Hospital quality of care

Does information technology matter? The relationship between information technology adoption and quality of care

Nir Menachemi, Askar Chukmaitov, Charles Saunders, Robert G. Brooks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospitals have been slow to adopt information technology (IT) largely because of a lack of generalizable evidence of the value associated with such adoption. PURPOSE: To explore the relationship between IT adoption and quality of care in acute-care hospitals. METHODS: Primary data on hospital IT adoption were combined with secondary hospital discharge data. Regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between various measures of IT adoption and several quality indicators after controlling for confounders. Adoption of IT was measured using a previously validated method that considers clinical, administrative, and strategic IT capabilities of acute-care hospitals. Quality measures included the Inpatient Quality Indicators developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. RESULTS: Data from 98 hospitals were available for analyses. Hospitals adopted an average of 11.3 (45.2%) clinical IT applications, 15.7 (74.8%) administrative IT applications, and 5 (50%) strategic IT applications. In multivariate regression analyses, hospitals that adopted a greater number of IT applications were significantly more likely to have desirable quality outcomes on seven Inpatient Quality Indicator measures, including risk-adjusted mortality from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and acute myocardial infarction. An increase in clinical IT applications was also inversely correlated with utilization of incidental appendectomy, and an increase in the adoption of strategic IT applications was inversely correlated with risk-adjusted mortality from craniotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Hospital adoption of IT is associated with desirable quality outcomes across hospitals in Florida. These findings will assist hospital leaders interested in understanding better the effect of costly IT adoption on quality of care in their institutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-59
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Care Management Review
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Technology
Hospital quality
Information technology adoption
Quality of care
Inpatients
Regression Analysis
Appendectomy
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
Coronary Balloon Angioplasty
Mortality
Craniotomy
Health Services Research
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Keywords

  • Hospital quality of care
  • Information technology
  • Inpatient quality indicators

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Hospital quality of care : Does information technology matter? The relationship between information technology adoption and quality of care. / Menachemi, Nir; Chukmaitov, Askar; Saunders, Charles; Brooks, Robert G.

In: Health Care Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.01.2008, p. 51-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{10b6a977615e423a8bdfce2412afc41d,
title = "Hospital quality of care: Does information technology matter? The relationship between information technology adoption and quality of care",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Hospitals have been slow to adopt information technology (IT) largely because of a lack of generalizable evidence of the value associated with such adoption. PURPOSE: To explore the relationship between IT adoption and quality of care in acute-care hospitals. METHODS: Primary data on hospital IT adoption were combined with secondary hospital discharge data. Regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between various measures of IT adoption and several quality indicators after controlling for confounders. Adoption of IT was measured using a previously validated method that considers clinical, administrative, and strategic IT capabilities of acute-care hospitals. Quality measures included the Inpatient Quality Indicators developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. RESULTS: Data from 98 hospitals were available for analyses. Hospitals adopted an average of 11.3 (45.2{\%}) clinical IT applications, 15.7 (74.8{\%}) administrative IT applications, and 5 (50{\%}) strategic IT applications. In multivariate regression analyses, hospitals that adopted a greater number of IT applications were significantly more likely to have desirable quality outcomes on seven Inpatient Quality Indicator measures, including risk-adjusted mortality from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and acute myocardial infarction. An increase in clinical IT applications was also inversely correlated with utilization of incidental appendectomy, and an increase in the adoption of strategic IT applications was inversely correlated with risk-adjusted mortality from craniotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Hospital adoption of IT is associated with desirable quality outcomes across hospitals in Florida. These findings will assist hospital leaders interested in understanding better the effect of costly IT adoption on quality of care in their institutions.",
keywords = "Hospital quality of care, Information technology, Inpatient quality indicators",
author = "Nir Menachemi and Askar Chukmaitov and Charles Saunders and Brooks, {Robert G.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.HMR.0000304497.89684.36",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "51--59",
journal = "Health Care Management Review",
issn = "0361-6274",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hospital quality of care

T2 - Does information technology matter? The relationship between information technology adoption and quality of care

AU - Menachemi, Nir

AU - Chukmaitov, Askar

AU - Saunders, Charles

AU - Brooks, Robert G.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Hospitals have been slow to adopt information technology (IT) largely because of a lack of generalizable evidence of the value associated with such adoption. PURPOSE: To explore the relationship between IT adoption and quality of care in acute-care hospitals. METHODS: Primary data on hospital IT adoption were combined with secondary hospital discharge data. Regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between various measures of IT adoption and several quality indicators after controlling for confounders. Adoption of IT was measured using a previously validated method that considers clinical, administrative, and strategic IT capabilities of acute-care hospitals. Quality measures included the Inpatient Quality Indicators developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. RESULTS: Data from 98 hospitals were available for analyses. Hospitals adopted an average of 11.3 (45.2%) clinical IT applications, 15.7 (74.8%) administrative IT applications, and 5 (50%) strategic IT applications. In multivariate regression analyses, hospitals that adopted a greater number of IT applications were significantly more likely to have desirable quality outcomes on seven Inpatient Quality Indicator measures, including risk-adjusted mortality from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and acute myocardial infarction. An increase in clinical IT applications was also inversely correlated with utilization of incidental appendectomy, and an increase in the adoption of strategic IT applications was inversely correlated with risk-adjusted mortality from craniotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Hospital adoption of IT is associated with desirable quality outcomes across hospitals in Florida. These findings will assist hospital leaders interested in understanding better the effect of costly IT adoption on quality of care in their institutions.

AB - BACKGROUND: Hospitals have been slow to adopt information technology (IT) largely because of a lack of generalizable evidence of the value associated with such adoption. PURPOSE: To explore the relationship between IT adoption and quality of care in acute-care hospitals. METHODS: Primary data on hospital IT adoption were combined with secondary hospital discharge data. Regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between various measures of IT adoption and several quality indicators after controlling for confounders. Adoption of IT was measured using a previously validated method that considers clinical, administrative, and strategic IT capabilities of acute-care hospitals. Quality measures included the Inpatient Quality Indicators developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. RESULTS: Data from 98 hospitals were available for analyses. Hospitals adopted an average of 11.3 (45.2%) clinical IT applications, 15.7 (74.8%) administrative IT applications, and 5 (50%) strategic IT applications. In multivariate regression analyses, hospitals that adopted a greater number of IT applications were significantly more likely to have desirable quality outcomes on seven Inpatient Quality Indicator measures, including risk-adjusted mortality from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and acute myocardial infarction. An increase in clinical IT applications was also inversely correlated with utilization of incidental appendectomy, and an increase in the adoption of strategic IT applications was inversely correlated with risk-adjusted mortality from craniotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Hospital adoption of IT is associated with desirable quality outcomes across hospitals in Florida. These findings will assist hospital leaders interested in understanding better the effect of costly IT adoption on quality of care in their institutions.

KW - Hospital quality of care

KW - Information technology

KW - Inpatient quality indicators

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37349056701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37349056701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.HMR.0000304497.89684.36

DO - 10.1097/01.HMR.0000304497.89684.36

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 51

EP - 59

JO - Health Care Management Review

JF - Health Care Management Review

SN - 0361-6274

IS - 1

ER -