Moffatt, Sharon; Tilson, Hugh.

In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Vol. 23, No. 5, 01.01.2017, p. 537-542.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1d5ba98df6254cfb8ae196b7f1199b15,
title = "High Turnover among State Health Officials/Public Health Directors: Implications for the Public's Health",
abstract = "Context: State health officials (SHOs) serve a critical role as the leaders of state public health systems. Despite their many responsibilities, there is no formal process for preparation to become an SHO, and few requirements influence the selection of an SHO. Furthermore, to date, no studies have examined SHO tenure or their experiences. Objective: This study examines SHO tenure over time and the relationship between SHO tenure and organizational and state attributes. Design: This longitudinal study employed primary data on SHOs and secondary data from the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials on organizational attributes of state public health agencies. Setting: This study examines SHOs within the United States. Participants: SHOs who served in years 1980-2017. Main Outcome Measures: Annual average SHO tenure; average SHO tenure by state. Results: In the 38 years of this study, 508 individuals served as SHOs in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The average tenure over this period was 4.1 years, with a median tenure of 2.9 years. During the study period, almost 20{\%} of SHOs served terms of 1 year or less. A total of 32 SHOs (32/508 or 6.3{\%}) served for 10 years or longer. Excluding SHOs who served 10 years or longer (n = 32 SHOs who had a collective 478 years of tenure) reduces the average term in office to 3.5 years. The average number of new SHOs per year is 12.3. SHOs appointed by a board of health averaged more than 8 years in office compared with averages just under 4 years for those appointed by governors or secretaries of state agencies. Conclusions: There are notable differences in SHO tenure across states. Future research is needed to further examine SHO tenure, effectiveness, job satisfaction, transitions, and the relationship between SHOs and state health. It may be valuable to expand on opportunities for new SHOs to learn from peers who have moderate to long tenures as well as SHO alumni. Given that average SHO tenure is approximately 4 years and that an SHO could be thrust into the national spotlight at a moment's notice, governors may want to consider experience over partisanship as they appoint new SHOs.",
keywords = "leadership, public health, state health official, tenure",
author = "Paul Halverson and Lumpkin, {John R.} and Valerie Yeager and Castrucci, {Brian C.} and Sharon Moffatt and Hugh Tilson",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0000000000000639",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "537--542",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - High Turnover among State Health Officials/Public Health Directors

T2 - Implications for the Public's Health

AU - Halverson, Paul

AU - Lumpkin, John R.

AU - Yeager, Valerie

AU - Castrucci, Brian C.

AU - Moffatt, Sharon

AU - Tilson, Hugh

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Context: State health officials (SHOs) serve a critical role as the leaders of state public health systems. Despite their many responsibilities, there is no formal process for preparation to become an SHO, and few requirements influence the selection of an SHO. Furthermore, to date, no studies have examined SHO tenure or their experiences. Objective: This study examines SHO tenure over time and the relationship between SHO tenure and organizational and state attributes. Design: This longitudinal study employed primary data on SHOs and secondary data from the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials on organizational attributes of state public health agencies. Setting: This study examines SHOs within the United States. Participants: SHOs who served in years 1980-2017. Main Outcome Measures: Annual average SHO tenure; average SHO tenure by state. Results: In the 38 years of this study, 508 individuals served as SHOs in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The average tenure over this period was 4.1 years, with a median tenure of 2.9 years. During the study period, almost 20% of SHOs served terms of 1 year or less. A total of 32 SHOs (32/508 or 6.3%) served for 10 years or longer. Excluding SHOs who served 10 years or longer (n = 32 SHOs who had a collective 478 years of tenure) reduces the average term in office to 3.5 years. The average number of new SHOs per year is 12.3. SHOs appointed by a board of health averaged more than 8 years in office compared with averages just under 4 years for those appointed by governors or secretaries of state agencies. Conclusions: There are notable differences in SHO tenure across states. Future research is needed to further examine SHO tenure, effectiveness, job satisfaction, transitions, and the relationship between SHOs and state health. It may be valuable to expand on opportunities for new SHOs to learn from peers who have moderate to long tenures as well as SHO alumni. Given that average SHO tenure is approximately 4 years and that an SHO could be thrust into the national spotlight at a moment's notice, governors may want to consider experience over partisanship as they appoint new SHOs.

AB - Context: State health officials (SHOs) serve a critical role as the leaders of state public health systems. Despite their many responsibilities, there is no formal process for preparation to become an SHO, and few requirements influence the selection of an SHO. Furthermore, to date, no studies have examined SHO tenure or their experiences. Objective: This study examines SHO tenure over time and the relationship between SHO tenure and organizational and state attributes. Design: This longitudinal study employed primary data on SHOs and secondary data from the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials on organizational attributes of state public health agencies. Setting: This study examines SHOs within the United States. Participants: SHOs who served in years 1980-2017. Main Outcome Measures: Annual average SHO tenure; average SHO tenure by state. Results: In the 38 years of this study, 508 individuals served as SHOs in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The average tenure over this period was 4.1 years, with a median tenure of 2.9 years. During the study period, almost 20% of SHOs served terms of 1 year or less. A total of 32 SHOs (32/508 or 6.3%) served for 10 years or longer. Excluding SHOs who served 10 years or longer (n = 32 SHOs who had a collective 478 years of tenure) reduces the average term in office to 3.5 years. The average number of new SHOs per year is 12.3. SHOs appointed by a board of health averaged more than 8 years in office compared with averages just under 4 years for those appointed by governors or secretaries of state agencies. Conclusions: There are notable differences in SHO tenure across states. Future research is needed to further examine SHO tenure, effectiveness, job satisfaction, transitions, and the relationship between SHOs and state health. It may be valuable to expand on opportunities for new SHOs to learn from peers who have moderate to long tenures as well as SHO alumni. Given that average SHO tenure is approximately 4 years and that an SHO could be thrust into the national spotlight at a moment's notice, governors may want to consider experience over partisanship as they appoint new SHOs.

KW - leadership

KW - public health

KW - state health official

KW - tenure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027020025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027020025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000639

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000639

M3 - Article

C2 - 28759557

AN - SCOPUS:85027020025

VL - 23

SP - 537

EP - 542

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

IS - 5

ER -