How do women of diverse backgrounds value prenatal testing outcomes?

Miriam Kuppermann, Robert F. Nease, Elena Gates, Lee A. Learman, Bruce Blumberg, Virginia Gildengorin, A. Eugene Washington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To describe women's preferences for prenatal testing outcomes and to explore their association with sociodemographic characteristics and attitudes. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 584 racially/ethnically and socioeconomically diverse pregnant women aged 16 to 47 years recruited from 23 San Francisco Bay Area practices. We assessed preferences for 12 potential prenatal testing outcomes using the time trade-off metric for all outcomes and the standard gamble metric for two outcomes. Preferences were calculated on a scale of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Participants also completed a sociodemographic and attitude survey. Results: Highest preference scores were assigned to outcomes resulting in. the birth of a chromosomally normal infant (mean = 0.91-0.93; median = 0.99-1.00). Lower scores were obtained for outcomes involving pregnancy loss (mean = 0.69-0.87; median = 0.76-0.92), which were correlated with attitudes regarding miscarriage, pregnancy termination, and Down syndrome. The lowest scores were assigned to Down syndrome-affected births (mean = 0.67-0.69; median = 0.73-0.75), which also were correlated with attitudes toward Down syndrome. We did not find a statistically significant relationship between participants' preference scores and age. Conclusion: Preferences for prenatal testing outcomes vary according to the pregnant women's underlying attitudes about pregnancy loss and Down syndrome, and not according to her age. Current age/risk-based guidelines should account for individual variation in patient preferences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)424-429
Number of pages6
JournalPrenatal Diagnosis
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Down Syndrome
Pregnant Women
Parturition
Pregnancy
San Francisco
Patient Preference
Spontaneous Abortion
Pregnancy Outcome
Cross-Sectional Studies
Guidelines
Health

Keywords

  • Patient preferences
  • Prenatal diagnosis
  • Quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Kuppermann, M., Nease, R. F., Gates, E., Learman, L. A., Blumberg, B., Gildengorin, V., & Washington, A. E. (2004). How do women of diverse backgrounds value prenatal testing outcomes? Prenatal Diagnosis, 24(6), 424-429. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.892

How do women of diverse backgrounds value prenatal testing outcomes? / Kuppermann, Miriam; Nease, Robert F.; Gates, Elena; Learman, Lee A.; Blumberg, Bruce; Gildengorin, Virginia; Washington, A. Eugene.

In: Prenatal Diagnosis, Vol. 24, No. 6, 06.2004, p. 424-429.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kuppermann, M, Nease, RF, Gates, E, Learman, LA, Blumberg, B, Gildengorin, V & Washington, AE 2004, 'How do women of diverse backgrounds value prenatal testing outcomes?', Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 424-429. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.892
Kuppermann M, Nease RF, Gates E, Learman LA, Blumberg B, Gildengorin V et al. How do women of diverse backgrounds value prenatal testing outcomes? Prenatal Diagnosis. 2004 Jun;24(6):424-429. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.892
Kuppermann, Miriam ; Nease, Robert F. ; Gates, Elena ; Learman, Lee A. ; Blumberg, Bruce ; Gildengorin, Virginia ; Washington, A. Eugene. / How do women of diverse backgrounds value prenatal testing outcomes?. In: Prenatal Diagnosis. 2004 ; Vol. 24, No. 6. pp. 424-429.
@article{710a2922f7cf4f4897414009c85146fb,
title = "How do women of diverse backgrounds value prenatal testing outcomes?",
abstract = "Objectives: To describe women's preferences for prenatal testing outcomes and to explore their association with sociodemographic characteristics and attitudes. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 584 racially/ethnically and socioeconomically diverse pregnant women aged 16 to 47 years recruited from 23 San Francisco Bay Area practices. We assessed preferences for 12 potential prenatal testing outcomes using the time trade-off metric for all outcomes and the standard gamble metric for two outcomes. Preferences were calculated on a scale of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Participants also completed a sociodemographic and attitude survey. Results: Highest preference scores were assigned to outcomes resulting in. the birth of a chromosomally normal infant (mean = 0.91-0.93; median = 0.99-1.00). Lower scores were obtained for outcomes involving pregnancy loss (mean = 0.69-0.87; median = 0.76-0.92), which were correlated with attitudes regarding miscarriage, pregnancy termination, and Down syndrome. The lowest scores were assigned to Down syndrome-affected births (mean = 0.67-0.69; median = 0.73-0.75), which also were correlated with attitudes toward Down syndrome. We did not find a statistically significant relationship between participants' preference scores and age. Conclusion: Preferences for prenatal testing outcomes vary according to the pregnant women's underlying attitudes about pregnancy loss and Down syndrome, and not according to her age. Current age/risk-based guidelines should account for individual variation in patient preferences.",
keywords = "Patient preferences, Prenatal diagnosis, Quality of life",
author = "Miriam Kuppermann and Nease, {Robert F.} and Elena Gates and Learman, {Lee A.} and Bruce Blumberg and Virginia Gildengorin and Washington, {A. Eugene}",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1002/pd.892",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "424--429",
journal = "Prenatal Diagnosis",
issn = "0197-3851",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do women of diverse backgrounds value prenatal testing outcomes?

AU - Kuppermann, Miriam

AU - Nease, Robert F.

AU - Gates, Elena

AU - Learman, Lee A.

AU - Blumberg, Bruce

AU - Gildengorin, Virginia

AU - Washington, A. Eugene

PY - 2004/6

Y1 - 2004/6

N2 - Objectives: To describe women's preferences for prenatal testing outcomes and to explore their association with sociodemographic characteristics and attitudes. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 584 racially/ethnically and socioeconomically diverse pregnant women aged 16 to 47 years recruited from 23 San Francisco Bay Area practices. We assessed preferences for 12 potential prenatal testing outcomes using the time trade-off metric for all outcomes and the standard gamble metric for two outcomes. Preferences were calculated on a scale of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Participants also completed a sociodemographic and attitude survey. Results: Highest preference scores were assigned to outcomes resulting in. the birth of a chromosomally normal infant (mean = 0.91-0.93; median = 0.99-1.00). Lower scores were obtained for outcomes involving pregnancy loss (mean = 0.69-0.87; median = 0.76-0.92), which were correlated with attitudes regarding miscarriage, pregnancy termination, and Down syndrome. The lowest scores were assigned to Down syndrome-affected births (mean = 0.67-0.69; median = 0.73-0.75), which also were correlated with attitudes toward Down syndrome. We did not find a statistically significant relationship between participants' preference scores and age. Conclusion: Preferences for prenatal testing outcomes vary according to the pregnant women's underlying attitudes about pregnancy loss and Down syndrome, and not according to her age. Current age/risk-based guidelines should account for individual variation in patient preferences.

AB - Objectives: To describe women's preferences for prenatal testing outcomes and to explore their association with sociodemographic characteristics and attitudes. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 584 racially/ethnically and socioeconomically diverse pregnant women aged 16 to 47 years recruited from 23 San Francisco Bay Area practices. We assessed preferences for 12 potential prenatal testing outcomes using the time trade-off metric for all outcomes and the standard gamble metric for two outcomes. Preferences were calculated on a scale of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Participants also completed a sociodemographic and attitude survey. Results: Highest preference scores were assigned to outcomes resulting in. the birth of a chromosomally normal infant (mean = 0.91-0.93; median = 0.99-1.00). Lower scores were obtained for outcomes involving pregnancy loss (mean = 0.69-0.87; median = 0.76-0.92), which were correlated with attitudes regarding miscarriage, pregnancy termination, and Down syndrome. The lowest scores were assigned to Down syndrome-affected births (mean = 0.67-0.69; median = 0.73-0.75), which also were correlated with attitudes toward Down syndrome. We did not find a statistically significant relationship between participants' preference scores and age. Conclusion: Preferences for prenatal testing outcomes vary according to the pregnant women's underlying attitudes about pregnancy loss and Down syndrome, and not according to her age. Current age/risk-based guidelines should account for individual variation in patient preferences.

KW - Patient preferences

KW - Prenatal diagnosis

KW - Quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042696865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3042696865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pd.892

DO - 10.1002/pd.892

M3 - Article

C2 - 15229840

AN - SCOPUS:3042696865

VL - 24

SP - 424

EP - 429

JO - Prenatal Diagnosis

JF - Prenatal Diagnosis

SN - 0197-3851

IS - 6

ER -