How Important Is the Contribution of Surgical Specialties to a Medical School's NIH Funding?

Uzoezi Ozomaro, Juan C. Gutierrez, Margaret M. Byrne, Teresa Zimmers, Leonidas Koniaris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the relative contribution and importance of five surgical specialties (general surgery, urology, otolaryngology, neurosurgery, and orthopedics) to the total National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding at medical schools. Methods: Publicly available NIH funding data from 1996 to 2004 were analyzed. Results: From 1998 through 2003 the NIH budget increased from 11.2 billion to 21.9 billion dollars. Overall, NIH funding to departments of medicine was the greatest contributor to any individual medical school's total NIH funding, comprising 28.4% of total NIH awards on average, with a correlation coefficient highly predictive of medical school's ranking for NIH awards (cc = 0.93). Total NIH funding by different surgical specialties varied greatly, both within and between institutions. Together all of the surgical subspecialties combined accounted for 4.8% of medical school NIH awards on average from the years 1996 to 2004. Among the surgical specialties, general surgery received the largest fraction of NIH dollars followed by otolaryngology, neurosurgery, urology, and orthopedics. Although general surgery had the highest overall correlation coefficient of the surgical departments during the early years of the study period (r = 0.71 in 1996), its correlation significantly decreased during the period of study (as low as r = 0.54 in 2002). Conclusions: Surgical departments as an aggregate have continued to receive a stable overall fraction of NIH awards. The total funding to the different surgical departments varies considerably between institutions and does not correlate well with total institutional funding. The downward trend in the correlation of general surgery funding to total institutional funding suggests a decline in support for surgical research in this specialty nationwide.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16-21
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume141
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Surgical Specialties
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Medical Schools
Otolaryngology
Neurosurgery
Urology
Orthopedics
Budgets

Keywords

  • cost
  • extramural
  • health care
  • institutions
  • policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

How Important Is the Contribution of Surgical Specialties to a Medical School's NIH Funding? / Ozomaro, Uzoezi; Gutierrez, Juan C.; Byrne, Margaret M.; Zimmers, Teresa; Koniaris, Leonidas.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 141, No. 1, 07.2007, p. 16-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6f1e7417471747a09cbc7b7f5d48186c,
title = "How Important Is the Contribution of Surgical Specialties to a Medical School's NIH Funding?",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the relative contribution and importance of five surgical specialties (general surgery, urology, otolaryngology, neurosurgery, and orthopedics) to the total National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding at medical schools. Methods: Publicly available NIH funding data from 1996 to 2004 were analyzed. Results: From 1998 through 2003 the NIH budget increased from 11.2 billion to 21.9 billion dollars. Overall, NIH funding to departments of medicine was the greatest contributor to any individual medical school's total NIH funding, comprising 28.4{\%} of total NIH awards on average, with a correlation coefficient highly predictive of medical school's ranking for NIH awards (cc = 0.93). Total NIH funding by different surgical specialties varied greatly, both within and between institutions. Together all of the surgical subspecialties combined accounted for 4.8{\%} of medical school NIH awards on average from the years 1996 to 2004. Among the surgical specialties, general surgery received the largest fraction of NIH dollars followed by otolaryngology, neurosurgery, urology, and orthopedics. Although general surgery had the highest overall correlation coefficient of the surgical departments during the early years of the study period (r = 0.71 in 1996), its correlation significantly decreased during the period of study (as low as r = 0.54 in 2002). Conclusions: Surgical departments as an aggregate have continued to receive a stable overall fraction of NIH awards. The total funding to the different surgical departments varies considerably between institutions and does not correlate well with total institutional funding. The downward trend in the correlation of general surgery funding to total institutional funding suggests a decline in support for surgical research in this specialty nationwide.",
keywords = "cost, extramural, health care, institutions, policy",
author = "Uzoezi Ozomaro and Gutierrez, {Juan C.} and Byrne, {Margaret M.} and Teresa Zimmers and Leonidas Koniaris",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2007.02.023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "141",
pages = "16--21",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Important Is the Contribution of Surgical Specialties to a Medical School's NIH Funding?

AU - Ozomaro, Uzoezi

AU - Gutierrez, Juan C.

AU - Byrne, Margaret M.

AU - Zimmers, Teresa

AU - Koniaris, Leonidas

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - Objective: To determine the relative contribution and importance of five surgical specialties (general surgery, urology, otolaryngology, neurosurgery, and orthopedics) to the total National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding at medical schools. Methods: Publicly available NIH funding data from 1996 to 2004 were analyzed. Results: From 1998 through 2003 the NIH budget increased from 11.2 billion to 21.9 billion dollars. Overall, NIH funding to departments of medicine was the greatest contributor to any individual medical school's total NIH funding, comprising 28.4% of total NIH awards on average, with a correlation coefficient highly predictive of medical school's ranking for NIH awards (cc = 0.93). Total NIH funding by different surgical specialties varied greatly, both within and between institutions. Together all of the surgical subspecialties combined accounted for 4.8% of medical school NIH awards on average from the years 1996 to 2004. Among the surgical specialties, general surgery received the largest fraction of NIH dollars followed by otolaryngology, neurosurgery, urology, and orthopedics. Although general surgery had the highest overall correlation coefficient of the surgical departments during the early years of the study period (r = 0.71 in 1996), its correlation significantly decreased during the period of study (as low as r = 0.54 in 2002). Conclusions: Surgical departments as an aggregate have continued to receive a stable overall fraction of NIH awards. The total funding to the different surgical departments varies considerably between institutions and does not correlate well with total institutional funding. The downward trend in the correlation of general surgery funding to total institutional funding suggests a decline in support for surgical research in this specialty nationwide.

AB - Objective: To determine the relative contribution and importance of five surgical specialties (general surgery, urology, otolaryngology, neurosurgery, and orthopedics) to the total National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding at medical schools. Methods: Publicly available NIH funding data from 1996 to 2004 were analyzed. Results: From 1998 through 2003 the NIH budget increased from 11.2 billion to 21.9 billion dollars. Overall, NIH funding to departments of medicine was the greatest contributor to any individual medical school's total NIH funding, comprising 28.4% of total NIH awards on average, with a correlation coefficient highly predictive of medical school's ranking for NIH awards (cc = 0.93). Total NIH funding by different surgical specialties varied greatly, both within and between institutions. Together all of the surgical subspecialties combined accounted for 4.8% of medical school NIH awards on average from the years 1996 to 2004. Among the surgical specialties, general surgery received the largest fraction of NIH dollars followed by otolaryngology, neurosurgery, urology, and orthopedics. Although general surgery had the highest overall correlation coefficient of the surgical departments during the early years of the study period (r = 0.71 in 1996), its correlation significantly decreased during the period of study (as low as r = 0.54 in 2002). Conclusions: Surgical departments as an aggregate have continued to receive a stable overall fraction of NIH awards. The total funding to the different surgical departments varies considerably between institutions and does not correlate well with total institutional funding. The downward trend in the correlation of general surgery funding to total institutional funding suggests a decline in support for surgical research in this specialty nationwide.

KW - cost

KW - extramural

KW - health care

KW - institutions

KW - policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250181360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250181360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2007.02.023

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2007.02.023

M3 - Article

C2 - 17574035

AN - SCOPUS:34250181360

VL - 141

SP - 16

EP - 21

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

IS - 1

ER -