Histomorphometric evaluation of alveolar bone turnover between the maxilla and the mandible during experimental tooth movement in dogs

Toru Deguchi, Teruko Takano-Yamamoto, Toshinori Yabuuchi, Ryoko Ando, W. Eugene Roberts, Lawrence P. Garetto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to quantify the histomorphometric properties of alveolar bone to identify the characteristics of the changes of quantity and quality of alveolar bone between the maxilla and the mandible during orthodontic tooth movement in dogs. Methods: A force of 200 to 250 g was applied from miniature implants to the premolars for either 4 or 12 weeks. Maxillary and mandibular tooth specimens were embedded and sectioned at 100 μm in the sagittal plane for microscopic examination. Results: Significantly more orthodontic tooth movement was observed for maxillary than for mandibular teeth. The primary histomorphometric analysis indicated that, after 4 weeks of tooth movement, a marginal increase in resorptive parameters was associated with a decrease of bone volume at both the tension and compression sites. On the other hand, after 12 weeks of tooth movement, secondary histomorphometric analysis indicated an increase in the bone formation rate, resulting in increased woven bone formation, especially at the tension sites. Conclusions: Clinically, maxillary and mandibular bone responds differently to orthodontic force, resulting in a significant difference in the amounts of tooth movement. Significant differences in the primary and secondary histomorphometric indexes between the jaws and at the different time points during orthodontic tooth movement might affect the amount and rate of tooth movement in orthodontic patients. Moreover, orthodontic tooth movement is characterized by a regional acceleratory phenomenon, manifested as increased bone turnover in the alveolar process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)889-897
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume133
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tooth Movement Techniques
Bone Remodeling
Maxilla
Mandible
Dogs
Osteogenesis
Bone and Bones
Tooth
Alveolar Process
Bicuspid
Orthodontics
Jaw

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Surgery

Cite this

Histomorphometric evaluation of alveolar bone turnover between the maxilla and the mandible during experimental tooth movement in dogs. / Deguchi, Toru; Takano-Yamamoto, Teruko; Yabuuchi, Toshinori; Ando, Ryoko; Roberts, W. Eugene; Garetto, Lawrence P.

In: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Vol. 133, No. 6, 06.2008, p. 889-897.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deguchi, Toru ; Takano-Yamamoto, Teruko ; Yabuuchi, Toshinori ; Ando, Ryoko ; Roberts, W. Eugene ; Garetto, Lawrence P. / Histomorphometric evaluation of alveolar bone turnover between the maxilla and the mandible during experimental tooth movement in dogs. In: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2008 ; Vol. 133, No. 6. pp. 889-897.
@article{cf2d6b5445734648b7ec3ffbfeb5eb80,
title = "Histomorphometric evaluation of alveolar bone turnover between the maxilla and the mandible during experimental tooth movement in dogs",
abstract = "Introduction: The purpose of this study was to quantify the histomorphometric properties of alveolar bone to identify the characteristics of the changes of quantity and quality of alveolar bone between the maxilla and the mandible during orthodontic tooth movement in dogs. Methods: A force of 200 to 250 g was applied from miniature implants to the premolars for either 4 or 12 weeks. Maxillary and mandibular tooth specimens were embedded and sectioned at 100 μm in the sagittal plane for microscopic examination. Results: Significantly more orthodontic tooth movement was observed for maxillary than for mandibular teeth. The primary histomorphometric analysis indicated that, after 4 weeks of tooth movement, a marginal increase in resorptive parameters was associated with a decrease of bone volume at both the tension and compression sites. On the other hand, after 12 weeks of tooth movement, secondary histomorphometric analysis indicated an increase in the bone formation rate, resulting in increased woven bone formation, especially at the tension sites. Conclusions: Clinically, maxillary and mandibular bone responds differently to orthodontic force, resulting in a significant difference in the amounts of tooth movement. Significant differences in the primary and secondary histomorphometric indexes between the jaws and at the different time points during orthodontic tooth movement might affect the amount and rate of tooth movement in orthodontic patients. Moreover, orthodontic tooth movement is characterized by a regional acceleratory phenomenon, manifested as increased bone turnover in the alveolar process.",
author = "Toru Deguchi and Teruko Takano-Yamamoto and Toshinori Yabuuchi and Ryoko Ando and Roberts, {W. Eugene} and Garetto, {Lawrence P.}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "133",
pages = "889--897",
journal = "American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics",
issn = "0889-5406",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Histomorphometric evaluation of alveolar bone turnover between the maxilla and the mandible during experimental tooth movement in dogs

AU - Deguchi, Toru

AU - Takano-Yamamoto, Teruko

AU - Yabuuchi, Toshinori

AU - Ando, Ryoko

AU - Roberts, W. Eugene

AU - Garetto, Lawrence P.

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Introduction: The purpose of this study was to quantify the histomorphometric properties of alveolar bone to identify the characteristics of the changes of quantity and quality of alveolar bone between the maxilla and the mandible during orthodontic tooth movement in dogs. Methods: A force of 200 to 250 g was applied from miniature implants to the premolars for either 4 or 12 weeks. Maxillary and mandibular tooth specimens were embedded and sectioned at 100 μm in the sagittal plane for microscopic examination. Results: Significantly more orthodontic tooth movement was observed for maxillary than for mandibular teeth. The primary histomorphometric analysis indicated that, after 4 weeks of tooth movement, a marginal increase in resorptive parameters was associated with a decrease of bone volume at both the tension and compression sites. On the other hand, after 12 weeks of tooth movement, secondary histomorphometric analysis indicated an increase in the bone formation rate, resulting in increased woven bone formation, especially at the tension sites. Conclusions: Clinically, maxillary and mandibular bone responds differently to orthodontic force, resulting in a significant difference in the amounts of tooth movement. Significant differences in the primary and secondary histomorphometric indexes between the jaws and at the different time points during orthodontic tooth movement might affect the amount and rate of tooth movement in orthodontic patients. Moreover, orthodontic tooth movement is characterized by a regional acceleratory phenomenon, manifested as increased bone turnover in the alveolar process.

AB - Introduction: The purpose of this study was to quantify the histomorphometric properties of alveolar bone to identify the characteristics of the changes of quantity and quality of alveolar bone between the maxilla and the mandible during orthodontic tooth movement in dogs. Methods: A force of 200 to 250 g was applied from miniature implants to the premolars for either 4 or 12 weeks. Maxillary and mandibular tooth specimens were embedded and sectioned at 100 μm in the sagittal plane for microscopic examination. Results: Significantly more orthodontic tooth movement was observed for maxillary than for mandibular teeth. The primary histomorphometric analysis indicated that, after 4 weeks of tooth movement, a marginal increase in resorptive parameters was associated with a decrease of bone volume at both the tension and compression sites. On the other hand, after 12 weeks of tooth movement, secondary histomorphometric analysis indicated an increase in the bone formation rate, resulting in increased woven bone formation, especially at the tension sites. Conclusions: Clinically, maxillary and mandibular bone responds differently to orthodontic force, resulting in a significant difference in the amounts of tooth movement. Significant differences in the primary and secondary histomorphometric indexes between the jaws and at the different time points during orthodontic tooth movement might affect the amount and rate of tooth movement in orthodontic patients. Moreover, orthodontic tooth movement is characterized by a regional acceleratory phenomenon, manifested as increased bone turnover in the alveolar process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44449129502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44449129502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.013

DO - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.013

M3 - Article

VL - 133

SP - 889

EP - 897

JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SN - 0889-5406

IS - 6

ER -