How are health professionals using health information exchange systems? measuring usage for evaluation and system improvement

Joshua Vest, Jon Jasperson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Health information exchange (HIE) is an avenue to improving patient care and an important priority under the Meaningful Use requirements. However, we know very little about the usage of HIE systems. Understanding how healthcare professionals actually utilize HIE systems will provide practical insights to system evaluation, help guide system improvement, and help organizations assess performance. We developed a novel way of describing professionals' HIE usage from the log files of an operational HIE-facilitating organization. The system employed a webpage-style interface. The screen number, types, and variation served to cluster all sessions in to five categories of HIE usage: minimal usage, repetitive searching, clinical information, mixed information, and demographic information. This method reduced the 1,661 different patterns into five recognizable groups for analysis. Overall, most users engaged with the system in a minimal fashion. In terms of user characteristics, minimal usage was highest among physicians and the highest percentage of clinical information usage was among nurses. Usage also differed by organization with repetitive searching most common in settings with scheduled encounters and uncommon in the faster-paced emergency department. Lastly, usage also varied by timing of the patient encounter. Within a single HIE system, discernible types of users behavior existed and varied across jobs, organizations, and time. This approach relied on objective data and can be replicated. In addition, our approach demonstrates that substantial variation in user behaviors exists beyond the more simplistic measures of adoption/non-adoption or access/no-access applied in previous research. This approach can help leaders and evaluators assess their own and other organizations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3195-3204
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Medical Systems
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Information Systems
Health
Organizations
Health Information Exchange
Hospital Emergency Service
Patient Care
Nurses
Demography
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians
Research

Keywords

  • Evaluation
  • Health information technology
  • Information seeking behavior
  • Workplace

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management
  • Information Systems

Cite this

How are health professionals using health information exchange systems? measuring usage for evaluation and system improvement. / Vest, Joshua; Jasperson, Jon.

In: Journal of Medical Systems, Vol. 36, No. 5, 01.10.2012, p. 3195-3204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{78f88f8e0e57497cbce4738539a4e5a5,
title = "How are health professionals using health information exchange systems? measuring usage for evaluation and system improvement",
abstract = "Health information exchange (HIE) is an avenue to improving patient care and an important priority under the Meaningful Use requirements. However, we know very little about the usage of HIE systems. Understanding how healthcare professionals actually utilize HIE systems will provide practical insights to system evaluation, help guide system improvement, and help organizations assess performance. We developed a novel way of describing professionals' HIE usage from the log files of an operational HIE-facilitating organization. The system employed a webpage-style interface. The screen number, types, and variation served to cluster all sessions in to five categories of HIE usage: minimal usage, repetitive searching, clinical information, mixed information, and demographic information. This method reduced the 1,661 different patterns into five recognizable groups for analysis. Overall, most users engaged with the system in a minimal fashion. In terms of user characteristics, minimal usage was highest among physicians and the highest percentage of clinical information usage was among nurses. Usage also differed by organization with repetitive searching most common in settings with scheduled encounters and uncommon in the faster-paced emergency department. Lastly, usage also varied by timing of the patient encounter. Within a single HIE system, discernible types of users behavior existed and varied across jobs, organizations, and time. This approach relied on objective data and can be replicated. In addition, our approach demonstrates that substantial variation in user behaviors exists beyond the more simplistic measures of adoption/non-adoption or access/no-access applied in previous research. This approach can help leaders and evaluators assess their own and other organizations.",
keywords = "Evaluation, Health information technology, Information seeking behavior, Workplace",
author = "Joshua Vest and Jon Jasperson",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10916-011-9810-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "3195--3204",
journal = "Journal of Medical Systems",
issn = "0148-5598",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How are health professionals using health information exchange systems? measuring usage for evaluation and system improvement

AU - Vest, Joshua

AU - Jasperson, Jon

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - Health information exchange (HIE) is an avenue to improving patient care and an important priority under the Meaningful Use requirements. However, we know very little about the usage of HIE systems. Understanding how healthcare professionals actually utilize HIE systems will provide practical insights to system evaluation, help guide system improvement, and help organizations assess performance. We developed a novel way of describing professionals' HIE usage from the log files of an operational HIE-facilitating organization. The system employed a webpage-style interface. The screen number, types, and variation served to cluster all sessions in to five categories of HIE usage: minimal usage, repetitive searching, clinical information, mixed information, and demographic information. This method reduced the 1,661 different patterns into five recognizable groups for analysis. Overall, most users engaged with the system in a minimal fashion. In terms of user characteristics, minimal usage was highest among physicians and the highest percentage of clinical information usage was among nurses. Usage also differed by organization with repetitive searching most common in settings with scheduled encounters and uncommon in the faster-paced emergency department. Lastly, usage also varied by timing of the patient encounter. Within a single HIE system, discernible types of users behavior existed and varied across jobs, organizations, and time. This approach relied on objective data and can be replicated. In addition, our approach demonstrates that substantial variation in user behaviors exists beyond the more simplistic measures of adoption/non-adoption or access/no-access applied in previous research. This approach can help leaders and evaluators assess their own and other organizations.

AB - Health information exchange (HIE) is an avenue to improving patient care and an important priority under the Meaningful Use requirements. However, we know very little about the usage of HIE systems. Understanding how healthcare professionals actually utilize HIE systems will provide practical insights to system evaluation, help guide system improvement, and help organizations assess performance. We developed a novel way of describing professionals' HIE usage from the log files of an operational HIE-facilitating organization. The system employed a webpage-style interface. The screen number, types, and variation served to cluster all sessions in to five categories of HIE usage: minimal usage, repetitive searching, clinical information, mixed information, and demographic information. This method reduced the 1,661 different patterns into five recognizable groups for analysis. Overall, most users engaged with the system in a minimal fashion. In terms of user characteristics, minimal usage was highest among physicians and the highest percentage of clinical information usage was among nurses. Usage also differed by organization with repetitive searching most common in settings with scheduled encounters and uncommon in the faster-paced emergency department. Lastly, usage also varied by timing of the patient encounter. Within a single HIE system, discernible types of users behavior existed and varied across jobs, organizations, and time. This approach relied on objective data and can be replicated. In addition, our approach demonstrates that substantial variation in user behaviors exists beyond the more simplistic measures of adoption/non-adoption or access/no-access applied in previous research. This approach can help leaders and evaluators assess their own and other organizations.

KW - Evaluation

KW - Health information technology

KW - Information seeking behavior

KW - Workplace

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867314807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867314807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10916-011-9810-2

DO - 10.1007/s10916-011-9810-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 22127521

AN - SCOPUS:84867314807

VL - 36

SP - 3195

EP - 3204

JO - Journal of Medical Systems

JF - Journal of Medical Systems

SN - 0148-5598

IS - 5

ER -