Hospital-Based Clinicians’ Perceptions of Geographic Cohorting

Identifying Opportunities for Improvement

Areeba Kara, Cynthia S. Johnson, Siu Hui, Deanne Kashiwagi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Members of the Society of Hospital Medicine were surveyed about geographic cohorting (GCh); 369 responses were analyzed, two thirds of which were from GCh participants. Improved collaboration with the bedside nurse, increased nonclinical interactions, decreased paging interruptions, and improved efficiency were perceived by >50%. Narrowed clinical expertise, increased fragmentation, increased face-to-face interruptions, and an adverse impact on camaraderie within the hospitalist group were reported by 25% to 50%. Academic practices were associated with positive perceptions while higher patient loads were associated with negative perceptions. Comments on GCh benefits invoked improvements in (1) interprofessional collaboration, (2) efficiency, (3) patient-centeredness, (4) nursing satisfaction, and (5) GCh mediated facilitation of other interventions. GCh downsides included (1) professional and personal dissatisfaction, (2) concerns about providing suboptimal care, and (3) implementation barriers. GCh is receiving attention. Although it facilitates important benefits, it is perceived to mediate unintended consequences, which should be addressed in redesign efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Quality
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Hospitalists
Nursing
Nurses

Keywords

  • geographic cohorting
  • hospital medicine
  • interruptions
  • teamwork

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Hospital-Based Clinicians’ Perceptions of Geographic Cohorting : Identifying Opportunities for Improvement. / Kara, Areeba; Johnson, Cynthia S.; Hui, Siu; Kashiwagi, Deanne.

In: American Journal of Medical Quality, 01.12.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{19af6946f284412a8e1b6b5eb8259377,
title = "Hospital-Based Clinicians’ Perceptions of Geographic Cohorting: Identifying Opportunities for Improvement",
abstract = "Members of the Society of Hospital Medicine were surveyed about geographic cohorting (GCh); 369 responses were analyzed, two thirds of which were from GCh participants. Improved collaboration with the bedside nurse, increased nonclinical interactions, decreased paging interruptions, and improved efficiency were perceived by >50{\%}. Narrowed clinical expertise, increased fragmentation, increased face-to-face interruptions, and an adverse impact on camaraderie within the hospitalist group were reported by 25{\%} to 50{\%}. Academic practices were associated with positive perceptions while higher patient loads were associated with negative perceptions. Comments on GCh benefits invoked improvements in (1) interprofessional collaboration, (2) efficiency, (3) patient-centeredness, (4) nursing satisfaction, and (5) GCh mediated facilitation of other interventions. GCh downsides included (1) professional and personal dissatisfaction, (2) concerns about providing suboptimal care, and (3) implementation barriers. GCh is receiving attention. Although it facilitates important benefits, it is perceived to mediate unintended consequences, which should be addressed in redesign efforts.",
keywords = "geographic cohorting, hospital medicine, interruptions, teamwork",
author = "Areeba Kara and Johnson, {Cynthia S.} and Siu Hui and Deanne Kashiwagi",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1062860617745123",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Medical Quality",
issn = "1062-8606",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hospital-Based Clinicians’ Perceptions of Geographic Cohorting

T2 - Identifying Opportunities for Improvement

AU - Kara, Areeba

AU - Johnson, Cynthia S.

AU - Hui, Siu

AU - Kashiwagi, Deanne

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Members of the Society of Hospital Medicine were surveyed about geographic cohorting (GCh); 369 responses were analyzed, two thirds of which were from GCh participants. Improved collaboration with the bedside nurse, increased nonclinical interactions, decreased paging interruptions, and improved efficiency were perceived by >50%. Narrowed clinical expertise, increased fragmentation, increased face-to-face interruptions, and an adverse impact on camaraderie within the hospitalist group were reported by 25% to 50%. Academic practices were associated with positive perceptions while higher patient loads were associated with negative perceptions. Comments on GCh benefits invoked improvements in (1) interprofessional collaboration, (2) efficiency, (3) patient-centeredness, (4) nursing satisfaction, and (5) GCh mediated facilitation of other interventions. GCh downsides included (1) professional and personal dissatisfaction, (2) concerns about providing suboptimal care, and (3) implementation barriers. GCh is receiving attention. Although it facilitates important benefits, it is perceived to mediate unintended consequences, which should be addressed in redesign efforts.

AB - Members of the Society of Hospital Medicine were surveyed about geographic cohorting (GCh); 369 responses were analyzed, two thirds of which were from GCh participants. Improved collaboration with the bedside nurse, increased nonclinical interactions, decreased paging interruptions, and improved efficiency were perceived by >50%. Narrowed clinical expertise, increased fragmentation, increased face-to-face interruptions, and an adverse impact on camaraderie within the hospitalist group were reported by 25% to 50%. Academic practices were associated with positive perceptions while higher patient loads were associated with negative perceptions. Comments on GCh benefits invoked improvements in (1) interprofessional collaboration, (2) efficiency, (3) patient-centeredness, (4) nursing satisfaction, and (5) GCh mediated facilitation of other interventions. GCh downsides included (1) professional and personal dissatisfaction, (2) concerns about providing suboptimal care, and (3) implementation barriers. GCh is receiving attention. Although it facilitates important benefits, it is perceived to mediate unintended consequences, which should be addressed in redesign efforts.

KW - geographic cohorting

KW - hospital medicine

KW - interruptions

KW - teamwork

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041427396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041427396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1062860617745123

DO - 10.1177/1062860617745123

M3 - Article

JO - American Journal of Medical Quality

JF - American Journal of Medical Quality

SN - 1062-8606

ER -