HIV, Trauma, and Infection Control: Universal Precautions Are Universally Ignored

Jeffrey S. Hammond, Jeanne M. Eckes, Gerardo A. Gomez, Dianne N. Cunningham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The medical, legal, and ethical problems associated with routine HIV screening have led to the recommendation that all patients should be presumed to be seropositive and thus protective measures should be taken by all health care workers. This philosophy, termed “universal precautions,” has been difficult to adhere to or enforce, however. Nevertheless, in some trauma population subsets, the prevalence of HIV seropositivity runs as high as 19%, and thus presents an occupational hazard to the trauma health care worker. The mainstays of universal precautions (UP) are barrier techniques against body fluid contact and protection from inadvertent needlestick. To judge compliance with a strict UP protocol, surgical residents engaged in trauma room resuscitations were observed on a random basis by trauma nurse coordinators. Previously, UP had been discussed in conferences and by memo. Over 2 months, 81 trauma rooms were observed, involving 18 house officers. N Overall, there was only 16% compliance with strict UP. The most common protocol variations involved sharps technique. While glove use was nearly universal, protective eye wear, ankle and foot protection, and body protection such as gowns or aprons were commonly ignored. Even in the presence of invasive procedures such as endotracheal intubation or insertion of chest tubes, compliance was less than 40%. The reasons most commonly given by house officers for the lapse in UP were not knowing the protocol, forgetting the protocol, or not having time to implement the protocol. Even for the nine patients residents identified as suspected of being in a high-risk category, UP was strictly adhered to only once. Compliance with universal precautions is difficult to achieve under the best of circumstances. It cannot be assumed that passive informational measures can achieve this goal. Active infection control surveillance and ongoing housestaff inservice are required to minimize the risk of inadvertent injury or contamination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)555-561
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume30
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Universal Precautions
Infection Control
HIV Infections
Wounds and Injuries
HIV Seropositivity
Needlestick Injuries
Delivery of Health Care
Chest Tubes
Intratracheal Intubation
Body Fluids
Ankle
Resuscitation
Compliance
Foot
Nurses
HIV

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Hammond, J. S., Eckes, J. M., Gomez, G. A., & Cunningham, D. N. (1990). HIV, Trauma, and Infection Control: Universal Precautions Are Universally Ignored. Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 30(5), 555-561.

HIV, Trauma, and Infection Control : Universal Precautions Are Universally Ignored. / Hammond, Jeffrey S.; Eckes, Jeanne M.; Gomez, Gerardo A.; Cunningham, Dianne N.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 30, No. 5, 1990, p. 555-561.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hammond, JS, Eckes, JM, Gomez, GA & Cunningham, DN 1990, 'HIV, Trauma, and Infection Control: Universal Precautions Are Universally Ignored', Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 555-561.
Hammond, Jeffrey S. ; Eckes, Jeanne M. ; Gomez, Gerardo A. ; Cunningham, Dianne N. / HIV, Trauma, and Infection Control : Universal Precautions Are Universally Ignored. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 1990 ; Vol. 30, No. 5. pp. 555-561.
@article{3e81442d8c4b4646bdd77a106aed4614,
title = "HIV, Trauma, and Infection Control: Universal Precautions Are Universally Ignored",
abstract = "The medical, legal, and ethical problems associated with routine HIV screening have led to the recommendation that all patients should be presumed to be seropositive and thus protective measures should be taken by all health care workers. This philosophy, termed “universal precautions,” has been difficult to adhere to or enforce, however. Nevertheless, in some trauma population subsets, the prevalence of HIV seropositivity runs as high as 19{\%}, and thus presents an occupational hazard to the trauma health care worker. The mainstays of universal precautions (UP) are barrier techniques against body fluid contact and protection from inadvertent needlestick. To judge compliance with a strict UP protocol, surgical residents engaged in trauma room resuscitations were observed on a random basis by trauma nurse coordinators. Previously, UP had been discussed in conferences and by memo. Over 2 months, 81 trauma rooms were observed, involving 18 house officers. N Overall, there was only 16{\%} compliance with strict UP. The most common protocol variations involved sharps technique. While glove use was nearly universal, protective eye wear, ankle and foot protection, and body protection such as gowns or aprons were commonly ignored. Even in the presence of invasive procedures such as endotracheal intubation or insertion of chest tubes, compliance was less than 40{\%}. The reasons most commonly given by house officers for the lapse in UP were not knowing the protocol, forgetting the protocol, or not having time to implement the protocol. Even for the nine patients residents identified as suspected of being in a high-risk category, UP was strictly adhered to only once. Compliance with universal precautions is difficult to achieve under the best of circumstances. It cannot be assumed that passive informational measures can achieve this goal. Active infection control surveillance and ongoing housestaff inservice are required to minimize the risk of inadvertent injury or contamination.",
author = "Hammond, {Jeffrey S.} and Eckes, {Jeanne M.} and Gomez, {Gerardo A.} and Cunningham, {Dianne N.}",
year = "1990",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "555--561",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - HIV, Trauma, and Infection Control

T2 - Universal Precautions Are Universally Ignored

AU - Hammond, Jeffrey S.

AU - Eckes, Jeanne M.

AU - Gomez, Gerardo A.

AU - Cunningham, Dianne N.

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - The medical, legal, and ethical problems associated with routine HIV screening have led to the recommendation that all patients should be presumed to be seropositive and thus protective measures should be taken by all health care workers. This philosophy, termed “universal precautions,” has been difficult to adhere to or enforce, however. Nevertheless, in some trauma population subsets, the prevalence of HIV seropositivity runs as high as 19%, and thus presents an occupational hazard to the trauma health care worker. The mainstays of universal precautions (UP) are barrier techniques against body fluid contact and protection from inadvertent needlestick. To judge compliance with a strict UP protocol, surgical residents engaged in trauma room resuscitations were observed on a random basis by trauma nurse coordinators. Previously, UP had been discussed in conferences and by memo. Over 2 months, 81 trauma rooms were observed, involving 18 house officers. N Overall, there was only 16% compliance with strict UP. The most common protocol variations involved sharps technique. While glove use was nearly universal, protective eye wear, ankle and foot protection, and body protection such as gowns or aprons were commonly ignored. Even in the presence of invasive procedures such as endotracheal intubation or insertion of chest tubes, compliance was less than 40%. The reasons most commonly given by house officers for the lapse in UP were not knowing the protocol, forgetting the protocol, or not having time to implement the protocol. Even for the nine patients residents identified as suspected of being in a high-risk category, UP was strictly adhered to only once. Compliance with universal precautions is difficult to achieve under the best of circumstances. It cannot be assumed that passive informational measures can achieve this goal. Active infection control surveillance and ongoing housestaff inservice are required to minimize the risk of inadvertent injury or contamination.

AB - The medical, legal, and ethical problems associated with routine HIV screening have led to the recommendation that all patients should be presumed to be seropositive and thus protective measures should be taken by all health care workers. This philosophy, termed “universal precautions,” has been difficult to adhere to or enforce, however. Nevertheless, in some trauma population subsets, the prevalence of HIV seropositivity runs as high as 19%, and thus presents an occupational hazard to the trauma health care worker. The mainstays of universal precautions (UP) are barrier techniques against body fluid contact and protection from inadvertent needlestick. To judge compliance with a strict UP protocol, surgical residents engaged in trauma room resuscitations were observed on a random basis by trauma nurse coordinators. Previously, UP had been discussed in conferences and by memo. Over 2 months, 81 trauma rooms were observed, involving 18 house officers. N Overall, there was only 16% compliance with strict UP. The most common protocol variations involved sharps technique. While glove use was nearly universal, protective eye wear, ankle and foot protection, and body protection such as gowns or aprons were commonly ignored. Even in the presence of invasive procedures such as endotracheal intubation or insertion of chest tubes, compliance was less than 40%. The reasons most commonly given by house officers for the lapse in UP were not knowing the protocol, forgetting the protocol, or not having time to implement the protocol. Even for the nine patients residents identified as suspected of being in a high-risk category, UP was strictly adhered to only once. Compliance with universal precautions is difficult to achieve under the best of circumstances. It cannot be assumed that passive informational measures can achieve this goal. Active infection control surveillance and ongoing housestaff inservice are required to minimize the risk of inadvertent injury or contamination.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025285290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025285290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2342138

AN - SCOPUS:0025285290

VL - 30

SP - 555

EP - 561

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 5

ER -