How valid are family proxy assessments of stroke patients' health-related quality of life?

Linda Williams, Tamilyn Bakas, Edward Brizendine, Laurie Plue, Wanzhu Tu, Hugh Hendrie, Kurt Kroenke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE - Proxy respondents are often needed to report outcomes in stroke survivors, but they typically systematically rate impairments worse than patients themselves. The magnitude of this difference, the degree of agreement between patients and proxies, and the factors influencing agreement are not well known. METHODS - We compared patient and family proxy health-related quality of life (HRQL) responses in 225 patient-proxy pairs enrolled in a clinical trial for poststroke depression. We used paired t-tests and the intraclass correlation (ICC) statistic to evaluate the agreement between patient and proxy domain scores and the overall Stroke-specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) score. We used multivariate linear regression to model patient- and proxy-reported SS-QOL scores. RESULTS - Patients were older (63 versus 55 years) and less often female (48% versus 74%) than proxies. Proxies rated all domains of SS-SQOL slightly worse than patients. The Mood, Energy, and Thinking domains had the greatest disparity with mean patient-proxy differences of 0.45, 0.37, and 0.37 points, respectively. The ICC for each domain ranged from 0.30 (role function) to 0.59 (physical function). Proxy overall SS-QOL score was also lower (worse) than patient score (3.7 versus 3.4, P<0.001) with ICC of 0.41. Agreement was higher among patient-proxy pairs with higher patient depression scores and with lower proxy report of caregiving burden. CONCLUSIONS - Proxies systematically report more dysfunction in multiple aspects of HRQL than stroke patients themselves. Agreement between patient and proxy HRQL domain scores is modest at best and is affected by patient depression and proxy perception of burden. These differences may be large enough to impact the outcome assessment in stroke clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2081-2085
Number of pages5
JournalStroke
Volume37
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2006

Fingerprint

Proxy
Stroke
Quality of Life
Depression
Clinical Trials
Family Health
Survivors
Linear Models

Keywords

  • Caregiver
  • Outcomes
  • Quality of life
  • Scales
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

How valid are family proxy assessments of stroke patients' health-related quality of life? / Williams, Linda; Bakas, Tamilyn; Brizendine, Edward; Plue, Laurie; Tu, Wanzhu; Hendrie, Hugh; Kroenke, Kurt.

In: Stroke, Vol. 37, No. 8, 08.2006, p. 2081-2085.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7ec4a4d21ba84a468d710a505aad7275,
title = "How valid are family proxy assessments of stroke patients' health-related quality of life?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE - Proxy respondents are often needed to report outcomes in stroke survivors, but they typically systematically rate impairments worse than patients themselves. The magnitude of this difference, the degree of agreement between patients and proxies, and the factors influencing agreement are not well known. METHODS - We compared patient and family proxy health-related quality of life (HRQL) responses in 225 patient-proxy pairs enrolled in a clinical trial for poststroke depression. We used paired t-tests and the intraclass correlation (ICC) statistic to evaluate the agreement between patient and proxy domain scores and the overall Stroke-specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) score. We used multivariate linear regression to model patient- and proxy-reported SS-QOL scores. RESULTS - Patients were older (63 versus 55 years) and less often female (48{\%} versus 74{\%}) than proxies. Proxies rated all domains of SS-SQOL slightly worse than patients. The Mood, Energy, and Thinking domains had the greatest disparity with mean patient-proxy differences of 0.45, 0.37, and 0.37 points, respectively. The ICC for each domain ranged from 0.30 (role function) to 0.59 (physical function). Proxy overall SS-QOL score was also lower (worse) than patient score (3.7 versus 3.4, P<0.001) with ICC of 0.41. Agreement was higher among patient-proxy pairs with higher patient depression scores and with lower proxy report of caregiving burden. CONCLUSIONS - Proxies systematically report more dysfunction in multiple aspects of HRQL than stroke patients themselves. Agreement between patient and proxy HRQL domain scores is modest at best and is affected by patient depression and proxy perception of burden. These differences may be large enough to impact the outcome assessment in stroke clinical trials.",
keywords = "Caregiver, Outcomes, Quality of life, Scales, Stroke",
author = "Linda Williams and Tamilyn Bakas and Edward Brizendine and Laurie Plue and Wanzhu Tu and Hugh Hendrie and Kurt Kroenke",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1161/01.STR.0000230583.10311.9f",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "2081--2085",
journal = "Stroke",
issn = "0039-2499",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How valid are family proxy assessments of stroke patients' health-related quality of life?

AU - Williams, Linda

AU - Bakas, Tamilyn

AU - Brizendine, Edward

AU - Plue, Laurie

AU - Tu, Wanzhu

AU - Hendrie, Hugh

AU - Kroenke, Kurt

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE - Proxy respondents are often needed to report outcomes in stroke survivors, but they typically systematically rate impairments worse than patients themselves. The magnitude of this difference, the degree of agreement between patients and proxies, and the factors influencing agreement are not well known. METHODS - We compared patient and family proxy health-related quality of life (HRQL) responses in 225 patient-proxy pairs enrolled in a clinical trial for poststroke depression. We used paired t-tests and the intraclass correlation (ICC) statistic to evaluate the agreement between patient and proxy domain scores and the overall Stroke-specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) score. We used multivariate linear regression to model patient- and proxy-reported SS-QOL scores. RESULTS - Patients were older (63 versus 55 years) and less often female (48% versus 74%) than proxies. Proxies rated all domains of SS-SQOL slightly worse than patients. The Mood, Energy, and Thinking domains had the greatest disparity with mean patient-proxy differences of 0.45, 0.37, and 0.37 points, respectively. The ICC for each domain ranged from 0.30 (role function) to 0.59 (physical function). Proxy overall SS-QOL score was also lower (worse) than patient score (3.7 versus 3.4, P<0.001) with ICC of 0.41. Agreement was higher among patient-proxy pairs with higher patient depression scores and with lower proxy report of caregiving burden. CONCLUSIONS - Proxies systematically report more dysfunction in multiple aspects of HRQL than stroke patients themselves. Agreement between patient and proxy HRQL domain scores is modest at best and is affected by patient depression and proxy perception of burden. These differences may be large enough to impact the outcome assessment in stroke clinical trials.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE - Proxy respondents are often needed to report outcomes in stroke survivors, but they typically systematically rate impairments worse than patients themselves. The magnitude of this difference, the degree of agreement between patients and proxies, and the factors influencing agreement are not well known. METHODS - We compared patient and family proxy health-related quality of life (HRQL) responses in 225 patient-proxy pairs enrolled in a clinical trial for poststroke depression. We used paired t-tests and the intraclass correlation (ICC) statistic to evaluate the agreement between patient and proxy domain scores and the overall Stroke-specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) score. We used multivariate linear regression to model patient- and proxy-reported SS-QOL scores. RESULTS - Patients were older (63 versus 55 years) and less often female (48% versus 74%) than proxies. Proxies rated all domains of SS-SQOL slightly worse than patients. The Mood, Energy, and Thinking domains had the greatest disparity with mean patient-proxy differences of 0.45, 0.37, and 0.37 points, respectively. The ICC for each domain ranged from 0.30 (role function) to 0.59 (physical function). Proxy overall SS-QOL score was also lower (worse) than patient score (3.7 versus 3.4, P<0.001) with ICC of 0.41. Agreement was higher among patient-proxy pairs with higher patient depression scores and with lower proxy report of caregiving burden. CONCLUSIONS - Proxies systematically report more dysfunction in multiple aspects of HRQL than stroke patients themselves. Agreement between patient and proxy HRQL domain scores is modest at best and is affected by patient depression and proxy perception of burden. These differences may be large enough to impact the outcome assessment in stroke clinical trials.

KW - Caregiver

KW - Outcomes

KW - Quality of life

KW - Scales

KW - Stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747151628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747151628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/01.STR.0000230583.10311.9f

DO - 10.1161/01.STR.0000230583.10311.9f

M3 - Article

C2 - 16809575

AN - SCOPUS:33747151628

VL - 37

SP - 2081

EP - 2085

JO - Stroke

JF - Stroke

SN - 0039-2499

IS - 8

ER -